 |
| Register | Login | |||||
 |
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
|
| Register | Login | |||||
|
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - - Posts by Kutske |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
| User | Post | ||
Kutske                  Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
Cruel Justice: I don't think kissing is sexual, more like cuddling to me. Sure, you can have an abstinant relationship and kiss. To me, an intimate relationship cannot be without kissing. "Relationship" is a very general word. You could have a relationship with a friend or a family member but not an intimate one. Intimate just means personal or close -- not sexual. Just like the words it or coffee aren't sexual by nature, they only become so through the use of innuendo. I tend to think that "relationship" needs to be paired with a qualifier, or replaced altogether, such as romantic relationship for the former, or friendship for the latter. |
|||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
| Yeah, why is that that males are the most frequent posters on "post yrself" topics? This, I find, is true across all sorts of message boards, regardeless of the general focus -- I've even seen one where all the pics were nude (*gasp*) but still, it was a sausage factory. Really, I'm curious as to the cause of this phenomenon. I'd give it five possibilities...
1) This is the internet -- the "girls" are guys who can't blow their cover, or are cops cracking down on internet predators. 2) Guys on the internet are far bigger sluts than the girls -- and they're desperate. 3) The males are less concerned with how they look, and are thus unafraid of posting pics of themselves -- the females are more self conscious of their body image. 4) Posting your picture on the internet is a risk at any time, in any place for a female, regardeless of her age or capability to defend herself. Thers freaks in them thar hills. 5) Most message boards are ~70% male, so it makes sense for more males to post pics -- pure statistical probability. I wonder... |
|||
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
| You could always whore your body out to whosever willing to pay. You know, I've actually got a few contacts, from back in the day. You're a skinny white boy, right? I know a group that's just itchin' for that sorta ass. Gimme a call sometime, babe, we'll make things happen. | |||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
Andy: MMX3 is the only game on MMX collection I didn't have (Other than the racing game I havn't unlocked yet). What was the music like on the old one? Say what now? I just rented the game and all six games are available -- there's no "unlocking" involved. insectduel: Think they remodled all the stage music from the SNES version of the game. The old music in MMX3 for SNES is just that plain or regular lyrics. If you beat MMX3 there's a gallery where you play Sigma's final music here. Not to mention the graphics and new fancy animation as well. I don't have Playstation but I know the diiferences between the SNES and Playstation version of MMX3. 1) The music changes are godawful and furthermore, sacrilidge -- heathen! 2) What "lyrics?" None of the SNES Megaman games - X or otherwise - had music with lyrics. 3) There is no graphical difference between MMX3 on SNES and MMX3 on PS1 -- they didn't update the graphics. I played the first three X games on SNES and they were really tough -- even playing as Zero, the games have become really easy from X4 onward. I still like them, the gameplay is solid, but I feel that the musical and graphical turn they took was for the worse. The first three games had a really magical feel to them, for me, but the next three (I haven't played 7/8 yet) didn't have it at all. I think the change from the tough, angular character models of the first three games to the highly-rounded, anime-inspired look of the next three was a major blunder, it's a real turnoff. The soundtracks also diminished considerably -- MMX/2/3 had an awesome techno/laser/rock fusion going for them, X4/5/6 just felt...ordinary. I mean, I still like 'em but...I just don't know...I just don't know if I like the direction Capcom as a company has gone in general since the SNES days... cpubasic13: I just don't know which controller seems better for the collection: PS2 or Gamecube? Well, considering that you'll spend an awful lot of time simultaneously holding in three buttons (dash, jump and shot/sword) you've got to think -- were you easily able to hold those three buttons in on the SNES controller? If so, go with PS2 because it's controller is virtually a clone of the SNES controller. If the buttons are too spread out, go for the GC version -- your thumb should easily fit over B, A and Y simultaneously... ...or, you could always do what the pros did and assign jump and shot to shoulder buttons... |
|||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
netscape: Actually it's a psychological tool. Preserves one's feelings. If I'm not interested in someone I have no problem with them figuring they're too good for me. No skin off my nose really, and it'll help their confidence for the next one. My point was, that was an everyday sort of example of what I see to be a growing social problem -- everyone thinks they are the be-all end-all, when in reality, a single person is just a drop of water in the vast ocean of life. It seems like everyone has inflated themselves up to be God on Earth, and it seems like people are more and more often making important descisions based solely upon their tiny, skewed view of the world. It's dangerous, it's what breeds war and fosters murder. Uncle Elmo: Either way, good luck Bella. It's good to see in this age of sexual equality, some women take the initiative. *drops the bomb* Now about paying for the meal... |
|||
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
Snow Tomato: Getting married under 21 is not the equivalent of putting a loaded gun to your head and pulling it. That's just ridiculously stupid. I think you misinterpreted what I said -- you said that "if you never try, you never know." I was pointing out that that sort of logic isn't rock-solid; you don't necessarily need to try something to "know." I wasn't equating the two things. Snow Tomato: And my point was, people are over glorifying marriage. It's not a devastation to your whole life if it ends. For some it is; some people lose their children, their pets, their house, their car, half or more of their savings and are indebted to pay child support for up to eighteen years or more. Financially, a divorce can devastate you, pretty much leaving you back where you were when you first moved away from your parents. Jomb: I'm the other person who voted yes. I voted yes because when 2 people are in love enough to get married that is always a good thing. As far as getting married young ruining someone's life, i dont believe that is HAS to be the case. In many places in the world, and in our past, people got married younger. It was'nt the end of the world. Our ancestors were not walking timebombs or moping around about it. In fact, they got alot done. I've always felt that maybe i'd get alot more done in my life if i did'nt have to waste so much energy dating and looking for a wife, or worrying about not finding one. I'm not saying that everyone should go get hitched right away when young, but that people should have the fundamental right to live their life however the hell they want to, so long as no one is being harmed (and not in some pansy ass, over-analyzed, psychological way). The government should not be dictating to people who and when they can marry, especially adult people. Two things. First, people in the past got married younger because they were only expected to live until their fourties, and they generally believed that as soon as you were physically able to bear children, you should be prepared to do so. Second, historically, marraige has had nothing to do with love -- it was something your parents or the elders of your tribe (etc.) forced you into, in order to tie two families together financially or politically. But anyway, I agree that the government need to have less say in the matter, but I tend to think that's true for most things... |
|||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
Cheyveyo Chowilawu: And this is why people call you an idiot, SamuraiX. There's a seventh game hidden, an originally-unreleased (in the US) kart racer-type of game. To earn it, last I checked, the three SNES MMX games had to be beaten. Samurai X? Is that who you think I am? Examine my profile a little closer, or read Deuteronomy 19:6 Anyway, he said that MMX3 was the only one on the collection that he "didn't have," implying that he somehow needed to "unlock" MMX3, which isn't the case. Also, the first time I played MMXC, the racing game was already there, so I wasn't aware it needed to be unlocked. Someone else must've been using my memory card... *glares evily at Grey* Oh, and... http://board.acmlm.org/profile.php?id=310 You fail. |
|||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
| I always hear, "such and such companies should join up and defeat other company." Well, it's time to see where we stand; if the three major console-producing companies were personified as humans of the opposite sex and inserted cartridge into slot A, which ungodly bastard child would you most anticipate the arrival of? G's up, votes down and yes, this will be on the test. | |||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
Snow Tomato: How could the word coffee be sexual by an innuendo? I can't think of anything. A man walks his date home after the evening and she asks, "You wanna come in for some coffee?" She ain't talking about Mocha Java. |
|||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
netscape: Bah we're getting off topic. What breeds war is lack of information and empathy, or lack of resources. People will fight for resources, competition is human nature. The way to combat that is to make sure people can get what they need and educate them to be open minded about other cultures so government demonizing campaigns to prep public support for war will fail. Murder has many causes stemming from from a range of issues. Once again, you've missed my point in it's entirety. But oh well. Hey, lemme ask you, what resources did America go to war in Iraq for? insectduel: I kinda wish males in general will stop using women as objects. Even, I been used as an object back at my senior year. Why do guys always doing this. Why? Because all men are evil and women are the only real good in the world, obviously. |
|||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
| Same here, I'm terribly unfond of the anime cutscenes they've interjected in more recent Megaman games. I also dislike in X5 how Alia chimes in every ninety seconds to update me on my own progress in the level -- I like having to figure things out on my own. I guess we'll have to wait and see how they handle ZX... | |||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
Simon Says: Hmmm, something's not right here... If Nintendo is a guy, then Sony would have to be a girl for them to have a child. If Sony is a girl, microsoft would have to be a guy for the same obvious reason. But if both Nintendo and microsoft are guys and would attemp having a child, someone could get seriously hurt! All three aren't made human at the same time -- in each pair, one turns male and one turns female. Or maybe they use asexual division or something, I don't know. GeckoYamori: Sony manufactured the SPC chip for the SNES, and the Playstation was originally supposed to be a CD addon for the console. For some unknown reason Nintendo decided to cancel the contract to partner with Philips without even notifying Sony about it, ultimately causing the biggest turning point in the history of the industry. My god, what if Nintendo and Sony went through with the NPX, and then Sega and Microsoft teamed up to produce a second Dreamcast, and Square still went to Nintendo's opposition console? Nintendo vs Sega would still be on, we might only have those two consoles in the mainstream, Sonic games wouldn't be multi-console, THPS would have went second-party, someone would have found a cure for cancer, George Bush wouldn't have been elected president, 9/11 wouldn't have happened...just think of how different the world would be today... Yes, Zamboni Flying Machine.: I'd like to see MORE competition. Otherwise Nintendo is going to be forced into a corner because there is no such thing as competing against Sony and Microsoft in the Grand War of Fiscal Attrition More competition howso? A fourth console? A third handheld? HyperHacker: Besides, any teaming up of two of the three would pretty much mean death to the third, meaning no competition. Without competition, prices skyrocket and quality plummets. I just suggested that if they were humans, which child would you most like to see produced -- the question isn't about two of the three companies permanently joining forces. |
|||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
Zamboni: Nonetheless there is more to the military than shooting and killing. Like bombing, capturing, torturing, brainwashing, hiding your homosexuality from your commanding officer, kissing up to the president regardeless of his competence, talking to the questionably-neutral military-employed psychiatrists so they can convince you that you aren't horrible or responsible for bloody murder, etc. netscape: I'll send the draft officer a greeting card from Canada myself. Wimp -- stand and fight. If you want to avoid the draft, get into politics and try to change the law so that others don't fall victim to it as well. But seriously, I was just on the phone with Canada the other day, and they said they don't want you, or any other draft-dodgers. Also, they said you guys look like dorks. You know, America is the scariest regieme on the face of the planet, I think if America "asked" them to, the Canadian government would forcably return draft-dodgers to US custody. Nowhere to run, nowhere to hide... |
|||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
netscape: You're funny. You need to chillax dude. Canadians have a peacenik culture. Their army tends to be used for foreign aid, and you think they like the US government that much you're nuts. I don't think you understand what I was implying; America could threaten Canada into giving up the draft-dodgers, because America is powerful (militarily speaking), and Canada's...not so powerful. |
|||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
Yoronosuku: insectduel is a man, too. Hypocritical, if he was generalizing.. and I hope you don't get the impression that I think males are 'evil', or unfavorable, or I purposly don't like them. I just have a tendancy to not make friends with them as easy, and it already isn't very easy ._.;; Just to clear it up so I don't sound like a sexist! Oh no, I'm just poking fun at insectduel. He has a certain...way with words. The same sort of way a atom bomb has with delicacy. |
|||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
Jomb: Kutske - That's true, but it does'nt change the fact that they got married younger and were generally fine I've known people frim India and in that region of the world where people have arranged marriages. They surprisingly have a higher success rate than ours do. You're kidding me, yes? That's because in most cases, divorce is either illegal or a major social taboo that'll ruin the life of the woman involved. Ares: Anyway, I say bad (generally speaking, of course). Most of everyone's responses were something like " yes as long as they are mature enough" or something of that ilk. Well, generally speaking the extremly young are characteristically not well respected for their maturity, ergo, *fizzle*. Probably not a good idea unless the people involved are notabley exeptional in there judgement. That's the great problem of the law -- some ten year olds are far more mature than some fourty year olds, however, we have to make rock-solid laws that are written in black-and-white terms, otherwise the laws will be bent out of shape to where they're moot. It's like statutory rape; the laws serve to add extra punishment to thirty year olds who literally rape prepubescent boys or girls, but the laws hurt the case of the nineteen year old with a seventeen year old girlfriend -- he's treated as no different than the thirty year old rapist in the eyes of the law, and is sent up the river for a decade or more, regardeless of whether the relationship was mutually decided upon. People want to interpret the law too strictly these days, while it needs to be taken on a case-by-case basis. |
|||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
Zamboni: First off America CANNOT attack Canada. There is no way in hell that they could economically survive it and there is no way that it could ever be a legal war. And since when has illegality ever stopped the Bush administration? Also, I said threaten, not attack. And I mean behind the curtains, not openly. There is a lot that goes on without the public's knowledge. I mean, the Black Sites have been operating for decades and we've just now found out about them. Don't you think there's a lot of other things we don't know about? Zamboni: Besides, remember Vietnam? Our army didn't even have a functional air force at the time...Yet America didn't attack us when we took in people who were on exodus from a regime trying to force them to fight in a morally reprehensible war. "Morality" has no place in war -- everyone think that they're good and right and that their enemy is wrong and evil, so why would you even use such a term? Morality is only used in war terminology when the public needs convinced to support the campaign. Zamboni: Vietnam? We sent irregular troops under the American flag and contributed heavily to the American war effort... So technically, you could call them "irregular hunters?" Kehehe... Zamboni: Outside observers of Canada need to understand the demographics of this nation before passing judgement. That isn't true to outside observers of any country? |
|||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
| Yeah yeah, I'm done. Sometimes I just like to see how far I can push before someone says something. Oh and, while we're on the topic, you know "monochromatic" doesn't mean "gray," right? Technically, something that was all red to the exclusion of other colors would be considered monochromatic. Try "#444444 feline." Or better yet, 1j/kg feline. That's one joule per kilogram (which is equal to one Gray, the SI unit of measure). | |||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
Grey: Well, I thought about it before you even mentioned it, Kutske, and the idea of whoring myself out isn't exactly an appealing on--- wait, "Back in the day..."? I'm several hundred years old -- and by several I mean seven. In those seven hundred years, I've been on both sides of the plate, so to speak, and I've probably still got a few favors I can pull, contacts listed in some tome somewhere. Dracoon: Whore yourself out. "You could always have sex with a hundred chicks for a buck each. Or just one really fat chick for a hundred bucks." |
|||
|
Kutske Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6670 days Last view: 6670 days |
| ||
| Recently, I've been thinking about that whole cliched Problem of A.I. Really, what constitutes a "human" as we think of the term? In the end, all that we are, all our thought is merely electrical signals jumping between synapses in the brain. Isn't that what a machine is? Isn't that how a computer operates?
But, more onto the subject at hand, I've been pondering a thing I've come to call organic binary. True or false, that's all binary is -- at the end of a day, absolutely everything that a computer could possibly do can be reduced to a simple string of zeroes and ones, albeit a very long string in some cases. Is it possible, then, that our blood could somehow be used as imput for a computer? Could we not somehow stain our blood in such a way as to imprint organic ones and zeroes that could be read by a specifically-designed machine? Certainly, no such technology currently exists, and if it ever will, we're still a long way off. I just wonder, because I'm not very scientifically-minded, do you think this is possible? That blood in a living creature, rather than mechanical triggers in a CPU, could be used to sustain binary and thus, computing? |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - - Posts by Kutske |
