Originally posted by

---

How? Telco companies (I'm looking at you, AT&T) have actually, very bluntly stated that they plan to do exactly what savetheinternet.com thinks they're going to do.

I'm not seeing any "bias speculation" here...

---

Originally posted by Alastor the Stylish

---

What the hell is with this television analogy. Do you people have even the slightest idea just how different the systems are? It's. Gah.

---

Originally posted by wikipedia

---

Those favoring neutrality include some content providers such as Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft, large communication companies, academics, Internet engineers, corporate media critics, political bloggers, and many Political Action Committees. They contend that any non-neutral scheme could allow ISP's to unfairly discriminate and control which data they prioritize, such as data from their own sponsors or media interests, resulting in a two-tiered Internet. They generally claim that passage of the COPE Act turns control of the Internet over to the carriers, who will then convert it into something resembling cable TV.

---

Originally posted by ||bass

---

I'm against anything that interferes with letting buisness alone. The government's job is not to play mommy and daddy for the net. Read the wiki article on net neutraility. Most of the arguements AGAINST net neutrality are more convincing than the ones in favor.

---