Register | Login | |||||
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
| |
0 users currently in General Chat. |
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Chat - Avatars | New poll | | |
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
What should all avatars be resized to if they're over this?Think! | 100x100 |
64.1%, 25 votes | 90x120 |
5.1%, 2 votes | 90x90 |
|
0.0%, 0 vote | 60x120 |
|
0.0%, 0 vote | 60x90 |
2.6%, 1 vote | 60x60 |
25.6%, 10 votes | Other |
2.6%, 1 vote | Multi-voting is disabled. 39 users have voted.
| |
User | Post | ||
Yoshi Dude TO HELL WITH THIS Since: 11-17-05 From: Fleepa Last post: 6431 days Last view: 6431 days |
| ||
Well that didn't take long. >8( |
|||
Xkeeper Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is. Since: 11-17-05 From: Henderson, Nevada Last post: 6431 days Last view: 6431 days |
| ||
who cares
the only difference is that if it would've been resized under the 60x60 rule anyway |
|||
Koitenshin +∞ Moblin Since: 12-24-05 From: Misery Last post: 6433 days Last view: 6433 days |
| ||
Like I said 100x100 allows for much more detail to be displayed. That avatar I am using now just doesn't look right at 60x60. | |||
Xkeeper Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is. Since: 11-17-05 From: Henderson, Nevada Last post: 6431 days Last view: 6431 days |
| ||
Actually, with resampling, it probably might.
With resizing, figuring out what mine is would be a real challenge. |
|||
Katt Newcomer Since: 01-28-06 From: New York Last post: 6817 days Last view: 6817 days |
| ||
100 x 100 is the basic avatar size and I am far too lazy to make an avatar just for this board. | |||
Hiryuu Sword Maiden Retired Admin Since: 11-17-05 From: Nerima District - Tokyo, Japan Last post: 6431 days Last view: 6431 days |
| ||
Yea.
Anyways, I've got a temp in there until I decide what I want to put. |
|||
Ailure Mr. Shine I just want peace... Since: 11-17-05 From: Sweden Last post: 6431 days Last view: 6431 days |
| ||
I actually suggested 100x100 since when I got someone over here from the RenAlert community it was like all.
OMG MY AVATAR IS ONLY 60x60. I guess the 100x100 limit is good, without being too big. Besides all my other avatars, are that size... expect for my Acmlm board one. Edit: Tried to upload a random picture that was little bigger than 100x100, but not much bigger. Hmm... so don't mind me if my avatar space keeps changing in the next 30 min. xD (edited by Ailura on 01-28-06 07:48 AM) |
|||
Xkeeper Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is. Since: 11-17-05 From: Henderson, Nevada Last post: 6431 days Last view: 6431 days |
| ||
Wll, we'll see how it works out, I guess... if a lot of them are just crap, we can always go back down to 60x60... | |||
Ailure Mr. Shine I just want peace... Since: 11-17-05 From: Sweden Last post: 6431 days Last view: 6431 days |
| ||
And as I just noticed, any picture over 100x100 loses it's transprancy.
That's why my current avatar have a black backround. Note that I probably will change it, or resize it manaully. xD |
|||
Xkeeper Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is. Since: 11-17-05 From: Henderson, Nevada Last post: 6431 days Last view: 6431 days |
| ||
Originally posted by AiluraLike how any animated GIF over 100x100 will lose its animation... It's just best to use 100x100 or smaller automatically, really... |
|||
Trapster King Dedede Since: 11-19-05 From: Sweden Last post: 6539 days Last view: 6431 days |
| ||
Well, I voted for 100x100 and I think everyone have already said the same thing.
More details in the avatar. And I agree. My avatars has been looking grainy at several occasions. |
|||
Alastor Fearless Moderator Hero Since: 11-17-05 From: An apartment by DigiPen, Redmond, Washington Last post: 6431 days Last view: 6431 days |
| ||
Now we HAVE to make big ugly 100x100 images or else it has ugly blank space. This is even worse than I *thought* it would be... | |||
Kattwah Acro RIP Acmlm's Board: Feb. 18 2007 Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6431 days Last view: 6431 days |
| ||
Despite the change, you wont catch me with a 100x100 avatar...
It goes against my tradition |
|||
Yoshi Dude TO HELL WITH THIS Since: 11-17-05 From: Fleepa Last post: 6431 days Last view: 6431 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Alastor the StylishI don't know what scheme you use, but I don't find the space leftover to stick out or anything. It's just the viewing that gets to me. And the boring memberlist. Getting rid of bios makes sense, but avatars? If avatars were a changeable feature like "show bio" was, that'd be okay. In fact, you should make sort of a classic view for us bitchy crabs. Simply don't display avatars bigger than 60x60. That'd make me a happy YD. How hard would that be to implement? Options are delightful~ |
|||
neotransotaku Sledge Brother Liberated from school...until MLK day Since: 11-17-05 From: In Hearst Field Annex... Last post: 6433 days Last view: 6431 days |
| ||
I wonder how bad is the stretching of 60x60 to 100x100? will it even stretch at all?
what the bluck? we have to upload our avatar's to the server? what's wrong with external linking it? (edited by neotransotaku on 01-28-06 01:53 PM) |
|||
Danielle 6730 Administratorrrr HELLO THERE Since: 11-17-05 From: California Rate me ^_^ Last post: 6432 days Last view: 6431 days |
| ||
Originally posted by neotransotaku That's exactly what I said when I realized that yesterday. I didn't even have my avatar saved to my computer, that was a waste of time. slfkjf >8( |
|||
Snow Tomato Snap Dragon Since: 12-31-05 From: NYC Last post: 6452 days Last view: 6437 days |
| ||
100 x 100 would pwn.
It's only 40 x 40 more pixels. It won't increase loading time or stretch tables.. so it makes sense. |
|||
neotransotaku Sledge Brother Liberated from school...until MLK day Since: 11-17-05 From: In Hearst Field Annex... Last post: 6433 days Last view: 6431 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Snow Tomato because the math side of me wants to be correct... you don't get 40 x 40 more pixels, you get 40 x 40 x 4 more pixels... 100 x 100 = 10, 000 60 x 60 = 3,600 40 x 40 = 1,600 10,000 - 3,600 = 6,400 = 1,600 * 4 |
|||
Snow Tomato Snap Dragon Since: 12-31-05 From: NYC Last post: 6452 days Last view: 6437 days |
| ||
Well, I was never good at math...
Still. Point is, it wouldn't make that large of a difference. (edited by Snow Tomato on 01-28-06 04:40 PM) |
|||
Hiryuu Sword Maiden Retired Admin Since: 11-17-05 From: Nerima District - Tokyo, Japan Last post: 6431 days Last view: 6431 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Snow Tomato Would? It already does. |
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Chat - Avatars | | |