(Link to AcmlmWiki) Offline: thank ||bass
Register | Login
Views: 13,040,846
 Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album 		04-23-23 12:55 PM
0 users currently in Announcements.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - Announcements - New SMW/Pokémon Hacking regulations New poll | |
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
Dan

Purple Leever


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 5916 days
Last view: 5907 days
Posted on 08-21-06 04:22 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by p_ac
I really think you should apply this brilliant system to ROM Hacking too. I forsee the arrival of many more I gOt a UZI iN my PockEt lol s.


I really think they shouldn't. You people are inventing problems that don't actually exist, as most of the bad behaviour was limited to the game specific hacking forums. Also, there's 6 moderators on the forum, there shouldn't be a problem getting rid of posts that are potentially stupid.
Thexare

Metal battleaxe
Off to better places








Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 5908 days
Last view: 5907 days
Posted on 08-21-06 09:27 AM Link | Quote
It might also get rid of the jackasses described in this post:

Originally posted by Xkeeper
Originally posted by Sukasa +
Yeah, The ROM hacking forum was excluded because some higher-profile hackers didn't want to (I guess wouldn't) go through the aprroval process, and so the forum was left as is so they wouldn't be excluded.

I personally thought the ROM hacking forum should also have been approval only, but... I guess we'll just see how it goes.

Too many stuckup morons who take more time bitching about why a system sucks than just posting an application saying "Hello I am ___(NAME)___ and such hi."

acillatem98

Crow








Since: 11-18-05
From: Barberton, Ohio

Last post: 5912 days
Last view: 5908 days
Posted on 08-21-06 10:35 AM Link | Quote
I never understood why that was so hard to do. If they don't like the approval system, then they can just leave.

It's not THAT difficult is it?
Alastor
Fearless Moderator Hero








Since: 11-17-05
From: An apartment by DigiPen, Redmond, Washington

Last post: 5907 days
Last view: 5907 days
Posted on 08-21-06 11:58 PM Link | Quote
But if they did that, they wouldn't get to complain.
Glyphodon



 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 5948 days
Last view: 5929 days
Posted on 08-22-06 12:57 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by acillatem98
I never understood why that was so hard to do. If they don't like the approval system, then they can just leave.

It's not THAT difficult is it?


That's a great idea--everytime you have a problem with someplace, abandon it completely. Only it's a terrible idea and you suck.

Acmlm's isn't a totally terrible place, and as long as I have a keyboard and a few working fingers, I will never stop listing its faults until it is a totally awesome place.

We complainers, we complain... because we hate.

Also, because we care.

And hate.

Mostly hate.

But still, the caring.
Tatrion
<_<;


 





Since: 11-17-05

Last post: 5908 days
Last view: 5907 days
Posted on 08-22-06 08:20 AM Link | Quote
GP, be nice to acillatem, he's my man.

Anyway, to add some on-topic to this post, I'm fine with the system. It's... fine. That's it, really.
MathOnNapkins

1100

In SPC700 HELL


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 5907 days
Last view: 5907 days
Posted on 08-25-06 06:26 AM Link | Quote
Making an approval thread is a small price to pay to filter out idiocy. If someone's too proud to ask for approval that's a serious ego problem.
Alastor
Fearless Moderator Hero








Since: 11-17-05
From: An apartment by DigiPen, Redmond, Washington

Last post: 5907 days
Last view: 5907 days
Posted on 08-25-06 11:46 PM Link | Quote
Not to mention the vast majority of our idiots can't figure out how to get approval apparently... It's so worth it.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - Announcements - New SMW/Pokémon Hacking regulations |


ABII

Acmlmboard 1.92.999, 9/17/2006
©2000-2006 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper

Page rendered in 0.016 seconds; used 379.30 kB (max 464.42 kB)