(Link to AcmlmWiki) Offline: thank ||bass
Register | Login
Views: 13,040,846
Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album
05-03-24 06:30 AM
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - - Posts by cds113089
User Post
cds113089
Newcomer


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: Chicago

Last post: 6718 days
Last view: 6718 days
Posted on 11-18-05 06:26 PM, in Hack Database Link
peter_ac, I think the links to the hacks you posted on there are down. Just lettin' you know.
cds113089
Newcomer


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: Chicago

Last post: 6718 days
Last view: 6718 days
Posted on 11-18-05 06:31 PM, in Bowser's Return [SS] Link
The graphics and backgrounds are simply amazing!
cds113089
Newcomer


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: Chicago

Last post: 6718 days
Last view: 6718 days
Posted on 12-02-05 07:37 PM, in Do you believe that science goes against religion? Link
Originally posted by Rydain
Hoo boy. It looks like I have to do Phantomrain's homework for him. *cracks knuckles* Funny how all of these issues are addressed in great detail at the talkorigins.org archive, which I have already posted a link to and told people to read so they understand what they are arguing against instead of trotting out a bunch of strawmen, and I still get a bunch of strawmen anyway.


There's few creationists who haven't seen the TalkOrigins archive. But rather than answer Phantomrain's and Bookworm's points you've just complained that they are not defining "evolution" correctly. Whatever you want to define evolution as, Bookworm made several good points against uniformitarianism, a theory that evolution is impossible without. Uniformitarianism itself is not evolution, but it is crucial to the theory of evolution and a subject that is very relevant to any debate. Bookworm isn't making any strawmen here.

Macro evolution is the hypothesis that was made popular most notably by Charles Darwin. It states that creatures can mutate for no known reason and become other creatures. For instance, that fish can mutate into amphibians or that apes can mutate into homosaipiens.


No. Scientists define macroevolution as evolution above the species level, and the definition says nothing about reasons for this change, known or otherwise.


Yes...pretty much what the previous poster said, only he's defining the long-term results.


o rly? Heck, speciation has been observed many times in the wild and in laboratory settings.


Rydain is building one of his own strawmen to burn. Speciation is an important part of the creation model as well. "Species" as defined by modern scientists are not the same as "kinds" defined in Genesis 1, when God said that each animal would produce after its own kind. There can be many different species in a "kind".


Survey sez...BZZZZZT! Populations of bacteria develop antibiotic resistance that ultimately arises as the result of mutations. This is a very well-documented problem that pharmaceutical companies struggle with. How exactly are those mutations "always harmful, never helpful" to the bacteria?


You're right, mutations don't always result in the loss of genetic information, but mutations cannot add genetic information either. In the case of the bacteria, mutations modified genetic information in a way that ended up being helpful to the bacteria.


This smells like more circumstantial ad hominem to me. What does the political spectrum have to do with the fossil record? And why do you insist on a reference from a history text and not a biology text, considering that evolution belongs to the realm of biology? Besides, a whole slew of transitional fossils have been found.


See here.


As for the Miller-Urey experiment, it is completely irrelevant to the issue of evolution. As I have stated, and as the talkorigins.org archive explains, evolution is the change in genetic makeup of populations over time. That's it. It has nothing whatsoever to do with how life came to exist on earth in the first place.


No one ever said this debate was limited to the definition of evolution as defined by TalkOrigins.


Also, to those who confuse Roman Catholicism with Christianity, bear with me.


This being finished, I have some serious problems with what Rydain has to say about the Catholic Church.


Roman Catholosism, though originally Christian has fallen away from the Truth of the gospel and has become a politically correct group of people who want to be religious. They believe things which are contrary to the Bible and though many Roman Catholics are Christians, many more are not because they have never been taught the Truth of Jesus' redeeming Grace.

For example, Roman Catholics believe that they must confess their sins to a priest and that they must do penance in order to be absolved of their sins. This is incorrect. "For by Grace you have been saved, through Faith. It is the gift of God, not of works, lest any man should boast." Ephesians 2:8 "For Christ died for sins once for all, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive by the Spirit."

These verses, if you believe in the Bible, make it clear that there is no need for confession to a priest or for penance, as Christ already paid for all your sins.


Actually, Catholics believe in confession more because it is quite liberating to confess sins to one another. The Bible also says we should confess our sins to one another. It is only mortal sins (such as murder, serious theft, blasphemy) that can threaten one's salvation.


Think of it this way; let's say that someone gave you a gift. Let’s say that they paid for that gift already. However, you decide that you're going to pay for the gift again. Only one problem, the gift cost this person 100 million dollars and you not only don't have 100 million dollars, you have no money, no home no car no nothing. All you have are the clothes on your back and some food stamps. Now, let me ask you, if that person already paid for that gift, paid for it in cash and paid for all of it down to the last cent, do you need to pay for it? No, you don't. Not only do you not have to pay for it, even if you wanted to, you couldn't. That's like how Salvation works. We have been given a "gift" by the almighty God. It’s called Salvation. This gift is, as the definition of a gift makes clear, free to us. God has already paid for it by sending his Son, Jesus, to die on the cross for our sins (all those bad things we do). Here’s the catch, we can't pay for that gift. 1) Because it's already been paid for in full and 2) because even if we tried we would fall far short of God's perfect standard. Yes, that's right I said perfect. What’s perfect mean? It means sinless, without blemish or spot, perfectly clean, sanctified, blameless. Now I ask you, is that you? Have you eve told a white lie or gone 1 mile over the speed limit? Have you ever had bad feelings toward someone else or hurt someone other than in self-defense? Well guess what? that means you're not perfect, which means *drum roll please* that you cannot pay for your sins no matter how many hail mary's and our father's you say, not matter how much community service you put in.


Actually, think of it more like this way: Someone gave you a gift, and you damaged it. Since you can't afford to replace it, you must take it to get repaired. If you damage a gift too much, it's not going to work.

No one in the Catholic Church is suggesting that it is possible to gain your way into heaven by works. This is a big strawman. As for James 2:26, it is not saying that works can get you salvation, but it is saying that without doing good deeds, how much faith do you really have? Not much.


Another thing which has been made up by the Roman Catholic Church is the idea of purgatory. This is the place where those not fortunate to go directly to heaven stay until they have paid for their sins. I ask you this; where in the Bible does it say ANYTHING about purgatory? Purgatory was invented many many many many many years ago (several hundred actually) in order to frighten the tenants of the Roman Catholic faith into working their butts off for no good reason to try to get to heaven. Again I mention that you cannot pay for your sins, and that yes indeed you have sinned "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God" Romans 3:23


No, the Bible does not say anything about purgatory, although 2 Maccabees (part of the Apocrypha which is considered scriptural by Catholics) is used as a supporting verse for this doctrine when people pray for the dead. Purgatory, as far as I know, has always been taught by the Catholic Church as far back as history can tell us.

Catholics believe in the Bible completely, all 66 (73 for them) books. They just also believe in Tradition. Catholics believe that you cannot earn your way into heaven and that the only way to get to heaven is by the salvation Christ offered.
cds113089
Newcomer


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: Chicago

Last post: 6718 days
Last view: 6718 days
Posted on 12-04-05 06:36 PM, in Do you believe that science goes against religion? Link
Originally posted by Silvershield
Originally posted by drjayphd
cds113089: Catholics believe that you cannot earn your way into heaven and that the only way to get to heaven is by the salvation Christ offered.

...which is precisely what rankles me about fundamentalist Christianity, the belief that acceptance is all you need. But that's another topic for another thread.
To look to a cliche for an example, would anyone here suppose that a person from some distant, uncivilized part of the world is destined to burn for eternity just because he hasn't accepted Christ, even though he has no contact with Christianity (or any Western religion, for that matter)? To live a good life and treat one's neighbors with unconditional love is all that God asks of us, though to believe in Him makes that path infinitely easier.



Romans 1:20 (NIV)..."For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse."

btw: Catholics are in no way fundamentalists.


(edited by cds113089 on 12-04-05 05:38 PM)
cds113089
Newcomer


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: Chicago

Last post: 6718 days
Last view: 6718 days
Posted on 12-04-05 06:40 PM, in Good Levels Link
I usually just make hacks for my own personal enjoyment, but it still takes me a couple days per level, and even then I'll still have to go back every so often and make some changes.
cds113089
Newcomer


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: Chicago

Last post: 6718 days
Last view: 6718 days
Posted on 12-04-05 06:46 PM, in N00by questions about Lunar Magic... Link
Rather than take time to change all the graphics and get them perfectly right, my suggestion is to:

1) Find a level with the graphic set you want already in place, and edit it.
2) Go to the overworld.
3) Go to 16x16 tile editing mode and click on the level tile you want your level to be at.
4) Go to overworld in the toolbar, and click on modify level tile settings. Pick the level number of the level you modified.

To place overworld tiles, you need to left-click on a tile that is the same as the one you want to place, and then right-click.
cds113089
Newcomer


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: Chicago

Last post: 6718 days
Last view: 6718 days
Posted on 12-10-05 06:33 PM, in SMB3 workshop wont work Link
That happens to me, too. For those of you who need more description: When you click on the icon to open SMB3 Workshop, the menu that BlueCar posted shows up. The program doesn't work. Personally, I don't find it all that incovenient to just download it every time I want to use it, because for me it always works the first time I open it.
cds113089
Newcomer


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: Chicago

Last post: 6718 days
Last view: 6718 days
Posted on 12-10-05 06:42 PM, in Super Mario Heros And Rivals Link
Most emulators take screenshots.

If your first level won't load, chances are you have too many objects in it. If it's a plain level, take out those colored platforms. Somewhere on the internet there's a page which explains how to fix levels in SMB3 that aren't loading.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - - Posts by cds113089


ABII

Acmlmboard 1.92.999, 9/17/2006
©2000-2006 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper

Page rendered in 0.028 seconds; used 383.23 kB (max 471.70 kB)