(Link to AcmlmWiki) Offline: thank ||bass
Register | Login
Views: 13,040,846
Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album
06-02-24 01:18 PM
0 users currently in General Gaming.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Gaming - super mario bros 2 japanese
  
User name:
Password:
Reply:
 
Options: - -
Quik-Attach:
Preview for more options

Max size 1.00 MB, types: png, gif, jpg, txt, zip, rar, tar, gz, 7z, ace, mp3, ogg, mid, ips, bz2, lzh, psd

UserPost
The Red Snifit
Posts: 32/739
I Liked it. I got an artifical FANICOM game with a Download that came with Doki Doki Panic (First SMB2 game) Fun. Like a hard version of original. ( Sorta like th Lost leves from SNES better though)
Chris
Posts: 303/577
Originally posted by CTF
Level design sucked in Lost levels.
It was a little bit, I guess; but some of the levels weren't too bad.
Peardian
Posts: 147/1757
It's pretty funny. The most well known Piranha Plant variety originated in a game many people didn't get.
CTF
Posts: 6/13
Level design sucked in Lost levels.

I missed those great innovations like the poison mushroom and the red plants in the normal Mario with normal difficulty.
Andy
Posts: 344/517
Originally posted by peter_ac
Originally posted by piratepunk
the snes version of smb1 and 2 suck i hate those shitty grahpics and the music sucks





I know LOL. That has to be one of may favourite posts!

Peter_ac is right.
Bloodstar
Posts: 44/669
Originally posted by peter_ac
Originally posted by piratepunk
the snes version of smb1 and 2 suck i hate those shitty grahpics and the music sucks




You win the internet.
Lemon de man
Posts: 28/150
Piratepunk: Who asked you!
Pac
Posts: 48/804
Originally posted by piratepunk
the snes version of smb1 and 2 suck i hate those shitty grahpics and the music sucks


Trapster
Posts: 785/3604
Originally posted by Alastor the Stylish
W...

Traps, duh it was better in the SNES.



I already KNEW that. I just said in a way that´d make piratepunk think about what console would have the best sound.
fabio
Posts: 138/2415
Originally posted by piratepunk
the snes version of smb1 and 2 suck i hate those shitty grahpics and the music sucks


So your saying the top picture has better graphics than the bottom one?




^ Dare to compare.

If I had to choose which had better graphics and music between the NES and the SNES, I'd go with SNES, hands down. Nuff said.

Fun fact: Oh, and if you hate the music, you can always mute it.
Alastor
Posts: 592/8204
W...

What the hell just happened?

Traps, duh it was better in the SNES.

Honestly I can't tell what the hell piratepunk was trying to say.
Andy
Posts: 296/517
Originally posted by piratepunk
the snes version of smb1 and 2 suck i hate those shitty grahpics and the music sucks


That didn't make sense. It's all wrong.
Trapster
Posts: 765/3604
Originally posted by Dark Hero, Jet Black

And BMP is evil. NEVER AGAIN.


No shit. That thing is 167KB.

piratepunk: I believe the sound was better on SNES.
piratepunk
Posts: 8/9
the snes version of smb1 and 2 suck i hate those shitty grahpics and the music sucks
Andy
Posts: 263/517
Yes.

I was asking him if he knew that SMB2J was remade as SMLL for the SNES. I thought it was olbvious I was talking about LL because this is a thread about SMB2J.
Peardian
Posts: 93/1757
Originally posted by Andrew
Oh. But I thought both those things were in the remake.

You mean the Lost Levels?

SMB2J = SMLL
Andy
Posts: 261/517
Oh. But I thought both those things were in the remake.
Peardian
Posts: 91/1757
Physics, for one. Also, there's a Red Piranha Plant and a new looping feature.
Andy
Posts: 256/517
?

Like what? I always thought they were the same except for the graphics.
Alastor
Posts: 449/8204
Eh. Y'know, there ARE some minute differences between the two. And I'm not talking about the graphics.
This is a long thread. Click here to view it.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Gaming - super mario bros 2 japanese


ABII

Acmlmboard 1.92.999, 9/17/2006
©2000-2006 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper

Page rendered in 0.012 seconds; used 358.85 kB (max 421.79 kB)