Originally posted by Luigi-San

---

They all have your face on them.

---

Originally posted by Alice

---

Originally posted by jeff

---

YOUR BARGAINING POSTURE IS HIGHLY DUBIOUS.

my posts should be easy to read. i don't think many of them pass over three sentences. i usually type short, simple, and to the point. i don't read long posts so i won't write long posts either.

10.75. and it said this was all 1 sentence. smart.

---

Probably because you don't capitalize the first letter.

---

Originally posted by SamuraiX

---

2. Sometimes, things just need to slow down. (2 points)
2. So, thee sonnet's judgement smite windows?
OR
Windows's sentient judgement smoothes.
These take a long time. Is it something one gets better at, these anagram things?

---

Originally posted by Arwon

---

In a country full of elite and elitist private universities it seems strange to attack a top public university for elitism and catering to rich kids...

---

Originally posted by Arwon

---

See I think the debate about micronations is far more interesting than the copyright issues.

Why isn't Sealand or the Hutt River Province a country?

---

Originally posted by Kamek

---

Originally posted by Xkeeper

---

I've managed to get 30-something by typing in "testtesttesttesttesttesttest" over and over... again, this tool is rather dubious.

---

I highly doubt that the tool is entirely legitimate given that copy-pasting the two "words" "abcdefghijklmnop qrstuvwxyz" 100 times yields a 57.77 grade level. I certainly don't need multiple doctoral degrees to know that that's absolute nonsense.

---

Originally posted by emcee

---

Although those against abortion, stem cell research and gay marriage are probably more likely to be Christian, that doesn't mean these are really "Christian views". A lot of people promote them as that, because is helps their cause, but it's not really the case.

Take the issue of abortion, for instance. 33% of Americans want a ban on abortions not involving rape or health risks to the mother. So even if every last one of those people were Christians, the majority of the 80% of American Christians are clearly not against abortion.

---

Originally posted by Ziff

---

I'm pretty sure that that contravenes a whole bunch of laws and stuff.

---

Originally posted by Alice

---

I would have thought the ears, hair, and fur might have been a hint that this counts as furry. Nevermind the words "fur"/"furry" appearing all over the place.

Personally when I see things like that I tend to just ignore the tail/ears/etc and all is well.

Also:

Now this thread actually has a point.

---

Originally posted by emcee

---

Originally posted by SamuraiX

---

On the contrary, I'm pretty sure Pope John Paul II was strongly against abortion, if that's any indicator. Even so, how can one say American Christians represent all Christians, and thus theorise what a Christian would do under given circumstances? Does saying one is a Christian make them a Christian?
If there was a value clash between net neutrality and the immorality of abortion, most Christians on this board might just care more about net neutrality.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4288103.stm

---

I'm not talking about the former Pope, or non-Americans. I'm specifically referring to the 80% of Americans that Koryo mentioned.

And the 80% number only means 80% of Americans filled in a circle or checked a box next to the word "Christian". It doesn't says what denomination, how religious they actually are, if they are fundamentalist "bible belt" Christians, or whether they even attend a church. It really gives no insight at all in to their political views, which is the point I was trying to make in that last post.

---

Originally posted by Kamek

---

Originally posted by Xkeeper

---

I've managed to get 30-something by typing in "testtesttesttesttesttesttest" over and over... again, this tool is rather dubious.

---

I highly doubt that the tool is entirely legitimate given that copy-pasting the two "words" "abcdefghijklmnop qrstuvwxyz" 100 times yields a 57.77 grade level. I certainly don't need multiple doctoral degrees to know that that's absolute nonsense.

---

Originally posted by Colin

---

I like how people were complaining at work last week about global warming and then complaining yesterday about the snow.

You can't have it both ways, guys.

---

Originally posted by Xkeeper

---

Originally posted by emcee

---

It's not the percent of the workers that matters, its the percent of the total money earned.

---

Five people making $10000 (aproximately $5.50/hr, 40hr/week, 52wk/yr), versus one making $50000 a year.

Those five people will get a much more major change, versus the $50k who won't feel much of anything.

Yet, with this way of thinking, those five people are still just 50% of the consideration, and a single person is now 50% as well.

I would like to point out that this is a flawed way of thinking, in that it would benefit a few (the wealthy) and go against many (the not-so-wealthy).

This is exactly the type of thinking we don't need.

---

Originally posted by Grey

---

There isn't much in the way of a community college here in RI... Depending on where you go, you're either going to 13th grade, or you're going to what would be more accurately termed as a college prep school.

While our main Community College is an excellent place for applied learning degrees such as graphics and business, it has some weaknesses in the areas of sciences and some forms of higher-level education. It's a school to go to to get a job, as opposed to a school to go to to get a degree. From my understanding, many Community Colleges are like that, and not all CC students transfer to higher education facilities.

Me, I just started off direct with University. I don't regret it, my grades in high school gave me a full scholarship as long as I can keep my GPA up. You might want to start thinking about something for a post-University form of education, if you want to pursue a degree higher than a Bachelor's, like a Master's or a Doctorate.

---