Register | Login | |||||
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
| |
0 users currently in World Affairs/Debate. |
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - World Affairs/Debate - Overthrown by OIL | New poll | | |
Pages: 1 2 3 | Add to favorites | Next older thread |
User | Post | ||
Rom Manic Since: 12-18-05 From: Detroit, WHAT?! Last post: 6268 days Last view: 6268 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Arwon The point I tried to get across was that Ethanol is not a substitute, just a partner to Oil. You cannot realistically switch to ethanol. If what the advertisements say are true, then one radish can fuel a car when converted to Ethanol. So one radish to every car, lets say there's 100 million on earth running. Now, how long does it take to refuel your vehicle? Maybe once every few days? I do not mean to remove Ethanol as a useful substance. Rather, we should be switching to hybrids that can run on both diesel (With Ethanol being it's closest relative) and gasoline. |
|||
Arwon Bazu Since: 11-18-05 From: Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia Last post: 6270 days Last view: 6269 days |
| ||
Most cars in Brazil can run on anything from 100% gasoline to 100% ethanol and any mixture in between. A lot of newer cars elsewhere in the world run on any mixture as well, simply because it's easier than making separate parts for each fuel type.
I'm not sure the land-area argument holds very well, since as I say something like 0.5% of Brazillian land area is needed to run its entire ethanol industry. This is a country roughly half the size of the US popultion-wise and of a similar total area. Even if America can't get a very efficient ethanol thing going because corn syrup doesn't work very well, there's still places they grow sugar and at a pinch they can import from Brazil instead, surely? You're not going to see coast-to-coast farming purely to fuel cars. |
|||
Rom Manic Since: 12-18-05 From: Detroit, WHAT?! Last post: 6268 days Last view: 6268 days |
| ||
Brazil also has a large and fragile ecosystem to take care of. It's interesting, really, all that rainforest area produces so much oxygen for us to breathe...I would imagine, while that amount is significant, the amount of CO and toxins produced by burning any fuel at all may begin to damage it, if only slightly. But small damage now can be severe in the future.
While we may not see farms coast to coast, making Ethanol use widespread across the globe is not going to be effective enough to be a substitute, which is what alot of people think it will be. But anyways, lets take a scenario: All the worlds oil is gone (We know this by the power of magic), and we need a substitute. There is no oil in the immediate vicinity of the milky way (Also known by magic). We have Ethanol, but now we have to farm our lands to great extents just to survive on fuel-oil cars. Allow me to quote myself from another forum a long time ago (In response to a website that was pro-ethanol). Originally posted by Blade556 So thats out of the picture. The only other alternative we know of is electricity. We could use batteries to power our cars, but now we need more power to meet the electricity requirements of such a feat. So maybe we could park our cars outside during the day and use solar power to charge our batteries, and convert existing gas stations into recharge stations. But who will foot the bill of that effort? The government? But those limits aside, what does a car need to have enough torque to even move the flywheel? Can a simple battery provide enough amperage to make the car move efficiently? |
|||
Ziff B2BB BACKTOBASICSBITCHES Since: 11-18-05 From: A room Last post: 6268 days Last view: 6268 days |
| ||
I don't think a single law maker has claimed that it will be a substitute. Everyone sees it more as an augmentation to fuel supplies. | |||
SamuraiX Broom Hatter Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6269 days Last view: 6270 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Rom Manic Yes. Unless you can prove that batteries cannot produce enough energy and will never be able to, your entire contention about batteries is null and void. I beg you to explain scientifically, why it won't work. Switch grass (pretty sure it's that) can be used for biomass, along with numerous other plants. Efficiency increases with research, to a point, this you completely ignore. When the need comes up, people will be forced to invest in alternative energies. And there's always coal burning for electricity, if nothing else. Which can be improved substantially, in decreasing emissions. |
Pages: 1 2 3 | Add to favorites | Next older thread |
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - World Affairs/Debate - Overthrown by OIL | | |