(Link to AcmlmWiki) Offline: thank ||bass
Register | Login
Views: 13,040,846
Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album
05-15-24 07:23 PM
0 users currently in World Affairs/Debate.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - World Affairs/Debate - 11? New poll | |
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
Deleted User
Banned


 





Since: 05-08-06

Last post: None
Last view: 6296 days
Posted on 04-26-06 08:15 PM Link | Quote

Not too long ago, Cruel Justice made a thread about the weird 11 deal. Well, since that's an old thread, and there was only one post... What does anyone think? I seriously think NSNick has just got a problem admitting it, but, I think that was all NOT, a coincidence. I mean really, think about it.

I'm 100000000 % sure that the names with 11 letters, passengers of the planes digits that add up to 11, weird Q33 NY that translates into the plane crashing into twin towers symbol, and anything else, did NOT just happen to be. Take a look at the thread yourself people. If we were smart, we could've prevented 911 [by the way, 9 + 1 + 1 = 11]. As a matter of fact, do you think that's what they intended? Do you think they tried to play a game with us? Think about this........
Rom Manic









Since: 12-18-05
From: Detroit, WHAT?!

Last post: 6295 days
Last view: 6295 days
Posted on 04-26-06 08:27 PM Link | Quote
I think people have too much time on their hands. 9/11 was the arranged day, just like Friday is the arranged day I go to the bar with my friends.

But we don't throw our beer bottles at the Twin Towers to try and bring them down.
Deleted User
Banned


 





Since: 05-08-06

Last post: None
Last view: 6296 days
Posted on 04-26-06 08:31 PM Link | Quote

I agree with your first statement. But I also think you're missing the point. This was WAY more than arranged. They concocted based on OUR part also. Are we dealing with enemies smarter than that of we estimate?

Bush needs to go... All these "11's" were destroyed. Bush might be next? Too far? Well, lets wait and see what happens........ [not that I wouldn't be happy if he did, lol].
Skydude

Armos Knight








Since: 02-18-06
From: Stanford, CA

Last post: 6569 days
Last view: 6569 days
Posted on 04-26-06 08:38 PM Link | Quote
I recall seeing this before, and really, what you have to realize is that there are an infinite number of variables that you can use as numbers, such that you can manipulate them to get them to say something just like that. I also seem to recall reading in an article on that that the flight number they used to "prove" this was wrong anyway, making it even more meaningless.
Deleted User
Banned


 





Since: 05-08-06

Last post: None
Last view: 6296 days
Posted on 04-26-06 09:04 PM Link | Quote

No, I won't concede. That HAS to have meant something. That is not just random. OUR flight, turns into what really happened. There is NO way in hell that you can convince me otherwise. Although I would like to see this article please if you can find it.

If we knew this translation, 911 could've been prevented. That is what proves that it WAS something.
Skydude

Armos Knight








Since: 02-18-06
From: Stanford, CA

Last post: 6569 days
Last view: 6569 days
Posted on 04-26-06 09:06 PM Link | Quote
I think this is one thing you're referring to...

I have no idea what to search for for the 11 things.
Deleted User
Banned


 





Since: 05-08-06

Last post: None
Last view: 6296 days
Posted on 04-26-06 09:16 PM Link | Quote

"The actual flight designations of the airplanes striking the World Trade Center were American Airlines Flight 11 (first plane) and United Airlines Flight 175 (second plane)."

This as quoted by the article you gave me a link to [thank you]. Now let's look at this to see how I can override it.

American Airlines Flight "11." Yes folks, eleven. Also United Airlines Flight "175." 1 + 7 + 5 = 13. MINUS 2 for being the "SECOND" plane. Now, the Q33 NY that renders as that symbol, was a fake name for these airlines related to the crash. This symbol still relates to those airlines. Now to prove this, I need to know when the symbol was made. And maybe where. But still, those airlines relate to 11.
Skydude

Armos Knight








Since: 02-18-06
From: Stanford, CA

Last post: 6569 days
Last view: 6569 days
Posted on 04-26-06 09:18 PM Link | Quote
The symbol was made by someone playing around with WingDings who wanted to provide fodder for conspiracy theorists such as yourself.
Deleted User
Banned


 





Since: 05-08-06

Last post: None
Last view: 6296 days
Posted on 04-26-06 09:21 PM Link | Quote

Okay fine, while that was my strong defense, you still can't explain the other relations.
Skydude

Armos Knight








Since: 02-18-06
From: Stanford, CA

Last post: 6569 days
Last view: 6569 days
Posted on 04-26-06 09:23 PM Link | Quote
Because there's nothing to explain! They're meaningless! For example, 1 + 7 + 5 -2...you said subtract two because it was the second flight...but why subtract? Why not add, multiply, divide, take it to that power or root, take the log with that base, or any number of other operations?

Why?

I'll tell you why. Because it's arbitrary, and it gets an answer that makes you think there's something special where there isn't.
Young Guru

Snifit








Since: 11-18-05
From: Notre Dame, IN

Last post: 6302 days
Last view: 6295 days
Posted on 04-26-06 09:29 PM Link | Quote
Okay, so one of the attackers was clever enough to think of a way of making all things related to 9/11 in someway relate to the number 11. That's fine and dandy, give me a week I could probably find 100 flights leaving from all over the country, or just one area, that all equal some predetermined number. It's really not that difficult, and the probability of finding those numbers isn't hard. Maybe they even looked at flights for a bunch of days to try different numbers. The fact of the matter is, what in the name of God would have made anyone aware of the number 11. Is their some intrinsic value of the number 11 that all the national agencies should have been spending all their time looking at it. Think of it this way, it's just like a movie with a huge plot twist, like fight club, where once you know what the twist is it's pretty obvious to see all the clues that give it away, but in this situation the puzzle is many many times more complex with a whole lot of extraneous information that also merits people's time, so people need to stop blaming inteligence agencies for not having prevented 9/11.
Hawksun

Red Koopa








Since: 04-06-06
From: Canada

Last post: 6516 days
Last view: 6516 days
Posted on 04-26-06 09:35 PM Link | Quote
The only way of preventing 9/11 is to live in an alternate reality, which isn't possible. And Skydude said it, too much variables. If only one of them had changed your theory would be even more wrong.
Deleted User
Banned


 





Since: 05-08-06

Last post: None
Last view: 6296 days
Posted on 04-26-06 09:41 PM Link | Quote
It just seem like there's more to it. [Cruel Justice, where are you?] And besides, I'm not blaming anyone of anything, I'm just saying that there was a possibility of it being prevented [though now that that last item was rejected, I don't think it could've been prevented.

But hey anyone who doesn't agree; nine eleven = "Nevele Enin" Karudos, the Iraqi mastermind believed to have planned the attack.

EDIT: Woops, I forgot to say I was just kidding.


(edited by ||EyeL E Ss|| on 04-26-06 08:47 PM)
Ziff
B2BB
BACKTOBASICSBITCHES


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: A room

Last post: 6295 days
Last view: 6295 days
Posted on 04-26-06 09:44 PM Link | Quote
Numerology is irritating. I wrote an essay on it. It chafes.
Hawksun

Red Koopa








Since: 04-06-06
From: Canada

Last post: 6516 days
Last view: 6516 days
Posted on 04-26-06 09:46 PM Link | Quote
And maybe you got documents and/or proof that this "Nevele Enin Karudos" is the real mastermind? Mister Ben Laden is pretty much known as the real mastermind.
Deleted User
Banned


 





Since: 05-08-06

Last post: None
Last view: 6296 days
Posted on 04-26-06 09:47 PM Link | Quote

I was kidding...read my edit.
mattp

Red Paratroopa


 





Since: 03-04-06

Last post: 6560 days
Last view: 6560 days
Posted on 04-26-06 10:36 PM Link | Quote
I side with Plus. Numerology is stupid superstition with no real merit.
Ziff
B2BB
BACKTOBASICSBITCHES


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: A room

Last post: 6295 days
Last view: 6295 days
Posted on 04-26-06 11:49 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by mattp
I side with Plus. Numerology is stupid superstition with no real merit.


Then you've never studied it. There is SOME merit to certain forms of numerology. However, actually studying a lot of it is a head ache and most of it is just a waste of paper.
Arwon

Bazu


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Last post: 6297 days
Last view: 6297 days
Posted on 04-27-06 12:41 AM Link | Quote
The Law of Fives states simply that: ALL THINGS HAPPEN IN FIVES, OR ARE DIVISIBLE BY OR ARE MULTIPLES OF FIVE, OR ARE SOMEHOW DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY APPROPRIATE TO 5.
The Law of Fives is never wrong.


"I find the Law of Fives to be more and more manifest the harder I look." - Lord Omar
drjayphd

Torosu
OW! BURNY!








Since: 11-18-05
From: CT

Last post: 6298 days
Last view: 6296 days
Posted on 04-27-06 03:35 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Skydude
I recall seeing this before, and really, what you have to realize is that there are an infinite number of variables that you can use as numbers, such that you can manipulate them to get them to say something just like that. I also seem to recall reading in an article on that that the flight number they used to "prove" this was wrong anyway, making it even more meaningless.


Putting his post in quote tags for great justice and agreement. Anything can be manipulated to look like a series of coincidences... and why 11? Why not 9/11ths? Does the month not matter any more?
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - World Affairs/Debate - 11? |


ABII

Acmlmboard 1.92.999, 9/17/2006
©2000-2006 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper

Page rendered in 0.022 seconds; used 439.05 kB (max 567.27 kB)