Register | Login | |||||
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
| |
0 users currently in Craziness Domain. |
User | Post |
Pikawil Posts: 66/135 |
I'm going to be a lazy bystander because I could care less about world domination/saving. |
Andy Posts: 251/517 |
I'm a good person. A very gooood person! |
Anya Posts: 73/1176 |
You forgot Neutral. Don't worry, many do. |
Sin Dogan Posts: 18/861 |
Well considering that some of my more achievable dreams are curing diseases and ending conflict in certain parts of the world, I would consider myself "good". |
Valcion Posts: 38/585 |
Chaotic Good or Chatotic Neutral. |
Thexare Posts: 65/1104 |
Like Hiryuu, I was thinking Chaotic Good, and like Hiryuu, I got Neutral Good. Although it's worth pointing out that I was only 2% away from Neutral, and 1% away from Chaotic. |
Hiryuu Posts: 162/2480 |
I'm showing Neutral-Good by said test.
Sounding right. I was thinking Chaotic-Good before I took. Pretty close. |
Emptyeye Posts: 68/869 |
I took a D&D alignment test, and scored about as close to True Neutral as you can get. |
Silvershield Posts: 1/587 |
Originally posted by Cruel Justice As long as you're making a D&D reference, it's rather important to keep in mind that evil and good don't equate to mean and nice. I'd not hesitate to contend that the majority, if not the entirety, of this board's population could be labeled some form of good (or, in some situations, maybe lawful neutral). I find chaotic and true neutral to be somewhat unrealistic and have met few people who would faithfully adhere to the tenets of either. For that matter, an accurately evil alignment more or less requires wanton destruction or, if nothing else, total disregard for one's fellow human; it's not commonly seen among well-adjusted members of real world societies, I would argue. It makes me think of an argument I read on a message board once concerning the alignment of a character in Baldur's Gate II. The character, who enforced a totalitarian regime on a city and oversaw all of its defenses as well as any civil policies, lived comfortably while his subjects starved. Though not detailed all that thoroughly within the scope of the plot, the character was hinted at having deeper motivations that those that were immediately evident. In the discussion on the message board, while some posters argued that he was undoubtedly evil because of his oppressive rule, others made the point that his deeper motivations were unknown and it was impossible to conclude what his alignment was; as one person said, "lawful good does not mean lawful nice." In the end, I would've called the character lawful neutral, as he paid little heed to the concerns of good or evil in seeking a method of rule that would have ultimately the greatest benefit. |
Deleted User Posts: 52/-7750 |
I'm evil myself. I'm good to people and to the Almighty, but my heart is hard to purify by standard means. I guess that makes me a natural dark force. |
Trapster Posts: 277/3604 |
That was quite a nifty answer.
I guess I´ve to vote for good since it´s the closest to Chaotic Good. |
Danielle Posts: 129/6737 |
I'm not only good, I am great.
Yeah, take that. |
182077607309.34 + Posts: 13/218 |
It depends… if I have a choice in a game then I'll be evil, other wise I'm good or a bystander. |
Ylle Posts: 26/58 |
Chaotic Neutral in D&D.
Whiny Bystander in this poll. There's no other way for me, really. |
Aurxix Posts: 150/252 |
Originally posted by Pikawil By-Stander....:s |
Salmon Posts: 20/221 |
From D&D, PHB v 3.5:
Alignment: [...] clerics can be of any alignment. [...] there are more good than evil clerics. Clerics also tend toward law instead of chaos |
Roy Posts: 1/23 |
a little bit good, a little bit evil and a little bit neutral... |
Deleted User Posts: 45/-7750 |
It's the freaking blue one! |
Pikawil Posts: 44/135 |
Hey, where's the freaking Neutral choice? |
Thexare Posts: 54/1104 |
I think a cleric can be evil if his deity is also evil, Colin, but I might have that wrong.
Edit: Grammar Nazism. |
This is a long thread. Click here to view it. |