(Link to AcmlmWiki) Offline: thank ||bass
Register | Login
Views: 13,040,846
Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album
11-04-24 10:50 PM
0 users currently in Help, Suggestions, Bug Reports.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - Help, Suggestions, Bug Reports - Ban Timer New poll | |
Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
Tommathy









Since: 11-17-05
From: Cloud Nine, Turn Left and I'm There~

Last post: 6469 days
Last view: 6469 days
Skype
Posted on 03-26-06 03:01 AM Link | Quote
Are ban times coded into the board, or does someone have to remember to remove them?
Thexare

Metal battleaxe
Off to better places








Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6469 days
Last view: 6469 days
Posted on 03-26-06 03:05 AM Link | Quote
Someone has to remember to remove them, and care enough to do so.

The latter has been the cause of many late unbannings.
Deleted User
Banned


 





Since: 05-08-06

Last post: None
Last view: 6469 days
Posted on 03-26-06 03:06 AM Link | Quote
There once was a ban timer that went only up until 24 hours, but that was in 1.A3. Now, they just have to remember.
asdf

Link's Awakening
‭‮‭‮ಠ_ಠ








Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6470 days
Last view: 6469 days
Posted on 03-26-06 05:27 AM Link | Quote
Ban timing would be a fairly useless thing anyhow. All the banned user has to do in the scenario that their unbanning is not remembered is PM an admin to tell them that their banning is up. That's all there is to it.
Ailure

Mr. Shine
I just want peace...








Since: 11-17-05
From: Sweden

Last post: 6469 days
Last view: 6469 days
Posted on 03-26-06 07:05 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by stag910 +
There once was a ban timer that went only up until 24 hours, but that was in 1.A3. Now, they just have to remember.
That was a softban.

The concept of softban still confuses me to this day. It seemed something a full moderator did whenever a admin wasn't around... it was there for minor offences orginally.
Tarale

2710
Affected by 'Princess Bitch-Face Syndrome' ++++!!
Persona non grata


 





Since: 11-17-05
From: Adelaide, Australia

Last post: 6469 days
Last view: 6469 days
Posted on 03-26-06 07:36 AM Link | Quote
Yeah, softbans were an emergency/minor offense thing that could be used if necessary.

So, say a spammer turned up and just started crapflooding, they could be softbanned in the interim till an admin came with a real banstick
Danielle

6730
Administratorrrr
HELLO THERE









Since: 11-17-05
From: California
Rate me
^_^

Last post: 6470 days
Last view: 6469 days
Skype
Posted on 03-26-06 03:46 PM Link | Quote
I used to think there was a timer, but.. I figured that out when I got on staff.

If a user isn't unbanned when we said they will be, then like asdf said, they can PM a staffer and we'll take care of it. People that rereg when they don't get unbanned...
Thoughtless
[Danielle] Thoughtless is my secret lover
[Danielle] *flutters eyelashes*
[Thoughtless] SECRET IS OUT

I miss my two pussies :( (Part II)


 





Since: 11-17-05
From: PR

Last post: 6469 days
Last view: 6469 days
Posted on 03-26-06 10:28 PM Link | Quote
Eh. I think the current way of handling bans is the best one.

Because we all know Xk and timers don't mix well.
Danielle

6730
Administratorrrr
HELLO THERE









Since: 11-17-05
From: California
Rate me
^_^

Last post: 6470 days
Last view: 6469 days
Skype
Posted on 03-27-06 01:49 AM Link | Quote
That's very true. Maybe that's why we no longer have softbans! YOU'VE SOLVED THE MYSTERY!!!!!
asdf

Link's Awakening
‭‮‭‮ಠ_ಠ








Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6470 days
Last view: 6469 days
Posted on 03-27-06 01:51 AM Link | Quote
Thoughtless, you are a genius. I can only imagine the possibilties of the bad events that could've happened if softbans still existed. Like everyone being banned for 24 years.
Danielle

6730
Administratorrrr
HELLO THERE









Since: 11-17-05
From: California
Rate me
^_^

Last post: 6470 days
Last view: 6469 days
Skype
Posted on 03-27-06 01:57 AM Link | Quote
I think he would notice if he was the only one who wasn't in gray paint...
Skydude

Armos Knight








Since: 02-18-06
From: Stanford, CA

Last post: 6742 days
Last view: 6742 days
Posted on 03-27-06 02:11 AM Link | Quote
I think that if Xkeeper wrote in an unban timer, then when it got to zero, rather than unbanning the user, it would erase all traces of that user's existence. And not just on the board, but on all of the internet. Somehow.
Xkeeper
Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is.


 





Since: 11-17-05
From: Henderson, Nevada

Last post: 6469 days
Last view: 6469 days
Skype
Posted on 03-27-06 03:17 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Thoughtless
Eh. I think the current way of handling bans is the best one.

Because we all know Xk and timers don't mix well.

Timers only don't mix with me when I haven't slept in a while (which, lately, is turning into a daily occurance)

Really, most timers work well. It's just that when one of them messes up (not often, amazingly) I have enough time to fix it before it's supposed to go off.

Which is why you should generally make sure that stuff works first, but...
Emptyeye

Oneofthebiggestlegendsand
starseverinthis...GOD!
Ceremonial Full Moderator


 





Since: 11-17-05
From: I DUNNOOOOOOOO!!

Last post: 6469 days
Last view: 6469 days
Posted on 03-31-06 11:53 PM Link | Quote
Generally, XKeeper's timers work fine from my understanding; it's user (READ: XK) input error that causes the catastrophes.

Take the blow-up-the-board timer for instance. It worked exactly like it was supposed to; the reason the board blew up was because XK was screwing around with it and accidentally set the timer to 10AM of that day--which had already passed.

GAME AVER.
Xkeeper
Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is.


 





Since: 11-17-05
From: Henderson, Nevada

Last post: 6469 days
Last view: 6469 days
Skype
Posted on 04-01-06 12:03 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Emptyeye
Generally, XKeeper's timers work fine from my understanding; it's user (READ: XK) input error that causes the catastrophes.

Take the blow-up-the-board timer for instance. It worked exactly like it was supposed to; the reason the board blew up was because XK was screwing around with it and accidentally set the timer to 10AM of that day--which had already passed.

GAME AVER.

Also known as "Oops, mktime uses 24-hour format"

My latest timer (here) seems to work, minus the weird "-1" I get for the seconds occasionally.
HyperHacker

Star Mario
Finally being paid to code in VB! If only I still enjoyed that. <_<
Wii #7182 6487 4198 1828


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: Canada, w00t!
My computer's specs, if anyone gives a damn.
STOP TRUNCATING THIS >8^(

Last post: 6469 days
Last view: 6469 days
Posted on 04-01-06 04:37 AM Link | Quote
Well except that you linked to thread.php without specifying a thread. (Well OK, the timer works, but the rest of the page doesn't. )
Originally posted by Danielle
I think he would notice if he was the only one who wasn't in gray paint...

Soft bans didn't change name colours, so yeah, could be a problem.
Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - Help, Suggestions, Bug Reports - Ban Timer |


ABII

Acmlmboard 1.92.999, 9/17/2006
©2000-2006 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper

Page rendered in 0.057 seconds; used 430.86 kB (max 558.24 kB)