(Link to AcmlmWiki) Offline: thank ||bass
Register | Login
Views: 13,040,846
Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album
06-01-24 07:28 AM
0 users currently in General Chat.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Chat - You have GOT to be kidding me...
  
User name:
Password:
Reply:
 
Options: - -
Quik-Attach:
Preview for more options

Max size 1.00 MB, types: png, gif, jpg, txt, zip, rar, tar, gz, 7z, ace, mp3, ogg, mid, ips, bz2, lzh, psd

UserPost
HyperHacker
Posts: 2940/5072
Originally posted by ||bass
Originally posted by HyperHacker
I don't see why this is stupid... he owes them money that he doesn't have and damn well isn't likely to ever get. They suspect there's gold on his property. Since he can't pay them, they go for his gold instead. Makes sense to me.

Now if they're accusing him of hiding this gold, then that's fairly dumb...
Clearly you DIDN'T READ the article. They ARE accusing him of hiding the gold. If you actually read the article, it says AOL is digging for gold on the guy's PARENT'S PROPERTY. Parents that he has apperantly not seen in quite some time.

Keh, that'll teach me to skim. It still makes some sense though, if they have reason to suspect it's there.
Ziff
Posts: 1137/1800
I'm going to mine ||bass' nose until I find green gold! Why? Because he may or may not be hiding it in there.

(I suspect he eats it)
||bass
Posts: 382/594
All I have to say is. If they dig and there turns out to be no gold, this is going to be a HUGE egg in the face for AOL. Even though this guy is a spammer and a fugitive. Huge huge PR mistake.
sandrocklq
Posts: 83/210
AOl needs to come up with better eveidence then "he owes us money and you're his parents," before they can dig up their lawn. This will get shot down in court for sure.
NSNick
Posts: 1476/2228
I regularly go to strangers' houses and dig for various hidden valuable metals.
KeiiChi Kun
Posts: 168/190
Originally posted by Glyph Phoenix
How dare you guys. This is a fantastic story. I know if I were running an internet company and somebody stole from me, I'd totally go to their parents' house and dig for gold.

Wouldn't YOU?


Well, it is a rather ... "non-conventional" idea, but I guess if the thought crossed my mind I'd just HAVE to do it.
Glyphodon
Posts: 337/536
How dare you guys. This is a fantastic story. I know if I were running an internet company and somebody stole from me, I'd totally go to their parents' house and dig for gold.

Wouldn't YOU?
Vangar
Posts: 17/25
Originally posted by emcee
If they can come up with reasonable evidence that there's gold there, I say go for it. I mean, I would assume even if they do get court approval to dig, they'll use ground penetrating radar to locate it first, it's not like they'd just tear up the whole yard.


They must have some pretty strong evidence to decide to go and dig there. I mean if they weren't sure, surely they wouldn't be stupid enough to go and dig randomly.
emcee
Posts: 494/867
If they can come up with reasonable evidence that there's gold there, I say go for it. I mean, I would assume even if they do get court approval to dig, they'll use ground penetrating radar to locate it first, it's not like they'd just tear up the whole yard.
Ziff
Posts: 1132/1800
It'd be awesome if he just bought "platinum bundles" of viagra. Like tonnes and tonnes of viagra and pornography and stashed them in his parents yard until he was 50. Or really looking to party.
||bass
Posts: 378/594
Originally posted by HyperHacker
I don't see why this is stupid... he owes them money that he doesn't have and damn well isn't likely to ever get. They suspect there's gold on his property. Since he can't pay them, they go for his gold instead. Makes sense to me.

Now if they're accusing him of hiding this gold, then that's fairly dumb...
Clearly you DIDN'T READ the article. They ARE accusing him of hiding the gold. If you actually read the article, it says AOL is digging for gold on the guy's PARENT'S PROPERTY. Parents that he has apperantly not seen in quite some time.
HyperHacker
Posts: 2912/5072
I don't see why this is stupid... he owes them money that he doesn't have and damn well isn't likely to ever get. They suspect there's gold on his property. Since he can't pay them, they go for his gold instead. Makes sense to me.

Now if they're accusing him of hiding this gold, then that's fairly dumb...
Xeo Belmont
Posts: 345/1016
They won't find Lucky Charms. That's for sure.
Arwon
Posts: 358/631
Yarrrr, that's awesome. Why the outrage. THEY'RE DIGGING FOR GOLD, PEOPLE.
Randy53215
Posts: 421/726
I wish AOL would just die already. Seeing their shitty programs make my eyes hurt.

And what the hell is AOL thinking for digging? Pretty soon AOL is going to turn into the next diggers hotline, and if its as bad as their internet service..... Prepare to die if they hit a gas line.
||bass
Posts: 374/594
Originally posted by witeasprinwow
Originally posted by Coby
Shouldn't there be a law stating that a company cannot just put anything they want into their policies? i.e. something bad for the customer
Because in Belgium there is.
There are laws like this in America, but they don't apply to disclosure of privacy for legal reasons.
That's because there is no constitutional right to privacy no matter how many people seem to think otherwise.
witeasprinwow
Posts: 452/613
Originally posted by KeiiChi Kun
What the fuck. The American legal system really has taken a turn for the worst. Anyway, what kind of retarded ISP decides that instead of having some guy pay them back money all of his life, they'd rather dig up his parents garden for gold? It sounds kind of crazy.


Please read and understand the source material before you go insulting governments, kthx

It doesn't say they were granted permission by the legal system to dig for gold, it says they are asking the legal system for permission. It hasn't been granted yet. You can appeal to the government for whatever the hell you want, but that doesn't mean it will go through.

Originally posted by Coby
Shouldn't there be a law stating that a company cannot just put anything they want into their policies? i.e. something bad for the customer
Because in Belgium there is.


There are laws like this in America, but they don't apply to disclosure of privacy for legal reasons.
Xkeeper
Posts: 3208/5653
Originally posted by KeiiChi Kun
What the fuck. The American legal system really has taken a turn for the worst. Anyway, what kind of retarded ISP decides that instead of having some guy pay them back money all of his life, they'd rather dig up his parents garden for gold? It sounds kind of crazy.

if you had read the fucking article, you'd know that they arleady have.

he's gone into hiding.
Coby
Posts: 112/123
Shouldn't there be a law stating that a company cannot just put anything they want into their policies? i.e. something bad for the customer
Because in Belgium there is.
Skreename
Posts: 1034/1427
Aside from the fact that there's no worthwhile evidence that it'd be at their house, it actually kinda makes sense. The guy made tons of money doing something that he then lost a lawsuit over, so the company is... acquiring the assets gained from it. Nevermind that they're doing it with shovels.

And Xkeeper Alexa's little quote IS rather scary... But I suppose it's fair enough warning not to tell people private things over any medium besides the air directly between you.
This is a long thread. Click here to view it.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Chat - You have GOT to be kidding me...


ABII

Acmlmboard 1.92.999, 9/17/2006
©2000-2006 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper

Page rendered in 0.020 seconds; used 365.85 kB (max 435.66 kB)