(Link to AcmlmWiki) Offline: thank ||bass
Register | Login
Views: 13,040,846
 Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album 		06-01-24 08:06 PM
0 users currently in General Chat.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Chat - Oh dear; what did XK do now?
  
User name:
Password:
Reply:
 
Options: - -
Quik-Attach:
Preview for more options
Max size 1.00 MB, types: png, gif, jpg, txt, zip, rar, tar, gz, 7z, ace, mp3, ogg, mid, ips, bz2, lzh, psd

UserPost
Jilkon
Posts: 133/227
Originally posted by asdf
Originally posted by Alastor the Stylish
Eh. A filter on XD would be better.


XD is fine the way it is. A filter would just mess up its awesomeness.

But it's supposed to be xD.
Also, anyone can see that 24h time is more logical, more handy, and has 13:37 (which makes it better). The thing that really takes the cake with am/pm is that 12am is followed by 1am. Since 12 is bigger one would like it to come later, like after 11am.
Ogre
Posts: 29/65		 And think about it realistically Xk, the true larms use crap like lawl, lolz, lolooll and other such annoying bullshit. There is no stopping them without whipping out the Ban Hammer to make some examples of people, getting the community to help you weed out stupidity.
Xkeeper
Posts: 2582/5653
Originally posted by Cara Zeltina
And lol isn't annoying and pointless to begin with? I mean.. No one cares if you're laughing out loud.. And it is sorely abused anyway, as people start using it as a filler between their lame jokes and comments - hence they aren't actually laughing at all, just mildly amused at themselves.

Where did you come from?

Seriously, I thought we only got rejects from Planet N00B. D:

(Okay, really... uh, I should probably go turn that filter off now, I think I've made my point.

Or maybe I should filter " lol " (spaces included) to "I AM AN IDIOT". Hmm...)
PrincessPeach
Posts: 214/381
Originally posted by Xkeeper
What about lolipops?

They're called SUCKERS >8(


lolipops. Lutschers, BlAH! Whatever.

Jedä schurrt so wie ihm de schnabel gwachse isch.
Xkeeper
Posts: 2576/5653		 What about lolipops?

They're called SUCKERS >8(
craig3410
Posts: 66/119
Originally posted by HyperMackerel
But what if I want a lollipop?


Speaking of which, there's a post in ROM Hacking about hacking "Adventures of Lolo."

You can probably figure out what the filter did to it.
Thoughtless
Posts: 1989/2405
Originally posted by Xkeeper
Originally posted by Thoughtless
That is why I use this -> XD to signify actual laughing.

And I don't try to overdo it.

"hahahahaha" (optinal number of "ha"s) works much better



Well, I sometimes use that. I usually go for 'haha' instead of the long laughter of 'hahahahahahahahahahahhaha'

Which looks like a crazy laugh Kyouji would make.
Alastor
Posts: 6429/8204
Originally posted by asdf
They're two different things. XD is used for when you find something humorous. DX< looks like a dead person, or someone who is frustrated.
Exactly
Xkeeper
Posts: 2568/5653
Originally posted by Thoughtless
That is why I use this -> XD to signify actual laughing.

And I don't try to overdo it.

"hahahahaha" (optinal number of "ha"s) works much better
Thoughtless
Posts: 1987/2405		 That is why I use this -> XD to signify actual laughing.

And I don't try to overdo it.
Xkeeper
Posts: 2567/5653
Originally posted by asdf
Umm...the post Cara Zeltina made didn't relate to the point at all. I was talking about words that have lol inside them, she went off on a rant about how using lol is pointless and that you should use smilies instead.

Think of it this way. The word cum is filtered to manjuice. Now, that's going to cause collateral damage, as words like cumulus, cucumber, circumstances and cumbersome are going to get messed up. Of course, that's just an example and would never actually happen, but the point remains. Filtering words that can show up in other words is going to cause problems.

cumanjuiceber actually sounds rather amusing
Kattwah
Posts: 2488/3349		 This is why I use lawl...



Its not laughing out loud, but yet its still laughing...

PS, nice word filter Xk
asdf
Posts: 2738/4077		 Umm...the post Cara Zeltina made didn't relate to the point at all. I was talking about words that have lol inside them, she went off on a rant about how using lol is pointless and that you should use smilies instead.

Think of it this way. The word cum is filtered to manjuice. Now, that's going to cause collateral damage, as words like cumulus, cucumber, circumstances and cumbersome are going to get messed up. Of course, that's just an example and would never actually happen, but the point remains. Filtering words that can show up in other words is going to cause problems.
Alastor
Posts: 6425/8204		 Augh. Cara Zeltina, you hit the nail on the head there. Why didn't I vote you for best newbie?
Cara Zeltina
Posts: 40/95
Originally posted by asdf
Originally posted by HyperMackerel
But what if I want a lollipop?


Or what if you want to talk about sotalol or atenolol? Maybe you want to tell someone to stop lollygagging around? Sure, it's easy to bypass with <b> </b> or <z>, but it's still incredibly annoying and pointless.

And lol isn't annoying and pointless to begin with? I mean.. No one cares if you're laughing out loud.. And it is sorely abused anyway, as people start using it as a filler between their lame jokes and comments - hence they aren't actually laughing at all, just mildly amused at themselves.

So yea, it is pointless in and of itself. If you really absolutely need to get your joke across somehow (to inform people you aren't serious) then use smilies. Not that I really like those too much either, but they at least serve a purpose in translating the tone of a user..
asdf
Posts: 2731/4077
Originally posted by HyperMackerel
But what if I want a lollipop?


Or what if you want to talk about sotalol or atenolol? Maybe you want to tell someone to stop lollygagging around? Sure, it's easy to bypass with <b> </b> or <z>, but it's still incredibly annoying and pointless.
Cynthia
Posts: 3585/5814		 I don't get the reverse smilies like D: and the like.

Simple is better.
HyperHacker
Posts: 2590/5072		 But what if I want a lollipop?
asdf
Posts: 2727/4077
Originally posted by Alastor the Stylish
Originally posted by asdf
Originally posted by Alastor the Stylish
Eh. A filter on XD would be better.


XD is fine the way it is. A filter would just mess up its awesomeness.
I disagree. It should be filtered to DX<.

They're two different things. XD is used for when you find something humorous. DX< looks like a dead person, or someone who is frustrated.
Deleted User
Posts: 121/-7750
Originally posted by Alastor the Stylish
Originally posted by asdf
Originally posted by Alastor the Stylish
Eh. A filter on XD would be better.
XD is fine the way it is. A filter would just mess up its awesomeness.
I disagree. It should be filtered to DX<.

Why not just make it >X(? Or better yet, >XP?
This is a long thread. Click here to view it.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Chat - Oh dear; what did XK do now?


ABII

Acmlmboard 1.92.999, 9/17/2006
©2000-2006 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper

Page rendered in 0.013 seconds; used 366.70 kB (max 434.33 kB)