(Link to AcmlmWiki) Offline: thank ||bass
Register | Login
Views: 13,040,846
Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album
04-23-23 07:47 PM
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - - Posts by Zem
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55
User Post
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-13-06 11:09 PM, in Pet Chat! Link
this seems to be shaping up as more of a list thread than a chat thread
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-13-06 11:18 PM, in Paper Mario graphics problem Link
this is the case with apparently every single N64 emulator with paper mario specifically, or at least it was a few years ago when I was last trying N64 emulation. most compatibility lists will be like, "paper mario: works, with flickering"
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-14-06 05:58 AM, in There's a secret board flag, but I seem to have lost it. Link
that was a little too easy there buddy

speaking of too easy, maybe you should make it not show up in online.php, eh? not that that's where I got it from.
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-14-06 06:24 AM, in Happy Birthday, Mel! Link
Originally posted by Trapster
Hmm, I thought we werenīt allowed to post or link to such things. Mel will be happy for it, though.

Happy Birthday, Melvo. I dunno why Iīve started to call you that.

What things? There's not even any nudity. And as for the rest of your post, what is wrong with you? Do you make no sense just to irritate me? Because it is working extremely fucking well.


(edited by Zem on 03-14-06 05:25 AM)
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-14-06 06:31 AM, in Yoz Link
Originally posted by Adamant
Who's next, Shroomy?

been and (apparently) gone
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-14-06 03:50 PM, in Not-so-Lost Thread #7, which is still alive even after two hack attacks Link
Originally posted by Trapster
You know that itīs only the network thatīs 52mb/s, right?

Almost no broadband connection is that fast except those that companies are using.

this surprised me

a trapster post with substance and no irrelevant padding

I encourage you to keep this up
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-15-06 04:24 PM, in base ten LOL Link
So yeah, my post quality has clearly been dropping lately, so I'm going to take a break from the main board. I'll still post here. I plan to make a new layout before I return; it's been too long since I made something.
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-19-06 11:25 PM, in My quarrels with your moral fibre Link
I only noticed this thread becuase Cy posted in it.

Instead of building on the discussion as it's proceeded, I'm going to pretend the first post is still a virgin and take it from there.

First off:


Ever since I first came to the Internet, there was this narrow minded view of how people on the Internet should operate. If you don't follow a set of guidelines given to you through the almighty "FAQ", you're toast. Here, there is no mercy. Yet even those in power break the rules.

The phrase "narrow minded" is interesting there. You seem to be implying that setting up rules for a community is an outdated notion? Are there some hot fresh "thinking outside the box" solutions for managing a community? Unfortunately, you don't explain this further; I guess you just wanted to get in a snide dig on the concept of "rules."
You're right, even those in power break the rules. Whatever the definition of 'flaming,' it's been broken by some staff members here. This is a fact. Let's see if it matters.


You might see an issue with this one. But I see this all the time on forums, especially in politically related threads. What separates Bush Bashing from regular old flaming? Is it because he's your leader? Is it because he is not a member of this forum? Does that really justify flaming him? I think it shows a failure to understand exactly what it is you're doing, and in some countries it only provokes the death penalty (God bless Freedom of Speech, eh?)

Another big assumption on my part here: it looks like some people were bashing Bush, you got upset, tried to invoke the "no flaming" rule, and got shut down? This controversy has come up before; it seems generally that what little protection the "no flaming" rule offers only extends to people on the forum. I say "little protection" because that rule is very vague and plenty of flaming goes on unpunished all the time, from staff members and regular members alike. It is true that oldbies get more preferential treatment than newbies. This is partially justifiable and partially not. I'll explain that later; let's continue.


This rule should be enforced a little more. If you truly want people to not act stupid, maybe it should be regulated a little more for those of us who aren't new to the forum or don't have a history of being stupid. If that can't be done, perhaps this should be elated on, rather than telling us what to do and what not to do, or what your definition of spam is. At least new users have an excuse to be stupid, but when people act stupid just to mock them, it shows their mentality. And for mods to be acting this way tells me alot about the capability of their leadership skills.

This paragraph, though it doesn't contain any crippling mechanical errors, is horribly written. Lemme see if I can parse this.
Okay, you think "No being stupid" should be enforced more. That's easy enogh.
Uh... second sentence is confusing. I'm guessing you mean "for the sake of." So, for the benefit of experienced users and folks with clean records, this rule should be enforced more. I think that's what you're saying.
Elated on. .....Okay, "elaborated on" makes sense there. I'll guess that's what you meant. Perhaps this should be elaborated on, rather than telling us what to do and what not to do? I would think telling us what to do and what not to do is a great way to clarify the rules. What are you saying here?
All right, the last two sentences are easy enough to figure out.

Now that I think I know what you're saying, I can try to respond.
You think "no being stupid" should be enforced more, I got that (you said it twice). But then you said the rule should be clarified. Okay, so the rule should be clarified, and then enforced more? And if it should be enforced "for those of us who aren't new to the forum or don't have a history of being stupid," does that mean you think harsher action should be taken against newbies and people who do have a history of being stupid? If so, well, that makes sense, but it's largely the case already. And then, I guess, you say that people who mock stupid people are themselves stupid, and mods have done this, therefore those mods are stupid. I'm not sure I see quite what you're saying here; maybe you could explain it further. Rephrase it. Don't try to write above your level.


Is it really necessary to point this out? A hack is still a hack, and even the smallest achievement should be properly criticized. When you just filter this kind of thing out like trash, it only makes way for more people who have no patience for failure. Is that the kind of community we really desire? Just a bunch of short tempered, short minded reverse engineers?

Well, this rule is unclear. Your writing is unclear. I don't feel like working my way through this and I don't really care about the state of the ROM hacking forums, so I'll skip this one.


I think that above all, there is a lack in understanding of how things are supposed to be run, and the way things are run in real life. Oh, one could argue for hours about how the Internet is not a real place, therefore the laws of reality do not exist, but since we're incorporating our rules of society into online communities, why not go the full distance?

This is fairly straightforward. Thanks for getting your thoughts straight before writing this paragraph.


Wait, I forgot that the internet is ruled by adolescents. There are no adults here, and even if there were, what would they say about our behaviour?

All right, basically you're saying the board's administrators are immature.

This isn't a response to your writing, this is a response to the content of your post, but I can't refrain from pointing out along the way how difficult it is to discern what you're actually trying to say.


Subconsciously, the online community is a getaway from the harsh reality we have to deal with in life. We don't even realize it until it's shoved in our face, like now. So what does this say about the user who comes here on a daily basis? Do they not enjoy the way things are going on the other end? I am not ashamed to say that life is not very enjoyable on my end sometimes, but I'm learning from my mistakes.

I don't know what the fuck point you're trying to get across here. Alls I got out of this paragraph was:
-online community = getaway from life
-sometimes my life is unenjoyable
-I learn from my mistakes

It's obvious you're trying to say other things in this paragraph, but I'm sorry, I can't figure out what they are. I'm not exaggerating here; I couldn't figure out any of the opinions and/or facts that you were trying to present.


The point of that is that I have lots of time to learn from my mistakes, but here we only have 3 strikes until you're gone and out for the count. It's a general principle that people adopt as a successful breeding method, but fails in the end.

What would happen if real life was like that?

Okay, finally we get to what appears to be your main point.
First off, there's no three-strike rule here, really, no matter what anyone says. So, that's irrelevant.
Second, breeding? What? Fails? Where?
Third... okay, this is important.
This is an online community. It is analogous to a real-life community. It is not analogous to a person's life or country. In a real-life community, there are rules for being a member, whether explicitly stated or not. If you disobey the rules enough, you are no longer allowed to be a member of that community. Do you agree that it's a reasonable system, for a community? If not, I guess further discussion is warranted. But that means you have beef with the whole concept of a community, not an Internet message board specifically.

It sounds to me like what you really have beef with is the fact that the rules are vague and enforced inconsistently. If that's true, then just fucking say it, please. If not, say whatever you actually mean. Either way, you didn't say much in this post. I'll assume I'm right, so here's my rebuttal.

The rules are vague. The rules, as written, are amazingly, horribly, incomprehensibly vague. This is true. However, if you spend a small amount of time here, it's very easy to see where the line is and how to avoid crossing it. This is a small community, so the rules can easily be enforced on a case-by-case basis. And they are.

Let's talk about flaming: if you don't want to get in trouble, don't flame. That's easy. So in the case of flaming, if you follow the rules in the FAQ ("no flaming") you won't run into any problems. However, you notice that some people can flame and get away with it. After a while it becomes apparent that the rules, as given, outline a sort of "safe zone" where you can act without worry, but it also becomes apparent that it's possible to thrive outside this safe zone. The area outside the safe zone is not adequately described: you venture there at your own risk. This is where unbanned flamers dwell. They get a gut feeling for what might get them banned, and they disobey the letter of the law without getting banned. Of course, there are no guarentees out there, and you can't blame anyone but yourself for getting banned, because you were disobeying the rules. I'm not describing anything you're unfamiliar with. I'm just pointing out that disobeying the rules is not an automatic ban (despite what anyone may say), but that you do so at your own risk.

Okay, I'm getting bored, so I'm just gonna stop there. Bite me. Maybe I'll come back and finish what I was saying later.

edit: a couple clarifications


(edited by Zem on 03-19-06 10:34 PM)
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-22-06 02:03 PM, in Survival of the Fittest and the Application Thereof. Link
I haven't followed the whole thread, so maybe someone said this already, but we haven't "gotten past" or "overcome" the notion of survival of the fittest.

People who are most likely to reproduce (and are able to have their offspring survive to do the same) will pass on their genes.

There it is, in its simplest form.

The way society functions now, this is probably not "the strongest" or even "the smartest," although the strongest and the smartest would of course gain some advantages. But some people will be better than others at successfully cultivating their genes, and that will cause (is causing) the gene pool to trend towards those attributes.

I've read a couple of things stating "Scientists think people may evolve to have only four toes!" This is stupid. I think the slight energy gain from having two fewer toes would be far outweighed by a somewhat smaller chance to reproduce. That's the kind of misinformation that makes people think humans have "surpassed" evolution (not that anyone suggested that here).
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-22-06 02:53 PM, in Ads. Link
If they ever contain images like the ads at the bottom sometimes do (or did?) I'm blocking them.

Text ads, I can ignore.
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-22-06 10:35 PM, in WELCOME YOUR NEW MOD Link
Hi new mod
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-22-06 10:40 PM, in The board sure is awfully quiet around this time, no? Link
Unknown Entity's Ambush crits you for 1724.
Unknown Entity crits you for 831.
Unknown Entity's Sinister Strike crits you for 1320.
You die.
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-22-06 10:41 PM, in WE HAVE AN ERROR Link
T ZACHIO I WAS THAT BLENDER

**DRAMA**
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-23-06 05:14 AM, in Smoking Marijuana Link
I like Primus.

A lot.

But citing song lyrics as proof of your arguments is fucking retarded.
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-23-06 02:47 PM, in Smash Brothers Discussion thread (Screenshots, Trailers, Come on people, ANYTHING new!) Link
Originally posted by Skyon
I own this game! I can;t find a worthy opponent anywhere! It kills me because I want to fight someone that makes me sweat from my ears and bleed through my nose. I went to my local EB games, and this big fat geek worked there; I was buying some sort of game I don't remember, but I ended up saying something about SSBM to my brother, and this dude interrupts me and my brother; so I'm thinkin' "Cool, someone likes this game" right... and so I get to telling him that I like to use Fox, and he starts asking me about the Toward + B special attacks that they use on there; he asked if I knew the "trick" to going really fast back and forth, and I said "no, I don't I like to block, roll behind my opponent and smash attack a lot; sometimes I use the strong kick but not the one as strong as the samsh, anyway I was excited, I was thinking "He looks like he doesn't have a life, he's a geek; surly he's good at games; he likes smash brothers, cool this can be really fun!" So I ask him: "Hey, dude, If you want to fight me on that game when you got downtime I'll play ya', what do ya' think, bro?" He's like "Alright, but you're gonna lose"! and then he laughed the most geeky laugh I had ever heard, but no worries I was going to rip this guy apart of SSBM. So I was supposed to come back at 9PM, and I did. When I got there I approached him and was ready with all my gear(My memory card, especially) Instead of keeping this very important appointment; he disreguards that I took the time to come over there, and he goes down two doors down to the freakin' comic book store! I'm like "WHAT!!??" Come on!! So sad to say I am still without a worthy opponent; if any of you are good at this game, and you live in the Indianpolis area give me a call if you want to play my cell is. ###########; my name is James.

This is a truly excellent post.


(edited by Grey on 03-24-06 04:38 PM)
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-23-06 02:51 PM, in Acmlm's World of Warcraft Thread Link
Originally posted by C'aos
23 now, attempted Deadmines for the first time and barely managed to kill VC, I'm surprised the entire event ran as flawlessly as it did.

Very soon after I realized I was missing 3-4 quests from there, so I got to sit around Westfall waiting for more groups to head out so I could make a repeat trip. I quickly found out my first run would have been the lucky one. Usually I get online really late so there's not many parties running around there, and the ones I get are pretty absurd. One of note was two hunters, two rogues and me, none of which were over 19 if I remember.

I had to run back to repair my equipment and smelt the copper I was digging a few minutes prior, and they'd already headed in and got a massive link, while I sat in town watching them helplessly trying to bandage each other. I lol'd.

I still have faith though, this is hella fun.

You're lucky to have killed VC, like 90% of the pickup groups for that instance contain one or more failures who never learn how not to wipe the party. For some reason this is less the case for RFC on the horde side.

Though VC may be easier now that it's probably a majority of alts at that level
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-23-06 02:53 PM, in Why are you Chargeing me for This? Link
don't forget new content ("LOL BLIZZ SUX" remarks aside)
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-25-06 10:32 PM, in Zelda DS: Phantom Hourglass Link
Originally posted by NEONswift
Final issue I can see with the limited footage and images avaliable and i do stress it is only limited so far but the dungeons to me look like the worst design Nintendo has ever come up with. It all seems to be one big square maze made up of blocks and relatively unimpressive textures which don't reflect on anything Zelda has done before. Worst of all it reeks of bad PS1 levels or the piss awful Megaman 64 randomly generated dungeons. I'm hoping it gets spruced up a little.

Hmm, I thought they just looked more like the dungeons from Link's Awakening and LTTP.
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-27-06 08:12 AM, in This forum is lacking something. Link
I was thinking maybe cowbell
Zem
Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering.


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6230 days
Last view: 6230 days
Posted on 03-29-06 06:46 PM, in Acmlm's World of Warcraft Thread Link
why even try to pretend you'll be able to play on patch day

has it ever worked
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - - Posts by Zem


ABII

Acmlmboard 1.92.999, 9/17/2006
©2000-2006 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper

Page rendered in 0.237 seconds; used 461.77 kB (max 597.91 kB)