 |
| Register | Login | |||||
 |
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
|
| Register | Login | |||||
|
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
| 0 users currently in World Affairs/Debate. |
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - World Affairs/Debate - Assuming Jesus had a child... |
New poll |  | Thread closed |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
| User | Post | ||
Skreename Giant Red Paratroopa                 Since: 11-18-05 Last post: 6302 days Last view: 6295 days |
| ||
| Okay, I may be weird, but I don't think that's dealing directly with sex. Seems more precisely related to wet dreams and the like. Either way, it's not a very useful quote.
(As for what Silvershield said, lets not forget the parts forbidding mixing fabrics/crops/etc, eating shellfish, and various other things.) |
|||
|
C:/xkas bio.asm Compiled ASM code     Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6296 days Last view: 6295 days |
| ||
well, I basically posted it so someone could explain me what it is supposed to mean |
|||
Jomb Deddorokku  Since: 12-03-05 From: purgatory Last post: 6298 days Last view: 6298 days |
| ||
| Maybe I'm wrong, heck i'm not even a christian, but i did take a college class on comparative religions. In that class i was taught that in christianity, eve's eating of the apple was symbolic of knowledge of sex, which is the origional sin. This is why everyone is said to be born with a burden of sin, because we came out of origional sin. | |||
ziffhasnoaim/password Snifit Since: 06-07-06 Last post: 6487 days Last view: 6487 days |
| ||
| It depends on the dogmatic alignment of the church in question. If that church is the Church than original sin isn't particularly important. All humans sin is our belief. Some protestant denominations which do later-life baptisms wash away the Original Sin in these baptisms.
And yeah, Jewish law is rather specific about human bodily discharges. However, Christians aren't Jews and it has to be understood that most Old Testament laws don't really apply to us. We loves our shellfish. |
|||
Billiards Koopa Red Paratroopa  Since: 04-21-06 From: Far away from a carnival, one ride tried to kill me (no lie) Last post: 6502 days Last view: 6502 days |
| ||
| You saying I ain't a Christian cause I hate shellfish? | |||
|
Skreename Giant Red Paratroopa Since: 11-18-05 Last post: 6302 days Last view: 6295 days |
| ||
| No. No he isn't. He's saying that there's enough people in general who do to guarantee that by him saying "we", he's not just referring to himself and the voices in his head.
I like oysters. Put them in a stew... Or fried clams... yum! (In other news: If that was a joke, it wasn't a very good one.) |
|||
|
Billiards Koopa Red Paratroopa Since: 04-21-06 From: Far away from a carnival, one ride tried to kill me (no lie) Last post: 6502 days Last view: 6502 days |
| ||
| Aww...noone here appreciates my humor... | |||
Silvershield   580  Since: 11-19-05 From: Emerson, New Jersey Last post: 6308 days Last view: 6295 days |
| ||
Originally posted by JombCould've been a matter of a particular professor's perception of the issue. I've had my share of teachers who profess specific views that are somewhat less than plausible, or at least less than popular, and sometimes they need to be taken with a grain of salt. |
|||
geeogree Red Cheep-cheep Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6310 days Last view: 6295 days |
| ||
| if sex/gender didn't exist then how could there be a man and a woman? I mean, there would just be 2 people in the garden.... not a man and a woman.... (edited by geeogree on 06-12-06 12:31 AM) |
|||
|
Billiards Koopa Red Paratroopa Since: 04-21-06 From: Far away from a carnival, one ride tried to kill me (no lie) Last post: 6502 days Last view: 6502 days |
| ||
| I find that God not wanting us to have sex is like handing a Crack Addict some Cocane and punishng him for snorting it. Retarded! | |||
beneficii Broom Hatter Since: 11-18-05 Last post: 6299 days Last view: 6295 days |
| ||
| Er, this thread seems to be veering off-topic chotto (a bit). It seems like it's becoming a discussion just about sex being the original sin, which is fine as part of the subject, but you must remember there are other portions of the subject to discuss, such as whether the Gnostics were true. This discussion, unfortunately, seems to be getting into a discussion of sex as the original sin for its own sake. Please veer back or start a new thread on sex being the original sin. | |||
|
Silvershield 580 Since: 11-19-05 From: Emerson, New Jersey Last post: 6308 days Last view: 6295 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Billiards Koopa...to repeat, no sane theologian will tell you that God does not want use to have sex. Originally posted by beneficiiMaybe that's just an indication that the original topic has either been exhausted or is simply not as engaging as what the thread's become. Why is it such common practice to encourage members to discuss a topic that, if left to themselves, they would not pursue? Why is it the job of the moderator to tell posters what they should or should not be writing about? It's not as if the thread starter is complaining that his topic has been hijacked or anything like that, so why not just leave well-enough alone? (In retrospect, that sounds a bit aggressive, even though it's not intended to. So, don't read too far into it.) |
|||
Arwon Bazu Since: 11-18-05 From: Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia Last post: 6297 days Last view: 6296 days |
| ||
| I for once agree with SS. Let topic drift be! | |||
|
beneficii Broom Hatter Since: 11-18-05 Last post: 6299 days Last view: 6295 days |
| ||
| Er, again, if you have a problem with a decision by the moderating staff, please PM the moderator in question directly or an admin.
Arwon, At the very least, try to tie it into the original subject. |
|||
|
Arwon Bazu Since: 11-18-05 From: Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia Last post: 6297 days Last view: 6296 days |
| ||
| But there hasn't been a decision?
Also, sex and Christianity is, very clearly, the topic of the thread. |
|||
|
Billiards Koopa Red Paratroopa Since: 04-21-06 From: Far away from a carnival, one ride tried to kill me (no lie) Last post: 6502 days Last view: 6502 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Silvershield...Originally posted by Billiards Koopa...to repeat, no sane theologian will tell you that God does not want use to have sex.! I know, I meant that the idea of God not wanting us to have sex was retarded. |
|||
|
Kingpin Since: 11-21-05 From: Amarillo, TX Last post: 6301 days Last view: 6295 days |
| ||
| Sex isnt "the original sin." Sex is a carnal sin. Since we are all born because of sex, we are imperfect. Thats why Jesus had to have a virgin birth, so he would be perfect. | |||
|
C:/xkas bio.asm Compiled ASM code Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6296 days Last view: 6295 days |
| ||
| that doesn't have any sence, many lifeform can reproduce without sex but that doesn't mean they're 'perfect', and I don't think Jesus was 'perfect' maybe he was 'holy' but not 'perfect' since he probably did some mistake in his life (edited by Bio.exe on 06-12-06 01:20 PM) (edited by Bio.exe on 06-12-06 01:21 PM) |
|||
|
Kingpin Since: 11-21-05 From: Amarillo, TX Last post: 6301 days Last view: 6295 days |
| ||
| Um, first off, Jesus was perfect. He never sinned. Secondly, yeah, many lifeforms reproduce without sex, but human beings are the only ones with souls. | |||
|
C:/xkas bio.asm Compiled ASM code Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6296 days Last view: 6295 days |
| ||
| prove me that other animal don't have souls... or that human have souls
...or even better tell me the exact point in the evolution where human started to have soul 
and to be 'perfect' you need more that have never sinned also, according to what you said, if I change my DNA to be able to reproduce without sex, then all my son will be 'perfect' |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - World Affairs/Debate - Assuming Jesus had a child... |
| Thread closed |
