(Link to AcmlmWiki) Offline: thank ||bass
Register | Login
Views: 13,040,846
Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album
04-30-24 03:06 AM
0 users currently in Help, Suggestions, Bug Reports.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - Help, Suggestions, Bug Reports - why no plain text sigs? New poll | |
Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
spiroth10

Paratroopa


 





Since: 01-28-06
From: USA

Last post: 6280 days
Last view: 6280 days
Posted on 12-30-06 11:29 PM Link | Quote
I understand that text headers got annoying (anyone who's been here for 3+ years knows that), but why sigs?

images in sigs, and full post layouts, take more bandwidth than, say a link saying visit my forum/blog/etc.
I know that with aboard, a big plus is customizable layouts in posts, but it is still a forum tradition to have basic text/image signatures.

did something happen to deny users this? New host rules/requirements? Or just l33t staff attitudes towards text?

I don't mean to offend any staff members here by asking, I just cannot fathom why it's such a big deal.

This board really has changed over the years... Acmlm has basically disappeared from the public eye, ads were added to the fourm, and now no text sigs/headers. wow.
Kailieann



 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6280 days
Last view: 6280 days
Posted on 12-30-06 11:32 PM Link | Quote
Ace is still around, if you know where to look.

The ads are there to pay for the server's host, same with just about any other site.

And the primary issue is people not putting in visible separators for their signatures, so that they have a tendency to blend together with the rest of the post. Which is extremely annoying.
Hiryuu

Sword Maiden
Retired Admin








Since: 11-17-05
From: Nerima District - Tokyo, Japan

Last post: 6280 days
Last view: 6280 days
Posted on 12-30-06 11:52 PM Link | Quote
Because no one's ever made a good one.

Show me a good layout with ASCII art.
Dr Ice64

Goomba








Since: 12-29-06

Last post: 6327 days
Last view: 6281 days
Posted on 12-31-06 02:20 AM Link | Quote
Wtf though, nobody's perfect. I mean what the heck is ACII art?
Kailieann



 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6280 days
Last view: 6280 days
Posted on 12-31-06 03:18 AM Link | Quote
We don't expect people to be perfect. We expect them to read the rules and display a shred of common sense.
Dr_Death16

970


 





Since: 05-07-06
From: Iowa

Last post: 6280 days
Last view: 6280 days
Posted on 12-31-06 03:22 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by spiroth10
I understand that text headers got annoying (anyone who's been here for 3+ years knows that), but why sigs?
Just as Kail already said, they're annoying for the same reason as plain-text headers; and 90% of the time this is due to a lack of separation between those and the actual post.
Originally posted by spiroth10
images in sigs, and full post layouts, take more bandwidth than, say a link saying visit my forum/blog/etc.
I know that with aboard, a big plus is customizable layouts in posts, but it is still a forum tradition to have basic text/image signatures.
Nobody is complaining about bandwidth, if Xkeeper told us that we needed to cut down on bandwidth by removing layouts, we'd do it. But there's no such thing going on, so your point is moot. Plain-text signatures are usually half intelligent (links to personal forums, etc.) and half idiotic (random phrases and statements that have no relevance to anything at all.) so while they are "tradition", they're not important, nor even good in most cases.
Originally posted by spiroth10
did something happen to deny users this? New host rules/requirements? Or just l33t staff attitudes towards text?
No, people (especially admin.) got tired of trying to pick out what is a post and what is the plain text header/footer in posts by certain users. Therefore, they wanted such practices to be looked down upon. I don't see what's wrong with supporting clarity in posts.
Originally posted by spiroth10
I don't mean to offend any staff members here by asking, I just cannot fathom why it's such a big deal.
Frankly, nobody really cared before and nor will they care after, because it isn't a big deal. Just keeping clarity in posts is the whole point, and most people are able to do that with their headers/footers.
Originally posted by spiroth10
This board really has changed over the years... Acmlm has basically disappeared from the public eye, ads were added to the fourm, and now no text sigs/headers. wow.
Okay. Well, Acmlm is around, so you lose on that point. The ads are necessary, if you understand the concept of hosting, you should know that money is needed to support the board in this respect. Go cry about them somewhere else, because they're not terrible ads at all.
D 2007
D


 





Since: 02-19-06

Last post: 6327 days
Last view: 6327 days
Posted on 12-31-06 03:43 AM Link | Quote
There's a big difference between:

Blah blah blah blah blah.

Blah blah blah, blah.
and

Blah blah blah blah blah.

Blah blah blah, blah.

One of those is clearly a signature, the other isn't clear at all. That's what we're looking for here.



I understand that text headers got annoying (anyone who's been here for 3+ years knows that), but why sigs?

images in sigs, and full post layouts, take more bandwidth than, say a link saying visit my forum/blog/etc.
I know that with aboard, a big plus is customizable layouts in posts, but it is still a forum tradition to have basic text/image signatures.

did something happen to deny users this? New host rules/requirements? Or just l33t staff attitudes towards text?

I don't mean to offend any staff members here by asking, I just cannot fathom why it's such a big deal.

This board really has changed over the years... Acmlm has basically disappeared from the public eye, ads were added to the fourm, and now no text sigs/headers. wow.
Plain text sigs blend in too much to the actual post, leading to confusion and annoyance, just like headers. It's basically been decided by a lot of board users who got fed up with it.

Basic image signatures are still fine, as long as you don't do anything stupid like make a 800x600 image into your signature (hi, Dr_Ice64)...

Acmlm's still around, he's just not on the board as much (we're talking to him right now even), the ads were added to pay for hosting and to pay for future expansion (like a project I'm working on), and the banning of plaintext sigs is nothing new at all.

*D shrugs


(edited by D on 12-30-06 09:43 PM)
(edited by D on 12-30-06 09:46 PM)
pikaguy900

Sparky


 





Since: 08-10-06

Last post: 6293 days
Last view: 6280 days
Posted on 12-31-06 04:02 AM Link | Quote
On the same subject, here's an idea (that I'm sure will get shot down quickly, but what's the harm in trying?): Why not a little notice in "Edit Profile" that says "NO PLAIN-TEXT SIGNATURES" (or something like that), like with the Header? (That one says "DO NOT PUT TEXT HERE." in big, bold, red text.) That way, people will know NOT to put plaintext there. Though, I'm confused now. Is it that plain-text sigs are banned no matter what, or that they're okay as long as it's easy to tell where the post itself is and where the post ends and signature begins? I would appreciate some clarification here, please.
Simon Belmont
Except I'm totally fucking hyped about Dracula X: Chronicles.








Since: 11-18-05
From: Pittsburgh

Last post: 6280 days
Last view: 6280 days
Posted on 12-31-06 04:07 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by pikaguy900
Though, I'm confused now. Is it that plain-text sigs are banned no matter what, or that they're okay as long as it's easy to tell where the post itself is and where the post ends and signature begins? I would appreciate some clarification here, please.


All we're asking for is a little bit of seperation. as much as a "---", or a bold or color tag, to show that your post has ended and your signature has begun.
HyperHacker

Star Mario
Finally being paid to code in VB! If only I still enjoyed that. <_<
Wii #7182 6487 4198 1828


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: Canada, w00t!
My computer's specs, if anyone gives a damn.
STOP TRUNCATING THIS >8^(

Last post: 6280 days
Last view: 6280 days
Posted on 12-31-06 05:30 AM Link | Quote
There's one thing I don't get... isn't the automatic addition of "-------------" before each sig supposed to solve this issue?
Dr_Death16

970


 





Since: 05-07-06
From: Iowa

Last post: 6280 days
Last view: 6280 days
Posted on 12-31-06 05:31 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Alice
There's one thing I don't get... isn't the automatic addition of "-------------" before each sig supposed to solve this issue?
It's an option that can be set to "None", though.
Kailieann



 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6280 days
Last view: 6280 days
Posted on 12-31-06 04:46 PM Link | Quote
In glancing at editprofile.php, though, said option appears to default to 'none', and it's buried in the middle of all the other miscellaneous options instead of up with the signature itself.
Milly

Metal axe
mrew~
We're downpouring again!

Affected by 'wtf I'm posting Syndrome'








Since: 11-17-05
From: Mirabel, Québec, Canada

Last post: 6297 days
Last view: 6280 days
Posted on 12-31-06 07:11 PM Link | Quote
Dashes (2346)
Line (41)
Full horizontal line (83)
None (100)

"--------------------" still seems to be the default one, but I use the least common (or would if I had layouts enabled) ... and the option is down there because it's just a viewing option that doesn't affect your post layout

But the whole point of this option was exactly the problem we have here ... I remember seeing plain text signatures on older boards that had no separator, and it did get confusing at times ...

I'd go with a font tag or something to separate plain text signatures, putting a separator in there doesn't look as good when there's already one
Gywall

Coney








Since: 11-20-05
From: England!

Last post: 6282 days
Last view: 6280 days
Posted on 12-31-06 07:29 PM Link | Quote
Plain text can be often manipulated into getting confused with a post. It's different if it's part of a layout where it's clearly placed. Some people just stuff stupid comments like "hi, im *insert username here*" where the post would example like: "hi, im *username*i think thats good"

So you get a picture. But sometimes the signatures get the same fate, where people either stick a load of crap there, or someone confuses it with a post.
HyperHacker

Star Mario
Finally being paid to code in VB! If only I still enjoyed that. <_<
Wii #7182 6487 4198 1828


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: Canada, w00t!
My computer's specs, if anyone gives a damn.
STOP TRUNCATING THIS >8^(

Last post: 6280 days
Last view: 6280 days
Posted on 01-01-07 02:58 AM Link | Quote
Last I checked dashes was the default.
Originally posted by Dr_Death16
Originally posted by Alice
There's one thing I don't get... isn't the automatic addition of "-------------" before each sig supposed to solve this issue?
It's an option that can be set to "None", though.

Yes, and if you don't like it that way, it can also be not set to "None".
Kailieann



 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6280 days
Last view: 6280 days
Posted on 01-01-07 08:44 AM Link | Quote
Which tends to interfere with most decent layouts.
HyperHacker

Star Mario
Finally being paid to code in VB! If only I still enjoyed that. <_<
Wii #7182 6487 4198 1828


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: Canada, w00t!
My computer's specs, if anyone gives a damn.
STOP TRUNCATING THIS >8^(

Last post: 6280 days
Last view: 6280 days
Posted on 01-01-07 08:44 AM Link | Quote
Meh, I haven't yet seen one where it bothered me.
Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - Help, Suggestions, Bug Reports - why no plain text sigs? |


ABII

Acmlmboard 1.92.999, 9/17/2006
©2000-2006 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper

Page rendered in 0.019 seconds; used 436.79 kB (max 556.22 kB)