 |
| Register | Login | |||||
 |
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
|
| Register | Login | |||||
|
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - - Posts by geeogree |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 |
| User | Post | ||
geeogree Red Cheep-cheep                    Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6334 days Last view: 6320 days |
| ||
Actually, I am going to back up my point from earlier  . I was reading on CNN and there was an article linked there that said that more legislation (or at least an equal amount) goes through government during divided governments compared to when one party controls everything.
So it's actually very possible that both sides are going to find some common ground and work together to push the country forward. I think I prefer it this way. It means that nothing too conservative will get through the house (or possibly senate depending on how things turn out) and nothing too liberal will get past the president. I'd much rather see a moderate agenda coming out of the US than an extreme one either way. |
|||
|
geeogree Red Cheep-cheep Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6334 days Last view: 6320 days |
| ||
| Guys get the exact same treatment in magazines and in many tv ads as girls do.
The "perfect" man has a six pack and big pectotral muscles. He's also hairless (somehow) and has perfect teeth. I guess I'm just trying to point out that guys get it too, just not to the same degree as girls do. |
|||
|
geeogree Red Cheep-cheep Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6334 days Last view: 6320 days |
| ||
| This is all I have to say.
We can't even accurately forecast the weather a week from today. Why do we believe that we can understand what is going to happen 10, 20, 50 or even 100 years from now. It's arrogance. Nothing more. |
|||
|
geeogree Red Cheep-cheep Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6334 days Last view: 6320 days |
| ||
| Arwon: go fuck yourself.
Dracoon: not really a big difference to me. But thanks for coming out. |
|||
|
geeogree Red Cheep-cheep Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6334 days Last view: 6320 days |
| ||
| Nope.
Not even close. |
|||
|
geeogree Red Cheep-cheep Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6334 days Last view: 6320 days |
| ||
| there's a difference between having the technology and having the infrastructure to support the new technology.
Infrastructure for hydrogen powered cars would take years to change over from gasoline. Plus the amount of money this would require is in the tens of billions (or hundreds potentially). Basically we aren't desperate enough to make the change yet. The change to a new fuel source will happen when the current fuel source becomes uneconomical to sustain. Plus the change won't be completed in a single go. Making enough cars and peple having enough time to switch over will take a long time. And in response to the question of "What happens when the gas goes away?" These same people that are making billions of dollars off of gasoline will somehow manage to also control the next fuel source and make billions of dollars. |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 |
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - - Posts by geeogree |
