(Link to AcmlmWiki) Offline: thank ||bass
Register | Login
Views: 13,040,846
Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album
11-01-24 12:14 AM
0 users currently in General Chat.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Chat - Let's create a friend-ring on Digg!
  
User name:
Password:
Reply:
 
Options: - -
Quik-Attach:
Preview for more options

Max size 1.00 MB, types: png, gif, jpg, txt, zip, rar, tar, gz, 7z, ace, mp3, ogg, mid, ips, bz2, lzh, psd

UserPost
windwaker
Posts: 184/235
Originally posted by HyperHacker
Where did you read about this? I saw it linked in an anti-DRM article a few days ago.
Originally posted by windwaker
At least enough of this "AJAX LOLOLOL LOOK NO RELOAD" shit that slows the server down alot by sending useless data in the javascript.

I don't see how you're going to be slowing down a server by sending requests for small XML files rather than an entire page.


View source, man.
Ailure
Posts: 1740/2602
I don't care if slashdot is a bit late with some of their news. I usually go there for the comments and there's something about digg that I don't like. Almost want me to make my own news site though.
HyperHacker
Posts: 3214/5072
Where did you read about this? I saw it linked in an anti-DRM article a few days ago.
Originally posted by windwaker
At least enough of this "AJAX LOLOLOL LOOK NO RELOAD" shit that slows the server down alot by sending useless data in the javascript.

I don't see how you're going to be slowing down a server by sending requests for small XML files rather than an entire page.
Tarale
Posts: 1697/2713
Hmm... I never got into Digg... I've been there a few times, but I dunno... When I got annoyed with Slashdot, I went over to Ars Technica...
windwaker
Posts: 183/235
Oh, most definitely. Unless either site gets a huge redesign (digg's design is getting oooold, even though some of the features are cool, they'd have to redo a lot of the architecture to get it to work great). I think the "digging" idea was cool for a while, but now it's kind of getting old. Perhaps if there was an easier way of viewing all of the stuff put on the site, rather than by ranking. At least enough of this "AJAX LOLOLOL LOOK NO RELOAD" shit that slows the server down alot by sending useless data in the javascript.

Regardless, this is one of the few things I could think of to actually motivate the Digg staff to work on this. Kevin Rose is actually in one of the bigger rings, and he started Digg modeled after /.
Cynthia
Posts: 4353/5814
Yeah but the problem is that as soon as one of those sites ends up getting really popular and starts making money and all that, they always end up having to make concessions.
Xkeeper
Posts: 3496/5653
I have to agree to that.

We need a real version. Something like a good combonation of these sites that netiher censored stories nor relied specifically on users to make it to the front page (or something)...
windwaker
Posts: 181/235
Originally posted by Danielle
Submit what kinds of stories?

I'm not a big writer... as long as I wouldn't have to actually submit work, I'd sign up.


I should clarify. You don't actually write the stories, you simply link to them. It's a really interesting concept.

Xkeeper: by your (and my) logic, Digg isn't as bad as Slashdot yet, because the users still have some power over what goes on the front page. Although the designs of both sites still blow.
Cynthia
Posts: 4349/5814
I've found recently that the /. Games editors don't know news from a hole in their ass. They frequently post "news" that's several days old, for instance.
Xkeeper
Posts: 3495/5653
And this is why /. is still superior to Digg in many ways (even though as of late /. editors have been getting out of hand)
Danielle
Posts: 5743/6737
Submit what kinds of stories?

I'm not a big writer... as long as I wouldn't have to actually submit work, I'd sign up.
windwaker
Posts: 179/235
You're so kind.

Actually this isn't advertising (what would I be advertising ). I just read a few articles and thought "well, let's protest in a fun way", and then that post was born.

I have zero friends on Digg as of yet, so maybe this is just a subconscious plea for acceptance.
Schweiz oder etwas
Posts: 1631/2046
This smells like advertising, but feels like genius deviousness.

I'll allow it.
windwaker
Posts: 176/235
http://jesusphreak.infogami.com/blog/is_digg_rigged

There are currently a few rings on Digg that are made up of a group of people that digg each others' stories, basically patting each others' backs so that their stories always get on the front page. On Digg, how old your account is/how popular your stories are/etc make your influence on stories go higher. This means that users who create large amounts of stories that get to the front page will influence stories more, pushing them to the front page more easily.

I suggest we make an Acmlm friend-ring on Digg. Basically, this means that we create/use existing accounts and add each other as friends on digg. Whenever someone else from our little circle submits a story, we all submit the story, bringing it up to the top. We could become on of the few groups that literally control Digg.

Why do we do this? Two reasons. The first, is simply, for fun. The second; to motivate the programmers behind Digg to work harder to stop these groups. Currently there isn't enough push for them to do that, but Digg is supposed to be of the people, completely democratic; groups like this destroy the ideals behind Digg! If more groups pop up, there will be less central control.

To register:

Go here and create an account. Then read HowStuffWorks' entry on Digg. We will then add everyone to our friends' lists and RULE SUPREME.

My account name is windwaker (a very old account from back when Digg wasn't too big with a few stories on the front page, I have a bit of influence already). Post here with your account name and I'll create a list which we'll all add to our friends list.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Chat - Let's create a friend-ring on Digg!


ABII

Acmlmboard 1.92.999, 9/17/2006
©2000-2006 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper

Page rendered in 0.028 seconds; used 359.23 kB (max 422.61 kB)