 |
| Register | Login | |||||
 |
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
|
| Register | Login | |||||
|
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
| 0 users currently in General Chat. |
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Chat - Avatars |
New poll |  |  |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
What should all avatars be resized to if they're over this?| Think! | 100x100 |
64.1%, 25 votes | 90x120 |
5.1%, 2 votes | 90x90 |
|
0.0%, 0 vote | 60x120 |
|
0.0%, 0 vote | 60x90 |
2.6%, 1 vote | 60x60 |
25.6%, 10 votes | Other |
2.6%, 1 vote | Multi-voting is disabled. 39 users have voted.
| |
| User | Post | ||
|
Alastor Fearless Moderator Hero                    Since: 11-17-05 From: An apartment by DigiPen, Redmond, Washington Last post: 6297 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
Originally posted by asdfHave you ever even seen it? Changing it on that would screw up the entire look of it. And it looks way better than anything else. |
|||
Kailieann Since: 11-18-05 Last post: 6297 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| 100x100 is standard pretty much everywhere.
CONFORM, DAMMIT. YOU MUST COMPLY. |
|||
Koitenshin +∞ Moblin Since: 12-24-05 From: Misery Last post: 6300 days Last view: 6300 days |
| ||
| I Actually prefer the Night layout with the stars. And I think 100x100 is the generally accepted size for avatars on most boards. | |||
|
Alastor Fearless Moderator Hero Since: 11-17-05 From: An apartment by DigiPen, Redmond, Washington Last post: 6297 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| But 100x100 is unwieldly and unnecessary and pretty stupid... Seriously, there is no reason. NO REASON. That you would need 100x100. (edited by Alastor the Stylish on 01-27-06 11:43 PM) |
|||
asdf Link's Awakening ಠ_ಠ  Since: 11-18-05 Last post: 6299 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| Well, there's no reason to use the RPG scheme either. I checked it out, and it's basically like a more compacted version of the normal scheme with less information. Besides, expanding it might also create space for including total number of posts as well. Unlikely, but...in any case, there is still little point to allowing the RPG scheme to hold us back. | |||
|
Alastor Fearless Moderator Hero Since: 11-17-05 From: An apartment by DigiPen, Redmond, Washington Last post: 6297 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| The table layout is rentsy, and it displays what it needs to. Seriously, if I need to look at the extraneous bonus crap that the normal provides, I can look in someone's profile. Also, who said anything about it holding us back? It's a style thing. 60x60 is more compact than 100x100, and it looks fine unless you're really an idiot who somehow can't manage to make something look good at that size. (edited by Alastor the Stylish on 01-27-06 11:50 PM) |
|||
|
Xkeeper Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is. Since: 11-17-05 From: Henderson, Nevada Last post: 6298 days Last view: 6298 days |
| ||
Originally posted by asdf19:02'56''| secret alternate AIM account: I knida like the memberlist without avatars... 19:02'59''| secret alternate AIM account: looks cleaner. Way ahead of you 
And on that note, I'm nearly done, and unless someone can provide me a very good reason, it's going to be 100x100... |
|||
Sukasa Birdo Not quite as active as before. Xkeeper supporter Xk > ||bass I IP Banned myself! Twice!  Since: 11-17-05 From: Somewhere over there Last post: 6298 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| I can't give you a reason not to use 100x100.
I don't have an avatar that big, but It would be veeeeeeery nice to be able to resize that avatar up to be three times as big as it is right now (32x32), to make it 96x96, which 100x100 supports quite well~ |
|||
|
Xkeeper Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is. Since: 11-17-05 From: Henderson, Nevada Last post: 6298 days Last view: 6298 days |
| ||
| And there it is.
I'll leave this open for a bit in case anyone has any problems or further requests... |
|||
Yoshi Dude TO HELL WITH THIS  Since: 11-17-05 From: Fleepa Last post: 6298 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| jesus christ no
The last thing I want to see is a bunch of loser livejournal icons everywhere. I love the way avatars are now. They're not too small, but they're still unobstructive. this is going to look horrible. >8( for you |
|||
|
Xkeeper Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is. Since: 11-17-05 From: Henderson, Nevada Last post: 6298 days Last view: 6298 days |
| ||
....YD, at least give it a shot  |
|||
|
Yoshi Dude TO HELL WITH THIS Since: 11-17-05 From: Fleepa Last post: 6298 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
Originally posted by XkeeperWell that was my "don't do it argument" since I just got here and didn't get a say =( but okay, we'll see how it goes before I continue my bitchfest. Maybe you guys will make this place beautiful 
maybe adblock will become a second nature Memberlist without avatars.. why follow the steps of a generic message board? I think a poll open for less than three hours determining all of this crap by being a few votes ahead really sucks. (edited by Yoshi Dude on 01-28-06 01:16 AM) |
|||
|
Deleted User Banned    Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 6298 days |
| ||
| So linking to images is out, huh? Crud. | |||
Danielle     6730 Administratorrrr HELLO THERE   Since: 11-17-05 From: California Rate me ^_^ Last post: 6298 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| I completely agree with YD, the 60x60 size was amazing for the sheer fact that people couldn't make huge obscene avatars. You just put the power in their hands. >8(
But oh well. I'm sure if it gets too bad you'll remove them. At least I hope. |
|||
|
Kailieann Since: 11-18-05 Last post: 6297 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| "Huge obscene avatars"? at 100x100?
100x100 is microscopic compared to some forums I've been to, and people can be far more hugely obscene with the layout feature provided here. |
|||
|
Xkeeper Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is. Since: 11-17-05 From: Henderson, Nevada Last post: 6298 days Last view: 6298 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Kailieann One forum I know of has them at some incredible number, like 300x500, so be glad. 100x100 is the standard (Live/Dead)Journal image size, and I guess most people hate those... |
|||
|
Yoshi Dude TO HELL WITH THIS Since: 11-17-05 From: Fleepa Last post: 6298 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| Yeah, obviously larger sizes can exist _¬
LET'S GO FOR 200x200 |
|||
|
Danielle 6730 Administratorrrr HELLO THERE Since: 11-17-05 From: California Rate me ^_^ Last post: 6298 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Kailieann Except layouts are much easier to control because they're MUCH larger. Avatars not so much, they're not something people complain about. I'm used to the 60x60 size, other message boards that allow larger drive me crazy because it allows people to make crap and use it. At least this board is mostly people that are good with pixeling and art in general.... but still. I was happy. |
|||
neotransotaku Sledge Brother Liberated from school...until MLK day  Since: 11-17-05 From: In Hearst Field Annex... Last post: 6300 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| I made my vote with respect to the memberlist. Since avatars are no longer apart of that, then 100 x 100 is alright with me | |||
|
Koitenshin +∞ Moblin Since: 12-24-05 From: Misery Last post: 6300 days Last view: 6300 days |
| ||
| Thanks for giving us more freedom as far as avatars are concerned. Now editpoll just needs to be fixed. (edited by Koitenshin on 01-28-06 02:32 AM) |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Chat - Avatars |
| |
