 |
| Register | Login | |||||
 |
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
|
| Register | Login | |||||
|
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
| 0 users currently in General Chat. |
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Chat - Avatars |
New poll |  |  |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
What should all avatars be resized to if they're over this?| Think! | 100x100 |
64.1%, 25 votes | 90x120 |
5.1%, 2 votes | 90x90 |
|
0.0%, 0 vote | 60x120 |
|
0.0%, 0 vote | 60x90 |
2.6%, 1 vote | 60x60 |
25.6%, 10 votes | Other |
2.6%, 1 vote | Multi-voting is disabled. 39 users have voted.
| |
| User | Post | ||
|
Xkeeper Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is.                   Since: 11-17-05 From: Henderson, Nevada Last post: 6298 days Last view: 6298 days |
| ||
| Any avatar that is not over one of the limits will be left alone (i.e. not resized). Any that is will be resized proportionately until it is under both limits. | |||
Koitenshin +∞ Moblin  Since: 12-24-05 From: Misery Last post: 6300 days Last view: 6300 days |
| ||
| I vote 100x100 because at 60x60 you can barely see it if your image has a lot of detail. | |||
|
Xkeeper Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is. Since: 11-17-05 From: Henderson, Nevada Last post: 6298 days Last view: 6298 days |
| ||
| (hint: replying and saying what you voted for and why makes a bigger difference)
Personally, I think 60x90 or 60x120 (the former preferred) would be good, simply because I've seen a lot of exceedingly great avatars that use the extra vertical space. Not to mention it's only an extra 30 pixels, and a lot of the time there's enough extra space to afford it... |
|||
|
Chaos Force Just drifting by... Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6302 days Last view: 6298 days |
| ||
| I was wondering why avatar were disabled...*votes* | |||
|
Zem Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering. Since: 11-18-05 Last post: 6620 days Last view: 6620 days |
| ||
I'd say 100x100 or 90x120 so I could use my badass Leisure Town avatar.
90x120 sounds more flexible though, so I am choosing that. |
|||
asdf Link's Awakening ಠ_ಠ  Since: 11-18-05 Last post: 6299 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
I knew something was missing from the boards, I just couldn't figure out what. 
Probably 100x100 or 90x120. The space allowed is a lot nicer than some of the other ones. In addition, this poll is somewhat prejudiced against horizontal avatars, such as the one I had. Ideally, there should be a system where bigger avatars are allowed, but it would have to get approved by a staff member first.  (edited by asdf on 01-27-06 10:13 PM) |
|||
|
Zem Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering. Since: 11-18-05 Last post: 6620 days Last view: 6620 days |
| ||
Originally posted by asdf Well, there is more vertical space available than horizontal space, and all of the options here are wider than the old 60 pixels anyway (except the 60x60 itself, of course) |
|||
Emptyeye Oneofthebiggestlegendsand starseverinthis...GOD! Ceremonial Full Moderator Since: 11-17-05 From: I DUNNOOOOOOOO!! Last post: 6297 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| 100*100 is, I think, the standard LJ icon size. Seems to work well enough for that, and that way I could have my icon be William Shatner yelling "KHAAAAAAAAAAN!"
So everyone would win.  |
|||
|
Zem Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering. Since: 11-18-05 Last post: 6620 days Last view: 6620 days |
| ||
| Seriously though, I'm on 800x600 now and the sidebar is already wider than 100 pixels. One of the 90 or 100 wide ones wouldn't even stretch it a bit.
edit durr 800x600 not the other way around (edited by Zem on 01-27-06 10:17 PM) |
|||
neotransotaku Sledge Brother Liberated from school...until MLK day  Since: 11-17-05 From: In Hearst Field Annex... Last post: 6300 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| relative sizes won't work?
forced to selection one of the options, I'd stick with 60x60 |
|||
|
Alastor Fearless Moderator Hero  Since: 11-17-05 From: An apartment by DigiPen, Redmond, Washington Last post: 6297 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| 60x60 is already forced for RPG layout, which I use. I don't want MORE ugly stretching caused by this, and really, there's very little to nothing at all you should be doing with an an avatar that you can't do with 60x60. 60x60, definitely. (edited by Alastor the Stylish on 01-27-06 10:22 PM) |
|||
|
cpubasic13 I'm ahead of myself... Wait...  Since: 11-17-05 From: Citra, Fl. Last post: 6299 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| I think that maybe... 60x120. Since posts are usually long, this won't affect the way the side looks much...
Even if the posts aren't long, the layouts are usually just the size for an avatar of that size to fit. |
|||
|
Zem Permabanned. Flaming, trolling, reregistering. Since: 11-18-05 Last post: 6620 days Last view: 6620 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Alastor the Stylish Perhaps you didn't see this
edit: do your measurements people the sidebar is already wider than 100 pixels and generally approaches/exceeds 300 pixels in height. If you're using the RPG layout then you suck (  )(edited by Zem on 01-27-06 10:24 PM) |
|||
|
Xkeeper Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is. Since: 11-17-05 From: Henderson, Nevada Last post: 6298 days Last view: 6298 days |
| ||
| If you happened to have an avatar under the limit, it'd be left alone... | |||
|
Alastor Fearless Moderator Hero Since: 11-17-05 From: An apartment by DigiPen, Redmond, Washington Last post: 6297 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
Originally posted by ZemLozl what's minor resizing and cropping of an image? |
|||
Hiryuu Sword Maiden Retired Admin  Since: 11-17-05 From: Nerima District - Tokyo, Japan Last post: 6298 days Last view: 6298 days |
| ||
| I tried pressing for something like this a while back in the staff forums and I was trying to get something like 100x100 or 100xany height.
So...100x100 goes for my vote. |
|||
|
Thoughtless [Danielle] Thoughtless is my secret lover [Danielle] *flutters eyelashes* [Thoughtless] SECRET IS OUT I miss my two pussies :( (Part II) Since: 11-17-05 From: PR Last post: 6298 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| 100x100
More detail in pictures. Personally anything would be better than 60x60. Well, anything that is decent I mean. And bigger. |
|||
|
Tatrion <_<; Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6299 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| I think it should stay as 60x60. Like Alastor said, the RPG layout would have to be fixed to accomodate bigger avatars, unless it was exempt from the main avatar rule. Anyway, mine is 60x60, so whatever is really fine with me. If it's not broke...don't fix it. | |||
|
Deleted User Banned    Since: 05-08-06 Last post: None Last view: 6298 days |
| ||
| 11x11 pixels! ! |
|||
|
asdf Link's Awakening ಠ_ಠ Since: 11-18-05 Last post: 6299 days Last view: 6297 days |
| ||
| There's no point in restricting our decision solely because of the RPG layout, though. If anything, the issue should be fixed on that one particular setup.
By the way, check the Memberlist out now that there are no avatars. Looks a LOT nicer and cleaner, right? Xkeeper, if you have the time, you should make an option to view the memberlist without avatars. (edited by asdf on 01-27-06 11:37 PM) (edited by asdf on 01-27-06 11:37 PM) |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Chat - Avatars |
| |
