 |
| Register | Login | |||||
 |
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
|
| Register | Login | |||||
|
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - - Posts by Deleted User |
| User | Post | ||
|
Deleted User Banned                 Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
That's not appropriate, YK. |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
Originally posted by geeogree Because if you invalidate the Old Testament you invalidate the Bible as a whole. Evolution is the process in which the non-orderly becomes orderly for no reason, which can not be seen, and will never be seen because if nobody was there, who's there to say it happened? ~ Essay ~ According to evolution, I could go to my backyard with explosives and blowup the pile of wood, if I blow it up time and time again at some point I'll get a five story mansion. You know all that 'proof' they have for evolution like, the 'missing link', when 'man made life', 'length of time it takes for fossilization to take place', and the time taken to create layers of rock are all radical parts of the 'missing picture'. The 'missing link' they claim to have found is none other then a human scull and a monkey jaw bone. Every replica you will find of this peace of 'evidence' will have no indication of it being a fake. Each copy is made without the file marks on it, because they were 'touched up' for the replicas. The only think that can be gathered by this information is that there is no 'missing link' or it is yet to be found. There was a claim in which 'man made life' this actual event was a failure. The 'master mind' behind this 'discovery' didn't really make life; he made something much less then life. He made was one left hand atomic acids and one right hand atomic acid, some form of tar and something else like tar. Tar sticks to broken up organic mutual like atomic acids, which is one of the required elements to sustain life. The number of atomic acids required for life is something like 21 left hand, without these you can't have life. According to evolution, it takes years and years for something to fossilize, this is highly inaccurate. It takes a length of less then 3 years to fossilize something, the exact number escapes me. This can be experimented; you'd need something dead because of cruelty to animal laws, then just stick it in the ground and dig it up in a few years. Many believe that the number of years for water to set down layers of water is at least thousands, but they couldn't be more incorrect. If you take a look at Mt. St Helens, you'll find that the layers laid down by the 'massive' amount of water set down all the layers in a matter of a few days. If it was really thousands of years, that was the shortest thousand years I've ever experienced. For of the parts printed in text books today are the 'missing link', 'man made life in a lab', 'the long wait for fossilization', and 'waters time of cutting away at stone'. Does the 'missing link' really exists, or is he just a fanciful myth thought up by the doubtful. After the failure in the lab, is it really possible to create life in the lab. If it ever takes thousand of years for the fossilizing process, I hope never to have to watch it. Watching something like the carving of stone by water would be quite interesting. Your time has come to chouse your path, is there are many roads which should be taken. I can not answer, for it is your path to follow not mine. |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned  Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Tester When I built my computer(lastweek), I went on and installed IRC, lololol, and when I got to AIM Triton, I said fuck this shit and reformatted within 15 minutes. |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned  Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
Super Mario Odyssey and my hack: super mario dangeorus mission  |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| my hack's:
Super Mario dangerous mission Author: legoman Status: 2 world's Release Date: 2005 or 2006 I not sure Description: (in finland ) : bowser muuttaa marion näkymäättömäksi! ja prinsesssa on kadonnut!
Custom Features: Levels and OW and gfx Difficulty: indossibul! Locked: Not yet. FAQ: ----- Rating: People seem to like it. Super Mario 5 Author: legoman Status: 2 world's Release Date: 2005 or 2006 I not sure Description: (in finland ) : bowser on (taas kerran...) kidnapannut pinsessan! (lol)
Custom Features: Levels and OW and gfx Difficulty: indossibul! Locked: Not yet. FAQ: ----- Rating: People seem to like it. pacman advanture Author: legoman Status: 1 or 2 world's I not sure 
Release Date: 2005 or 2006 I not sure Description: (in finland ) : en ole vieläkään keksnyt! Custom Features: Levels and OW and some gfx Difficulty: indossibul! Locked: Not yet. FAQ: ----- Rating: People seem to like it. (edited by legoman on 12-02-05 06:22 AM) |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| lego rock raiders! |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned  Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
I have logo island 2: the brickster's revenge for my computer  and lego islans 2 is good game! |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Tester Yeah, I killed a guy about four times in a row, and he called me a skank. :/ |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned  Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| Oh, I was thinking this was a thread where we posted ways we'd be insulted, but oh well. Nope, I don't think I've been called anything but Nick and Thayer. Oh and jew. :/ | |||
|
Deleted User Banned  Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Danielle I love you too Danielle. <3 |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Ziff Shockingly, I agree with Ziff! When I said, I don't see what the big deal is, well, my biggest thing is this, if creationist and ID proponents are going to advocate their ideas, I don't see why they can't do so within the frame of a peer-reviewed journal. The majority of works seemed to have been published in books (which don't have to pass through peer-review, and getting a book published is probably a lot easier than getting a paper published, minus the obvious financial cost). I've talked with some creationists who claimed their work was rejected, yet I asked for copies of the rejection letter, and they wouldn't provide it. Additionally, sometimes papers do have to be rejected a lot and revised, one of my friends has been working for at least two to three years submitting the same paper, but everytime it goes to review, either some new information comes out and he rescinds his submission so he can write it over, or one of the reviewers has another suggestion, etc. My overall point is, if creationism and ID want to be taken seriously as science, then they need to be proposed in a way that actually conforms to science. There was a really good symposium on TV (it was on CSPAN, I think), I don't usually watch those, but I was flipping through the channels, it had scientists and apologists from both sides talking, really fantastic, I'd love to have a transcript. v_v |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| What is the best??? Do they really work?? Please Comments. | |||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| dowload my hacks: (super mario 5, pacman advanture and super mario: dangerous mission)
download: [link delete] :o if you find bug, TELL ME! (edited by legoman on 12-13-05 08:52 AM) |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| And what about Microsoft's Antispyware?? | |||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Blue Falkon screenshots: http://board.acmlm.org/thread.php?id=226 Originally posted by neo wath hack you play? |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Ailure I'm level 10 now though. Xkeeper needs to hurry up. |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
| You look vaguely like myself, though sadly I don't have a digital camera or a recent enough photograph to prove it. | |||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Ziff I don't think the issue is of publication, it's of novelty. Posting it on a messageboard does not constitute a previously published work, AFAIK, but it could possibly constitute that the work in question was no longer a novel contribution, it would depend on how strict the journal in question is. I'm afraid that Acmlm's board doesn't represent the size of distribution that would really be needed for a non-published work's novelty to be violated.  But do make sure that you at least make a post or something when your work has been accepted, and when it is officially published, and perhaps even consider distributing copies online thereafter (PDFs if your journal allows them to be distributed). |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Ran-chan I meant, they usually mate in water, not on land. D: |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 5910 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Ailure Didn't you think it was before? D: |
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - - Posts by Deleted User |
*