Register | Login | |||||
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
| |
0 users currently in General Chat. |
User | Post | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gywall Posts: 137/187 |
CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD 1.2 MOBILITY 0.1 SHELTER 0.3 GOODS/SERVICES 0.2 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 1.8 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 5.3 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.0 PLANETS. Haha.. It's amazing what little money does. XD That's honest, Seriously. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LizardKing Posts: 364/511 |
CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD 1.7 MOBILITY 0.1 SHELTER 0.6 GOODS/SERVICES 0.8 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 3.2 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 7.9 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.8 PLANETS. Wow, that's not so bad, atleast not compared to some of you guys. The result I got was definetaly better than what I had expected. You should be ashamed of yourselves. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Randy53215 Posts: 477/726 |
It said if people lived like me we would need 6.2 earths. >8(
CATEGORY ACRES FOOD 6.2 MOBILITY 2.2 SHELTER 8.9 GOODS/SERVICES 10.1 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
182077607309.34 + Posts: 197/218 |
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.5 PLANETS. I tried getting the lowest footprint I could, and it actually said “IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.0 PLANETS,” but my footprint was four, and some people’s were less, but still was more than one planet. Alastor |
Posts: 7295/8204 I was pretty annoyed at the lack of eat meat but don't have dairy, too.
| I checked, the highest you can go is like 112 acres. NSNick |
Posts: 1525/2228 FOOD 5.9
| MOBILITY 1 SHELTER 6.9 GOODS/SERVICES 7.2 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 21 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.7 PLANETS. Take that, planet! HyperHacker |
Posts: 3211/5072 Well it does take a lot of resources to raise, process, package and ship all that meat.
| We need to just move to Jupiter. That's gotta be more than 18 times Earth's size. Cara Zeltina |
Posts: 58/95 I don't buy this test at all. I rated with 0 Mobility (which is true, since I never leave the house, really..) but somehow, still ended up with a footprint of about 16 or so.. If everyone lived like me it said, we'd need 4.3 (or whatever) planets.. right.. If no one drove and lived in a small town (<1000) like me, I'm really sure that'd require four planets, right, absolutely..
| There is so much bull in this test it is absurd. I hardly do anything to suck up the worlds resources other than the electric I use, which I tend to put to some good use at least, so it isn't wasted.. Seemed the fact I said I eat meat and such made the results skyrocket, which leads me to believe the test is either very biased, or there is some secret animal shortage I don't know about.. Ninetales |
Posts: 565/894 CATEGORY ACRES
| FOOD 5.4 MOBILITY 0.7 SHELTER 2.5 GOODS/SERVICES 3 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 12 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.6 PLANETS. Tatrion |
Posts: 1888/2467 I tried to be the biggest wasteful bastard I could.
| FOOD - 6.9 MOBILITY - 27.9 SHELTER - 4.9 GOODS/SERVICES - 37.3 TOTAL FOOTPRINT - 77 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 17.3 PLANETS. Here's when I took the test seriously - FOOD - 3.7 MOBILITY - 1.7 SHELTER - 6.4 GOODS/SERVICES - 7.4 TOTAL FOOTPRINT - 19 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.3 PLANETS. I'm still a pretty wasful bastard though, despite my attempts to not be My brother though... he turns everything he can ON, and leaves it on when he's not using it SuperLuigi64 |
Posts: 200/281 Opps. What the hell did I put? 2000+ Sq. feet.
| By the way, 200th post!!!!!! Danielle |
Posts: 5738/6737 Originally posted by SuperLuigi64 That's horrible. But lucky for you, the US average is ridiculously high. And god damn, how big is your house? SuperLuigi64 |
Posts: 198/281 CATEGORY ACRES
| FOOD 4.9 MOBILITY 1 SHELTER 9.4 GOODS/SERVICES 7.2 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 22 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON. Is this good or bad? fabio |
Posts: 1747/2415 FOOD 5.9 MOBILITY 0.7 SHELTER 3.7 GOODS/SERVICES 4 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 14 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 3.2 PLANETS. Wow at the food category. Coby |
Posts: 116/123
| CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES FOOD 1.5 MOBILITY 0.6 SHELTER 0.8 GOODS/SERVICES 1.5 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 4.4 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 6.7 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.4 PLANETS. Deleted User |
Posts: 88/-7750 CATEGORY ACRES
| FOOD 4.2 MOBILITY 0.2 SHELTER 3.7 GOODS/SERVICES 2.7 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 11 and the other shit: IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.4 PLANETS. sandrocklq |
Posts: 154/210 CATEGORY ACRES
| FOOD 5.9 MOBILITY 5.9 SHELTER 4.2 GOODS/SERVICES 9.1 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 25 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 5.7 PLANETS. Looks like I'm a resource hog. Dr_Death16 |
Posts: 224/970 CATEGORY ACRES
| FOOD 5.4 MOBILITY 5.4 SHELTER 2.5 GOODS/SERVICES 5.4 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 19 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.2 PLANETS. The only thing I could find that I do that's "bad" would be driving 300 miles a week in a 25 mpg car. Otherwise I walk a lot and don't eat that much. Bargh for Earth Day. blackhole89 |
Posts: 248/427 NARHUNG 1.3
| MOBILITÄT 0.6 HAUS UND HEIM 1 GÜTER UND DIENSTLEISTUNGEN 1.3 GESAMTER FUSSABDRUCK 4.2 Ah, I don't really do much besides going to school and sitting at the computer. THIS IS THE LIFESTYLE FOR AN ECOLOGICALLY CONSCIOUS FUTURE Ailure |
Posts: 1737/2602 CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
| FOOD 1.6 MOBILITY 0.7 SHELTER 0.9 GOODS/SERVICES 1.8 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 5 I don't reallly get the goods/services one though. It probably would been a bit lower if I still actually did live with others and stuff. I wonder what gave a boost to Goods/Servies though since I almost only transport with public transportation. Hmm.. and live in a small apartment. Crap, I managed to vote wrong too. Was supposed to take the top choiche. xDD This is a long thread. Click here to view it. | |