 |
| Register | Login | |||||
 |
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
|
| Register | Login | |||||
|
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - - Posts by Deleted User |
| User | Post | ||
|
Deleted User Banned                Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| HA! | |||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| I think I proved | |||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| Iv\'e been looking for SMW the legend continues.If you know his website or where I can get the game at let me know.thanks | |||
|
Deleted User Banned  Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| I\\\'m looking for the patch .ips NOT THE ROM not the rom its self so chill oldman (edited by like MIKE on 11-08-06 08:21 PM) |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned  Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| You know what, just go ahead and ban me, becuase I see it comming anyway | |||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| Omg guess what guys, I'm retarded lololol. | |||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| your girl friend dumped u. U think shes a hoe for being with all your friends. Your god dam family hates u. U want to die , but don't have the guts to do it. try this! stop winning and get a fucking life. don't wine to me wine to your fucking ex.
Your fucking Guridian  |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| You think you're the best, huh? Banning me here because you got banned at my forums is just lame, and so are you. Just saying goodbye to this nazi-regime forum. Nice job, XDouche.
It's just sad how you take revenge for things happening on other forums but meh, you'll loose in the end anyway, because I don't care about this forum anymore. The people who promoted you to admin and coder seriously made a mistake. 
Bye all, I won't be coming back to this place as there is no need for me to get banned without a reason. Xkeeper = Hijo de puta, conchumadre. Pollo. Adios. (edited by loli on 11-22-06 04:34 AM) |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
Ice man, your gonna get your board killed just like what happened to us...  Dang, I wasted a perfectly good username! |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| (spam bullshit) (edited by Xkeeper on 11-23-06 11:56 AM) |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
I think it's really similar to HTML, so [Ai, Ceeee, Em,El] keeping the last letter silent  (edited by Secret on 11-26-06 11:29 PM) |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| Or not. (edited by Xkeeper on 11-27-06 10:11 AM) |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| Banned Username: Justin Demafilis
Can anyone please open this file up? It looks strange. You can see some cool text in that file too. The attachment is below: |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| Can you please approve me for SMW Hacking? I have lots of experience with Lunar Magic, and surely I will help those new people who want to make Mario hacks. I'm nice to all new people, I don't spam, and I don't get off topic. I'd be a great guy for SMW Hacking. | |||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| u stupid assholes i found the holes so fix it cabrones fuck u ppl fuck u world | |||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| if I ever meet a wild and trying to act as amture as she can 12/13 yr old somwhere say on a bench sitting by her self lonely. talk to her and get to know her a bt than ask her if she has a bf, than ask her if she smokes any pot, and if she says yes, ask her if she ever dirnks alcohol, if she knows where to get some (or if I know ask her ifs hed like to get some with me) and also get some alochol and go somwhere where we can be alone like in an abandoned shack or a forest, than ask her if I should also get some condoms in case we decide to get wild. Im actually thinking of going back to the teen dance night and if some girl or girls show itnerest or talk to me Ill offer her some pot in my car and can take it from there.
I actually met a 13 yr old online but she lives far form me who said she likes to smoke pot and go to adult parties that her friends bro lets her in caus ehe knows her, and has a friend who met a 26 yr old guy there who she gave a bj and threw up at her place later. Im 22 btw. here is a pic of that girl who said she likes smoking pot (met her form a Polish site and she had to write shes a tleast 15 like myspace but shes really 13): http://natalia7075.sympatia.onet.pl/ |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| http://www.perverted-justice.com/?archive=can_i_rape_you_anally
"can_i_rape_you_anally (09/05/06 8:39:16 PM): would you want me to come there and rape you? kieragirlrulz (09/05/06 8:39:52 PM): you mean like what u said before can_i_rape_you_anally (09/05/06 8:40:04 PM): ya, rape = rough sex only lol can_i_rape_you_anally (09/05/06 8:40:15 PM): i just like the word rape lol kieragirlrulz (09/05/06 8:40:36 PM): oh ok can_i_rape_you_anally (09/05/06 8:41:10 PM): so come over there? kieragirlrulz (09/05/06 8:41:30 PM): yea on like fri or sat kieragirlrulz (09/05/06 8:41:32 PM): do you work can_i_rape_you_anally (09/05/06 8:41:36 PM): not right now kieragirlrulz (09/05/06 8:41:42 PM): oh ok thats cool can_i_rape_you_anally (09/05/06 8:41:42 PM): on a vacation lol can_i_rape_you_anally (09/05/06 8:41:59 PM): oh, when i do come over to rape you.. what do you think if i brought a videocam?" "can_i_rape_you_anally (09/05/06 8:49:38 PM): ae you on myspace? can_i_rape_you_anally (09/05/06 8:49:41 PM): right now kieragirlrulz (09/05/06 8:49:42 PM): yea kieragirlrulz (09/05/06 8:49:47 PM): no not right now lol kieragirlrulz (09/05/06 8:49:50 PM): i got a page can_i_rape_you_anally (09/05/06 8:49:58 PM): go on myspace for a sec kieragirlrulz (09/05/06 8:50:08 PM): why for can_i_rape_you_anally (09/05/06 8:50:15 PM): just do it 
kieragirlrulz (09/05/06 8:50:18 PM): ok ok can_i_rape_you_anally (09/05/06 8:50:25 PM): good girl lol kieragirlrulz (09/05/06 8:51:02 PM): ok im on what u want kieragirlrulz (09/05/06 8:51:26 PM): oh is that u. mike? ( He send me a myspace request that sent me to his profile which featured "I love rape" banners and images.)" |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| this is my post here,and i got a lot of helpful information i need,thanks a lot.
One of the things I find fascinating about a massively multiplayer online roleplaying WOW game is the concept of the in-game "economy."As the fact that MMORPGs have resources that anyone at all can go out and harvest, there's little reason to let someone else ruin your experience of the economy. Instead of letting a lack of money get you down, farm your own resources, make some money through selling things so you can keep up with the economy, and undercut some of those high prices by just enough to make a difference. Looking forwarking to share much more in the future!! (edited by Alexa on 12-08-06 08:18 PM) |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| Table 4.
Temperatures in an unheated farm-scale reactor during the course of a year Temperature (¡ÆC) Soil (at 1 m depth)a Manure tankb Assumed operational temperature January 4 7–9 February 4 n.m. March 5 n.m. April 3 n.m. May 9 n.m. June 11 n.m. 11 July 15 17–20 17 August 17 17–20 18 September 14 15–17 15 October 13 12–14 13 November 8 n.m. December 4 n.m. a Monthly average as calculated from Nimmermark [23]. b Measured data from an unheated digester tank for cow manure (Önnestad, Sweden). 3. Results 3.1. Operation of the pilot scale reactors Fig. 2 shows the methane yield obtained for the reactors at different temperatures during months 5–14 at OLRs of 0.5–0.6 kg VS m−3 day−1. Results of between 11 ¡ÆC and 18 ¡ÆC were obtained with reactor 1 and of between 20 ¡ÆC and 37 ¡ÆC with reactor 2. Results from 11 ¡ÆC, 12 ¡ÆC and 32–35 ¡ÆC were obtained with the substrate from the year-2 harvest, whereas the other results was obtained with the substrate from the year-1 harvest. The yield increased with the temperature and the highest yield obtained was 0.40 m3 CH4 kg VS−1 at 30 ¡ÆC. At 11 ¡ÆC, the yield was only one-third of that obtained at 30 ¡ÆC. At temperatures above 30 ¡ÆC the yield decreased. During months 5–14, the operation of both reactors was stable, although some accumulation of VFAs occurred. In reactor 2, the pH increased with increasing temperature from pH 7.3 at 24 ¡ÆC to 7.6 at 37 ¡ÆC. At temperatures below 30 ¡ÆC, the acetic acid concentration was generally below 0.05 g l−1, but it occasionally increased up to a level of 0.20 g l−1. The concentration of propionic acid varied between 0.03 and 0.22 g l−1. At 30 ¡ÆC and higher, acetic acid and propionic acid were rarely detected, and then usually at concentrations of less than 0.10 g l−1. In reactor 1, the pH remained between 7.2 and 7.5 at temperatures of 17–11 ¡ÆC. At temperatures of 16 ¡ÆC and above, the concentrations of acetic acid and of propionic acid were below 0.10 g l−1 and 0.13 g l−1, respectively. At temperatures of 15 ¡ÆC and below, the acetic acid and the propionic acid concentrations were in the range of 0.04–0.35 g l−1 and 0.10–0.38 g l−1, respectively. (11K) Fig. 2. Methane yield obtained at different temperatures at an OLR of 0.5–0.6 kg VS m−3 day−1 and an HRT of 90 days. Results for 11–18 ¡ÆC were obtained with reactor 1 and results for 20–37 ¡ÆC with reactor 2. Results for 11 ¡ÆC, 12 ¡ÆC and 32–27 ¡ÆC were obtained with the substrate from harvest year 2. The other results were obtained with the substrate from harvest year 1. The error bars show the standard deviations; n = 2 for 18 ¡ÆC, 22 ¡ÆC, 24 ¡ÆC, 26 ¡ÆC, 27 ¡ÆC, 32 ¡ÆC, 35 ¡ÆC and 37 ¡ÆC; n = 3 for 12 ¡ÆC and 28 ¡ÆC; n = 4 for 13 ¡ÆC, 25 ¡ÆC, and 30 ¡ÆC; n = 5 for 14 ¡ÆC; n = 6 for 20 ¡ÆC; n = 7 for 11 ¡ÆC and n = 8 for 17 ¡ÆC. Table 5 shows the results of increasing the OLR at operational temperatures of 15 ¡ÆC and 30 ¡ÆC, respectively, obtained during months 16–24. The reasons for higher values being obtained in reactor 1 for acetic acid and ¥á at an OLR of 1.6 kg VS m−3 day−1 than for an OLR of 2.1 kg VS m−3 day−1 was that the reactor was run first at the higher loading rate. The optimal gas production rates were obtained at the highest loading rates tested which were 4.1 kg VS m−3 day−1 for reactor 2 (30 ¡ÆC) and 2.1 kg VS m−3 day−1 for reactor 1 (15 ¡ÆC). However, there were signs of instability at these loading rates since acetic acid and propionic acid accumulated, resulting in a decrease in pH and an increase in ¥á (Table 5). The optimal loading rates were therefore found to be 1.6 kg VS m−3 day−1 for reactor 1 and 3.3 kg VS m−3 day−1 for reactor 2. For reactor 1, the methane yield decreased with increasing OLR. For reactor 2, the methane yield decreased slightly for OLRs higher than 0.5 kg VS m−3 day−1, and also when the reactor was overloaded at 4.1 kg VS m−3 day−1, but at loading rates of 1–3.3 kg VS m−3 day−1 the yield was fairly constant. Table 5. Monitored parameters of the biological process OLR (kg VS m−3 day−1) pH ¥á Acetic acid (g l−1) Propionic acid (g l−1) Methane yield (m3 CH4 kg VS−1) Methane production rate (m3 CH4 m−3 day−1) Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Reactor 1 0.5 7.4 7.5 0.27 0.32 0.07 0.28 0.09 0.20 0.23 0.11 1.0 7.4 7.5 0.31 0.39 0.37 0.72 0.25 0.77 0.17 0.17 1.6 7.1 7.2 0.59 1.01 2.30 3.11 1.01 2.28 0.14 0.22 2.1 7.2 7.5b 0.46 0.91a 1.10 2.74 1.97 3.03 0.11 0.24 Reactor 2 0.5 7.4 7.4 0.24 0.32 0 0.08 0 0.04 0.39 0.18 1.0 7.4 7.5 0.22 0.37 0 0.08 0 0.01 0.32 0.33 2.1 7.4 7.6 0.23 0.32 0.02 0.78 0.01 0.25 0.32 0.66 3.3 7.5 7.6 0.27 0.32 0.04 0.60 0.02 0.11 0.29 0.98 4.1 7.0 7.2b 0.32 1.04a 1.44 3.16a 0.31 0.71a 0.24 0.97 a Increasing concentration during the period. b Decreasing concentration during the period. 3.2. Energy balances The energy input and the energy output for the pilot scale reactors are shown in Fig. 3. The energy input is divided into the energy needed for feeding, heating and stirring, respectively. The energy needed for heating the substrate and the digester tank was estimated from the monitored values and compared to the calculated values. The monitored values, however, were found to be unreasonably high, since the energy needed for heating the substrate was 1.44 times as high as the calculated value and the energy needed for heating the tank was 5.5 times as high as the calculated value. Because, as taken up in the discussion, the heat losses from the pilot-scale reactors appeared unnecessarily high, and the calculated values were considered to be more realistic, the latter values were used. The energy for feeding includes preparation of the substrate slurry, pumping of the substrate and the effluent, and recirculation of the reactor slurry before and after feeding. Since for OLRs at 1–4 kg VS m−3 day−1 feeding occurred once a day, the energy input for preparing and feeding the substrate only decreased slightly for an increase in OLR. The energy needed for heating and for stirring per tonne of VS increased with a decrease in OLR since HRT increased with a decrease in OLR. Because of the high energy consumption that stirring and heating required, the energy balance at an operational temperature of 30 ¡ÆC is negative for OLRs of 1 and 0.5 kg VS m−3 day−1, whereas at an operational temperature of 15 ¡ÆC it is negative at all OLRs. (39K) Fig. 3. The measured energy production and the calculated energy consumption for the pilot-scale reactors at different OLRs at 15 ¡ÆC (A) and 30 ¡ÆC (B) shown as the energy production () and the energy input for pretreatment and feeding of the substrate (¡á), for heating () and for stirring (). Fig. 4 shows the energy balance calculated for a theoretical farm-scale system in which the reactors are similar to those used in the pilot-scale experiment but are scaled up and have improved insulation. For this scenario all the energy balances are positive with energy inputs ranging from 19–26% of the energy produced. |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| Table 4.
Temperatures in an unheated farm-scale reactor during the course of a year Temperature (¡ÆC) Soil (at 1 m depth)a Manure tankb Assumed operational temperature January 4 7–9 February 4 n.m. March 5 n.m. April 3 n.m. May 9 n.m. June 11 n.m. 11 July 15 17–20 17 August 17 17–20 18 September 14 15–17 15 October 13 12–14 13 November 8 n.m. December 4 n.m. a Monthly average as calculated from Nimmermark [23]. b Measured data from an unheated digester tank for cow manure (Önnestad, Sweden). 3. Results 3.1. Operation of the pilot scale reactors Fig. 2 shows the methane yield obtained for the reactors at different temperatures during months 5–14 at OLRs of 0.5–0.6 kg VS m−3 day−1. Results of between 11 ¡ÆC and 18 ¡ÆC were obtained with reactor 1 and of between 20 ¡ÆC and 37 ¡ÆC with reactor 2. Results from 11 ¡ÆC, 12 ¡ÆC and 32–35 ¡ÆC were obtained with the substrate from the year-2 harvest, whereas the other results was obtained with the substrate from the year-1 harvest. The yield increased with the temperature and the highest yield obtained was 0.40 m3 CH4 kg VS−1 at 30 ¡ÆC. At 11 ¡ÆC, the yield was only one-third of that obtained at 30 ¡ÆC. At temperatures above 30 ¡ÆC the yield decreased. During months 5–14, the operation of both reactors was stable, although some accumulation of VFAs occurred. In reactor 2, the pH increased with increasing temperature from pH 7.3 at 24 ¡ÆC to 7.6 at 37 ¡ÆC. At temperatures below 30 ¡ÆC, the acetic acid concentration was generally below 0.05 g l−1, but it occasionally increased up to a level of 0.20 g l−1. The concentration of propionic acid varied between 0.03 and 0.22 g l−1. At 30 ¡ÆC and higher, acetic acid and propionic acid were rarely detected, and then usually at concentrations of less than 0.10 g l−1. In reactor 1, the pH remained between 7.2 and 7.5 at temperatures of 17–11 ¡ÆC. At temperatures of 16 ¡ÆC and above, the concentrations of acetic acid and of propionic acid were below 0.10 g l−1 and 0.13 g l−1, respectively. At temperatures of 15 ¡ÆC and below, the acetic acid and the propionic acid concentrations were in the range of 0.04–0.35 g l−1 and 0.10–0.38 g l−1, respectively. (11K) Fig. 2. Methane yield obtained at different temperatures at an OLR of 0.5–0.6 kg VS m−3 day−1 and an HRT of 90 days. Results for 11–18 ¡ÆC were obtained with reactor 1 and results for 20–37 ¡ÆC with reactor 2. Results for 11 ¡ÆC, 12 ¡ÆC and 32–27 ¡ÆC were obtained with the substrate from harvest year 2. The other results were obtained with the substrate from harvest year 1. The error bars show the standard deviations; n = 2 for 18 ¡ÆC, 22 ¡ÆC, 24 ¡ÆC, 26 ¡ÆC, 27 ¡ÆC, 32 ¡ÆC, 35 ¡ÆC and 37 ¡ÆC; n = 3 for 12 ¡ÆC and 28 ¡ÆC; n = 4 for 13 ¡ÆC, 25 ¡ÆC, and 30 ¡ÆC; n = 5 for 14 ¡ÆC; n = 6 for 20 ¡ÆC; n = 7 for 11 ¡ÆC and n = 8 for 17 ¡ÆC. Table 5 shows the results of increasing the OLR at operational temperatures of 15 ¡ÆC and 30 ¡ÆC, respectively, obtained during months 16–24. The reasons for higher values being obtained in reactor 1 for acetic acid and ¥á at an OLR of 1.6 kg VS m−3 day−1 than for an OLR of 2.1 kg VS m−3 day−1 was that the reactor was run first at the higher loading rate. The optimal gas production rates were obtained at the highest loading rates tested which were 4.1 kg VS m−3 day−1 for reactor 2 (30 ¡ÆC) and 2.1 kg VS m−3 day−1 for reactor 1 (15 ¡ÆC). However, there were signs of instability at these loading rates since acetic acid and propionic acid accumulated, resulting in a decrease in pH and an increase in ¥á (Table 5). The optimal loading rates were therefore found to be 1.6 kg VS m−3 day−1 for reactor 1 and 3.3 kg VS m−3 day−1 for reactor 2. For reactor 1, the methane yield decreased with increasing OLR. For reactor 2, the methane yield decreased slightly for OLRs higher than 0.5 kg VS m−3 day−1, and also when the reactor was overloaded at 4.1 kg VS m−3 day−1, but at loading rates of 1–3.3 kg VS m−3 day−1 the yield was fairly constant. Table 5. Monitored parameters of the biological process OLR (kg VS m−3 day−1) pH ¥á Acetic acid (g l−1) Propionic acid (g l−1) Methane yield (m3 CH4 kg VS−1) Methane production rate (m3 CH4 m−3 day−1) Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Reactor 1 0.5 7.4 7.5 0.27 0.32 0.07 0.28 0.09 0.20 0.23 0.11 1.0 7.4 7.5 0.31 0.39 0.37 0.72 0.25 0.77 0.17 0.17 1.6 7.1 7.2 0.59 1.01 2.30 3.11 1.01 2.28 0.14 0.22 2.1 7.2 7.5b 0.46 0.91a 1.10 2.74 1.97 3.03 0.11 0.24 Reactor 2 0.5 7.4 7.4 0.24 0.32 0 0.08 0 0.04 0.39 0.18 1.0 7.4 7.5 0.22 0.37 0 0.08 0 0.01 0.32 0.33 2.1 7.4 7.6 0.23 0.32 0.02 0.78 0.01 0.25 0.32 0.66 3.3 7.5 7.6 0.27 0.32 0.04 0.60 0.02 0.11 0.29 0.98 4.1 7.0 7.2b 0.32 1.04a 1.44 3.16a 0.31 0.71a 0.24 0.97 a Increasing concentration during the period. b Decreasing concentration during the period. 3.2. Energy balances The energy input and the energy output for the pilot scale reactors are shown in Fig. 3. The energy input is divided into the energy needed for feeding, heating and stirring, respectively. The energy needed for heating the substrate and the digester tank was estimated from the monitored values and compared to the calculated values. The monitored values, however, were found to be unreasonably high, since the energy needed for heating the substrate was 1.44 times as high as the calculated value and the energy needed for heating the tank was 5.5 times as high as the calculated value. Because, as taken up in the discussion, the heat losses from the pilot-scale reactors appeared unnecessarily high, and the calculated values were considered to be more realistic, the latter values were used. The energy for feeding includes preparation of the substrate slurry, pumping of the substrate and the effluent, and recirculation of the reactor slurry before and after feeding. Since for OLRs at 1–4 kg VS m−3 day−1 feeding occurred once a day, the energy input for preparing and feeding the substrate only decreased slightly for an increase in OLR. The energy needed for heating and for stirring per tonne of VS increased with a decrease in OLR since HRT increased with a decrease in OLR. Because of the high energy consumption that stirring and heating required, the energy balance at an operational temperature of 30 ¡ÆC is negative for OLRs of 1 and 0.5 kg VS m−3 day−1, whereas at an operational temperature of 15 ¡ÆC it is negative at all OLRs. (39K) Fig. 3. The measured energy production and the calculated energy consumption for the pilot-scale reactors at different OLRs at 15 ¡ÆC (A) and 30 ¡ÆC (B) shown as the energy production () and the energy input for pretreatment and feeding of the substrate (¡á), for heating () and for stirring (). Fig. 4 shows the energy balance calculated for a theoretical farm-scale system in which the reactors are similar to those used in the pilot-scale experiment but are scaled up and have improved insulation. For this scenario all the energy balances are positive with energy inputs ranging from 19–26% of the energy produced. |
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - - Posts by Deleted User |
