(Link to AcmlmWiki) Offline: thank ||bass
Register | Login
Views: 13,040,846
Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album
05-15-24 07:59 PM
0 users currently in World Affairs/Debate.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - World Affairs/Debate - US to Rest of World: Sorry About Iowa New poll | |
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
drjayphd

Torosu
OW! BURNY!








Since: 11-18-05
From: CT

Last post: 6298 days
Last view: 6296 days
Posted on 02-20-06 02:22 AM Link | Quote
Travis Frey, what is your problem?

This guy drafted a "contract of wifely expectations". Everything from hygiene to... well, "Good Behavior Days". How can you earn them?


Shaving will be done every third day, and includes underarms, legs, and pubic area (navel to anus), all areas are to be completely clean shaven. Every Saturday you are to use the Walh [sic] clippers with a guard no greater than 1/2", and then present yourself to me for a measurement checks [sic].
Above your vaginal slit you can have; 1) A rectangle patch; that must be centered above your vaginal slit, it will have a length no greater than 3/4" [sic] the length of your vaginal slit, no wider than 1 in; 2) Any other shape or design that is centered and above your vaginal slit, with an area of no greater than that of an equilateral triangle with a height of 3/4" [sic] the length of your vaginal slit; or 3) Completely and totally clean shaven. Regardless of which choice of shave, noncompliance is based on a #2 rate.


It gets MUCH worse, but you have to read the contract for yourself. For instance:

Originally posted by NY Daily News
Under the heading of "My Time," Travis Frey stipulated his wife to "be subservient, submissive and totally obedient" and "to do what you are asked, when you are asked, how you are asked" and "perform any and all sexual acts."


That came from a story here. The good news? He's on trial for kidnapping his wife (who never signed the contract) after tying her to a bed, which he mentioned in the contract as punishment for not adhering to his standards. Then, prosecutors added 12 counts of exploitation of a minor after poking around his computer during the investigation. Also in Iowa's favor, the kidnapping charge carries a life sentence without parole.
Clockworkz

Birdon


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6295 days
Last view: 6295 days
Posted on 02-20-06 02:47 AM Link | Quote
"Ohhh, Lawdy, lawdy, lawdy, don't let mazza beat me down! I never gonna look at anotha man, not ever!"

Seriously; I thought slavery was abolished.
Welcome to 2006, buddy. Things don't roll that way anymore.
Xkeeper
Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is.


 





Since: 11-17-05
From: Henderson, Nevada

Last post: 6296 days
Last view: 6296 days
Skype
Posted on 02-20-06 03:01 AM Link | Quote
I hope this little shit rots in jail.

And gets his own 'contract' of the same manner.


(edited by Edit my name and you fry on 02-20-06 02:02 AM)
Ailure

Mr. Shine
I just want peace...








Since: 11-17-05
From: Sweden

Last post: 6296 days
Last view: 6295 days
Posted on 02-20-06 03:04 AM Link | Quote
Funny and horrible in the same way, guess he can have a fun time in prison now. He only seem to think on sex, and being the dominant one.

I just hope people don't grow up to be like theese when they seen too many BDSM movies...


(edited by Catfish on 02-20-06 02:06 AM)
Trapster

King Dedede



 





Since: 11-19-05
From: Sweden

Last post: 6404 days
Last view: 6296 days
Posted on 02-20-06 10:19 AM Link | Quote
I think he forgot that we´re in the 20th century now. Not the early 19th. That guy is a complete control freak. "This will continue every night until you are ready to be compliance, at which time you will need to apologize and explain how you are ready to be my sex slave agin."

Control freak, no shit.

I hope they´ll throw him in the darkest possible cell and "loses" the key.
Cruel Justice
I have better things to do.


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: At my house!

Last post: 6296 days
Last view: 6296 days
Posted on 02-20-06 12:39 PM Link | Quote
Kinda redundant "kidnapping" your own wife. If he's gonna be that low why couldn't he just hire a prostitute to do his little requests? I'd like to see him try to talk big truck driver bubba and biker butch into doing the same thing. That was just bizarre and unusual, I feel a bit nauseated right now.
Rom Manic









Since: 12-18-05
From: Detroit, WHAT?!

Last post: 6295 days
Last view: 6295 days
Posted on 02-20-06 01:04 PM Link | Quote
Interesting. I notice it does not mention Threesomes...Are they not allowed? Do they allow for a GBD if she arranges it by herself? The document seems incomplete and not accomodating to all possible outcomes.

The verdict: Null. Send author to jail for misleading contract negotiations.
Skydude

Armos Knight








Since: 02-18-06
From: Stanford, CA

Last post: 6569 days
Last view: 6569 days
Posted on 02-20-06 04:52 PM Link | Quote
That's...a little scary, really. I don't know if it's fair to blame this on Iowa, though, as much as the nutjob himself.
Rom Manic









Since: 12-18-05
From: Detroit, WHAT?!

Last post: 6295 days
Last view: 6295 days
Posted on 02-20-06 07:41 PM Link | Quote
It's a legally binding contract if she signed it. So long as she doesn't he's not very guilty for making it.

But I do not think this is the real focus of the issue at hand. So this man tried to rape his wife. Thats not Iowa's fault, thats his fault.

But maybe he has a fetish. Saying thats wrong is about as wrong as saying a man that likes lesbian porn more than straight porn is evil and should go to jail for it...Not to say trying to force that on his wife is right, since it is kinda illegal and is considered rape. It's just a psychological angle of it all.
Kutske









Since: 11-19-05

Last post: 6643 days
Last view: 6643 days
Posted on 02-21-06 06:19 AM Link | Quote
While the storm clouds gather far across the sea,
Let us swear allegiance to a land that's free,
Let us all be grateful for a land so fair,
As we raise our voices in a solemn prayer:


God Bless America.
Land that I love
Stand beside her, and guide her
Thru the night with a light from above.
From the mountains, to the prairies ,
To the oceans, white with foam
God bless America
My home sweet home.

God Bless America,
Land that I love
Stand beside her,
And guide her,
Through the night
With the light from above,
From the mountains,
To the prairies,
To the ocean,
White with foam,
God bless America,
My home sweet home.
God bless America,
My home sweet home.


Cruel Justice: Kinda redundant "kidnapping" your own wife.

By this do you mean it's not possible to kidnap one's own wife? Of course it is. Kidnapping is confining someone to a limited area and holding them there against their will. Their relationship to you doesn't change the fact.


Rom Maniac: It's a legally binding contract if she signed it. So long as she doesn't he's not very guilty for making it.

Surely you're not serious. First of all, just writing, "This is a contract that says you (John Doe) must do everything I (Joe Schmoe) tell you to." And then having someone sign it does not make it a legally binding contract. Secondly, under no circumstances can a contract, no matter how well-written or official, stipulate the committing of a crime on or by the author or signer of the contract. Thirdly, on the fourth page the author writes, "This is not a contract; it is a description of rules for you." Directly stating that it's not a contract. This four-page doccument was brought up by the prosecution to show what a whacko Mr. Frey is when his wife charged him with kidnapping.


Rom Maniac: But maybe he has a fetish. Saying thats wrong is about as wrong as saying a man that likes lesbian porn more than straight porn is evil and should go to jail for it...Not to say trying to force that on his wife is right, since it is kinda illegal and is considered rape. It's just a psychological angle of it all.

This isn't a case of "apples and oranges" in the least, and even if he has a fetish for dictating every aspect of his wife's life, that doesn't mean he has a right to try and enact those fantasies. He can fantasize about them, of course, just like someone can fantasize about rape or sex with a child, but the moment something like that is attempted to be realized, it becomes illegal. Really, you sound like you're defending this guy. Although the fact that he wrote the doccument in itself is no reason to arrest him, the fact remains that he kidnapped his wife, and the doccument suggests that he's a very distrurbed and controlling person, which could be grounds for getting their marraige annulled and granting full custody to the mother.
emcee

Red Super Koopa


 





Since: 11-20-05

Last post: 6296 days
Last view: 6295 days
Posted on 02-21-06 06:26 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Whacko

Shaving will be done every third day, and includes underarms, legs, and pubic area (navel to anus), all areas are to be completely clean shaven. Every Saturday you are to use the Walh [sic] clippers with a guard no greater than 1/2", and then present yourself to me for a measurement checks [sic].
Above your vaginal slit you can have; 1) A rectangle patch; that must be centered above your vaginal slit, it will have a length no greater than 3/4" [sic] the length of your vaginal slit, no wider than 1 in; 2) Any other shape or design that is centered and above your vaginal slit, with an area of no greater than that of an equilateral triangle with a height of 3/4" [sic] the length of your vaginal slit; or 3) Completely and totally clean shaven. Regardless of which choice of shave, noncompliance is based on a #2 rate.



I wonder if he used a protractor and a ruler for these measurement checks.


(edited by emcee on 02-21-06 05:27 AM)
Rom Manic









Since: 12-18-05
From: Detroit, WHAT?!

Last post: 6295 days
Last view: 6295 days
Posted on 02-23-06 11:57 AM Link | Quote

Surely you're not serious. First of all, just writing, "This is a contract that says you (John Doe) must do everything I (Joe Schmoe) tell you to." And then having someone sign it does not make it a legally binding contract.

Umm, yeah it does.


Secondly, under no circumstances can a contract, no matter how well-written or official, stipulate the committing of a crime on or by the author or signer of the contract. Thirdly, on the fourth page the author writes, "This is not a contract; it is a description of rules for you." Directly stating that it's not a contract. This four-page doccument was brought up by the prosecution to show what a whacko Mr. Frey is when his wife charged him with kidnapping.

Ok, so I missed that. My mistake. Maybe it doesn't even matter. But point being, in Canada that is a legally binding contract. Perhaps not in America, but that's not my business.


This isn't a case of "apples and oranges" in the least, and even if he has a fetish for dictating every aspect of his wife's life, that doesn't mean he has a right to try and enact those fantasies. He can fantasize about them, of course, just like someone can fantasize about rape or sex with a child, but the moment something like that is attempted to be realized, it becomes illegal. Really, you sound like you're defending this guy. Although the fact that he wrote the doccument in itself is no reason to arrest him, the fact remains that he kidnapped his wife, and the doccument suggests that he's a very distrurbed and controlling person, which could be grounds for getting their marraige annulled and granting full custody to the mother.

Oh, I see what's going on here. The moment I step out of the mob mentality, I'm suddenly defending him. The whole point of that post was to remain neutral. I don't care if he killed someone, I'm not the one who has to judge him. None of you have the right to do that. But be that as it may, I apologize for any confusion I brought up.

The problem with laws is that it guides different people down one single path. Not to incite Anarchy, but for a world that's so different, we base our morals on the wrong kind of perspectives these days. We all have a basic sense of whats right and wrong, some more than others, and nowadays we have to change our morals to keep going in the system. For example, would you date a 14 year old if you're 20? The law says no, and thus our judgement on the subject is forced upon us. Yet the female of 14 is just finished going through that phase where she is now ready to bear a child. Physically and mentally. Unfortunately, society says she will fail because she is too young to bear a child and cannot afford it.

Some cultures around the world would see nothing wrong with this. Yet we do. Are our ancestors just a bunch of wrinkly old geezers with flawed morals? Did they feel that judging another culture and seriously contrasting it to their own was right?

However, thats not to say that all laws are bad, the code of laws can prevent alot of evil, but for some people they just inhibit who they really are.

If anyone takes that as defending a rapist, you need to think more logically about it.


(edited by Rom Manic on 02-23-06 11:05 AM)
(edited by Rom Manic on 02-23-06 11:06 AM)
Ziff
B2BB
BACKTOBASICSBITCHES


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: A room

Last post: 6295 days
Last view: 6295 days
Posted on 02-23-06 01:03 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Rom Manic
Some cultures around the world would see nothing wrong with this.


Read the entire contract.

There's a little bit wrong with it for every single type of culture
Silvershield

580








Since: 11-19-05
From: Emerson, New Jersey

Last post: 6308 days
Last view: 6296 days
Posted on 02-23-06 01:46 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Rom Manic
For example, would you date a 14 year old if you're 20? The law says no, and thus our judgement on the subject is forced upon us. Yet the female of 14 is just finished going through that phase where she is now ready to bear a child. Physically and mentally. Unfortunately, society says she will fail because she is too young to bear a child and cannot afford it.
A modern American (or other Western) female, age 14 years, is not mentally prepared to bear a child. Certainly she is physically capable - she may even be able to at 13 or 12 or even younger - but the emotional and psychological aspect is beyond the capacity of nearly any girl of that age.

And, there is something to be said about disobeying an unjust law. Some laws may direct us to alter an intrinsic moral sense in order to line up more closely with what is right according to society, but there is no dishonor in ignoring such a statute that violates an undeniable moral principle. I don't think American laws are so drastically immoral that they force the average person to significantly alter his own moral compass, though; at least, I can't think of a single example.
Sinfjotle
Lordly? No, not quite.








Since: 11-17-05
From: Kansas

Last post: 6297 days
Last view: 6296 days
Posted on 02-23-06 02:14 PM Link | Quote
Who would sign this? I mean seriously... If they're that stupid to sign it, they kind of deserve it don't you think?

I'm in no way defending the guy, I just think that if someone is stupid enough to sign it, they deserve the stipulations.
Skreename

Giant Red Paratroopa


 





Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6302 days
Last view: 6295 days
Posted on 02-23-06 03:00 PM Link | Quote
The problem isn't what would happen if someone signed it... the problem is that his wife DIDN'T. Therefore, it was still kidnapping/assault.

And... I found that contract disturbing to no end. Just had to say that.
Skydude

Armos Knight








Since: 02-18-06
From: Stanford, CA

Last post: 6569 days
Last view: 6569 days
Posted on 02-23-06 03:57 PM Link | Quote
Even if she had signed it, contracts which are deemed unconscionable can be declared null and void by the courts.
Rom Manic









Since: 12-18-05
From: Detroit, WHAT?!

Last post: 6295 days
Last view: 6295 days
Posted on 02-24-06 05:10 PM Link | Quote
Well they would obviously have to go through court to null it. This would call for more than probable cause to do so...


And, there is something to be said about disobeying an unjust law. Some laws may direct us to alter an intrinsic moral sense in order to line up more closely with what is right according to society, but there is no dishonor in ignoring such a statute that violates an undeniable moral principle. I don't think American laws are so drastically immoral that they force the average person to significantly alter his own moral compass, though; at least, I can't think of a single example.


We don't prepare these 14 year olds because we figure they should be focusing on other things than starting a family. 14 year old girls in Africa are taught from a young age that they will, or should, have a family started.
Trapster

King Dedede



 





Since: 11-19-05
From: Sweden

Last post: 6404 days
Last view: 6296 days
Posted on 02-24-06 05:31 PM Link | Quote
Yes, and their life situation is totally different from ours.

And on the subject of this guy being an ass, too bad there ARE men who abuses their women like this. They should be given the same treatment as their wives (correct me if that was wrong) for a whole year if not more.
mattp

Red Paratroopa


 





Since: 03-04-06

Last post: 6560 days
Last view: 6560 days
Posted on 03-04-06 08:50 PM Link | Quote

I think he forgot that we´re in the 20th century now. Not the early 19th.



Mr, we're in the 21st century now, not the 20th.

By the way a contract is not legally binding unless both parties give something up and gain something.

Also this contract is total bullshit, the guy is a peice of shit and he deserves to get fucking locked up for decades for this.
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - World Affairs/Debate - US to Rest of World: Sorry About Iowa |


ABII

Acmlmboard 1.92.999, 9/17/2006
©2000-2006 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper

Page rendered in 0.024 seconds; used 462.95 kB (max 601.14 kB)