(Link to AcmlmWiki) Offline: thank ||bass
Register | Login
Views: 13,040,846
 Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album 		04-24-23 06:35 AM
0 users currently in General Gaming.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Gaming - Sonic Rush New poll | |
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
jordan_mega_gamer

Red Goomba


 





Since: 11-25-05
From: Vermont, USA

Last post: 5935 days
Last view: 5934 days
Posted on 11-26-05 02:36 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Ylle
So you're saying that if it can handle 3D, it should be 3D? I can't help but disagree on that. I always enjoyed the sonic games alot more when they were 2D.
I mean, 3D aint something that always makes a game better. I mean, tou can't say SM64 was better than SMB3 or SMW. right?

Sonic Rush does look very nice indeed. Alot Better than Shadow the Hedgehog in my personal opinion.


This may be a bitt off-topic, but I have to say that I always thought 3D mario was on equal standing with 2D. Maybe a little better, but certainly not worse. On the other hand, the 3D Metroid games drove me crazy.

Anyways. I haven't heard much of Sonic Rush, but I say 2D or 3D, I don't really care. It's gameplay that counts.
Alastor
Fearless Moderator Hero








Since: 11-17-05
From: An apartment by DigiPen, Redmond, Washington

Last post: 5908 days
Last view: 5908 days
Posted on 11-26-05 04:38 PM Link | Quote
Okay, I'm a little late to the party, but I would say Mario 64 was indeed better than SMB3 and SMW. SMB3 I just didn't really like; really, it has far too many instances of poor level design. The items were really the only things it had going for it. SMW was better, but too easy.

(edited by Alastor the Stylish on 11-26-05 03:42 PM)
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Gaming - Sonic Rush |


ABII

Acmlmboard 1.92.999, 9/17/2006
©2000-2006 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper

Page rendered in 0.011 seconds; used 355.64 kB (max 416.75 kB)