Register | Login | |||||
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
| |
0 users currently in World Affairs/Debate. |
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - World Affairs/Debate - Ballot Tampering | New poll | | |
Pages: 1 2 | Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
User | Post | ||
Rom Manic Since: 12-18-05 From: Detroit, WHAT?! Last post: 6425 days Last view: 6425 days |
| ||
http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/3/2006/1355
For a moment, I thought the Free Press was a fake. But they seem to be genuine, and I'm hoping this is true. I'd like to see an impeachment. |
|||
geeogree Red Cheep-cheep Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6440 days Last view: 6425 days |
| ||
Bush isn't getting impeached.... get used to it
and people really need to get over the fact that he won the election. less than 2 years and you can have another chance to have a democrat try and run the country.... until then give it up with the "Impeach Bush cause...." |
|||
Vyper Kodondo Raging Venom Since: 11-18-05 From: Final Fantasy Fire Last post: 6442 days Last view: 6442 days |
| ||
Originally posted by geeogreePlease, spare me. If Hillary becomes president we're all going to die. |
|||
geeogree Red Cheep-cheep Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6440 days Last view: 6425 days |
| ||
yeah, that would be a bad thing
I'd rather see Bill than Hillary really... at least he got some head |
|||
Skydude Armos Knight Since: 02-18-06 From: Stanford, CA Last post: 6699 days Last view: 6699 days |
| ||
People compared Bill to JFK, and my response to that is that Kennedy at least had good taste. I mean, seriously, infidelity is wrong, but if you're going to do it, Marilyn Monroe seems a good choice, not some frumpy intern...
There are a number of factual inconsistencies and, as usual, misleading statements in that, such as suggesting that all 14,000 reported ballots in that district were invalid...they said it was a strongly Republican area...he probably would've gotten a similar boost anyway, EVEN IF these dubious reports are to be believed. I get a bit suspicious of things that take this long to come out, with, again, dubious and biased sources. |
|||
Young Guru Snifit Since: 11-18-05 From: Notre Dame, IN Last post: 6432 days Last view: 6425 days |
| ||
I don't understand the obsession with impeaching bush. It's only happened twice before, and even though I consider myself to be a whole lot more liberal than most, I don't think he should be impeached. If he were to be impeached because of this someone would have to find a link that bush told them to stuff the ballot. Just because some people stuffed ballots to help the man they wanted to win an election win (and I highly doubt that happened, but even if it did) doesn't mean bush will get punished for it. (edited by beneficii on 04-26-06 08:27 PM) |
|||
beneficii Broom Hatter Since: 11-18-05 Last post: 6428 days Last view: 6425 days |
| ||
OK, Bill was horrible, Bush is horrible. They're all horrible. They all need to get impeached. The only bad thing about Bill's impeachment was that he didn't get thrown out and the worst thing about Bush is that he hasn't been impeached and thrown out yet. They all need to get shaken up and everything. | |||
Ziff B2BB BACKTOBASICSBITCHES Since: 11-18-05 From: A room Last post: 6425 days Last view: 6425 days |
| ||
An impeachment should be held on better grounds than a blow job or having a failing war. If more comes out about Bush's actions (the Plame affair and stuff like that are disturbing) before his term is over then impeachment should be considered. However, he is just being a bad president. | |||
Silvershield 580 Since: 11-19-05 From: Emerson, New Jersey Last post: 6437 days Last view: 6425 days |
| ||
...yeah, it doesn't really suit my taste that Clinton was censured when his only crime, effectively, was cheating on his wife. That's a terrible thing to do, sure, but it doesn't justify any sort of action taken on his political or occupational life. | |||
Ziff B2BB BACKTOBASICSBITCHES Since: 11-18-05 From: A room Last post: 6425 days Last view: 6425 days |
| ||
It's not even illegal. It's just not cool. | |||
Vyper Kodondo Raging Venom Since: 11-18-05 From: Final Fantasy Fire Last post: 6442 days Last view: 6442 days |
| ||
Originally posted by SilvershieldNo, Clinton was impeached for purjury. He lied about the situation with Monica Lewinski, which was later proven to be true. |
|||
Silvershield 580 Since: 11-19-05 From: Emerson, New Jersey Last post: 6437 days Last view: 6425 days |
| ||
I know, but why should his personal sexual relations be an appropriate topic for him to be questioned about under oath? | |||
Vyper Kodondo Raging Venom Since: 11-18-05 From: Final Fantasy Fire Last post: 6442 days Last view: 6442 days |
| ||
Probably not, but that's not my issue. Take it up with the judge that tried him. | |||
Silvershield 580 Since: 11-19-05 From: Emerson, New Jersey Last post: 6437 days Last view: 6425 days |
| ||
I kinda meant it as a real question...on what grounds was information regarding his extramarital affair brought into a court of law? | |||
Arwon Bazu Since: 11-18-05 From: Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia Last post: 6427 days Last view: 6426 days |
| ||
I think this is where I exp |
|||
geeogree Red Cheep-cheep Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6440 days Last view: 6425 days |
| ||
SS: it had to do with the fact that he was fooling around with someone he worked with....
and then he lied under oath about it... THAT is why he was impeached.... because he lied under oath... yeah, it was about a blow job, but he still lied under oath.... which I know see that Vyper already mentioned anyway.... the point is that Monica Lewinski worked for Clinton.... that's generally seen as a no no |
|||
Thexare Metal battleaxe Off to better places Since: 11-18-05 Last post: 6425 days Last view: 6425 days |
| ||
Originally posted by geeogree Yes, but what Silvershield is asking is why it was brought up in the legal system to begin with. So, yeah, way to dodge the question, geeo. |
|||
Rom Manic Since: 12-18-05 From: Detroit, WHAT?! Last post: 6425 days Last view: 6425 days |
| ||
I think this article points out that it was Kerry who tampered with the ballots.... | |||
Young Guru Snifit Since: 11-18-05 From: Notre Dame, IN Last post: 6432 days Last view: 6425 days |
| ||
It was brought into court because of a sexual harasment suit. Employers, or anyone seen to be in a more powerful possition, can be tried for sexual harasement for having relations with their subordinates. It's the state of the world we live in. The fact is, when he was being questioned (under oath), he decided to lie instead of telling the truth. Purjury is grounds for impeachment, and impeachment does not necessarily result in expulsion from office. The situation for which he committed purjury was not one of enough consequence to merrit removal from office, just a mark of shame from impeachment. | |||
Thexare Metal battleaxe Off to better places Since: 11-18-05 Last post: 6425 days Last view: 6425 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Young Guru There we go, that's the answer we were after (I think). See, geeogree, that wouldn't have been so hard. |
Pages: 1 2 | Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - World Affairs/Debate - Ballot Tampering | | |