(Link to AcmlmWiki) Offline: thank ||bass
Register | Login
Views: 13,040,846
Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album
06-01-24 06:44 AM
0 users currently in Programming.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - Programming - C++ Compilers
  
User name:
Password:
Reply:
 
Options: - -
Quik-Attach:
Preview for more options

Max size 1.00 MB, types: png, gif, jpg, txt, zip, rar, tar, gz, 7z, ace, mp3, ogg, mid, ips, bz2, lzh, psd

UserPost
firemaker
Posts: 151/194
Hell no! My dad bought it. He's always programming some windows program or other (though now he seems to be quite the linux guru.)
HyperHacker
Posts: 1660/5072
Well that IS what you're supposed to do. I hope you don't mean to imply you pirated it?
Black Lord +
Posts: 95/273
Originally posted by firemaker
I've got Microsoft dev C++ pro. It's pretty good, just a bit expensive.



You're trying to tell me, you payed for Microsoft's compiler...

That seems, well, umm rediculous...
firemaker
Posts: 147/194
I've got Microsoft dev C++ pro. It's pretty good, just a bit expensive.
neotransotaku
Posts: 1042/1860
What context of Code::Blocks are you coming from because I'm pretty sure everyone else in this thread besides you doesn't know what file has Code::Blocks in it...
CluelessOne
Posts: 21/32
Hmm...okay, I found something interesting.

Think someone can look into Code::Blocks?
Eponick
Posts: 68/85
*Shrugs*
Never given me any trouble in the last 3 years.
HyperHacker
Posts: 1607/5072
Generally when I get code that was written for MSVC6, not even MSVC6 is able to compile it. For that matter, it struggles with code that works fine in other compilers.
Black Lord +
Posts: 92/273
From what I've heard, MSVC 6 is one of the worst compilers out there.

If I was on Windows, I'd probably use Borland, but I'm not on Windows, so therefore, I don't have to. gcc for the win.
Eponick
Posts: 67/85
Personally I use MSVC 6.
Its a pretty good compiler and a great IDE.
Deleted User
Posts: 63/-7750
I use Dev c++ in a 450 mhz computer, and works fine for me. Or Try with C Builder.
Parasyte +
Posts: 53/53
MinGW is the only GCC suite for Windows. Likewise, MSys is the only UNIX-like environment for Windows. Get with the program.
Eponick
Posts: 65/85
You can still use it, the command prompt works just fine.
CluelessOne
Posts: 20/32
DJGPP? That's...DOS! I'm on XP here, where there is no true DOS.
Eponick
Posts: 64/85
Cant fail with DJGPP.
Just go to the Zip Picker and select what all you want/need.

Its GCC/G++ for windows
neotransotaku
Posts: 1033/1860
You can get mingw, which is what the Windows Version of gcc is based on.

or, if you want to use a UNIX environment on windows, use Cygwin, then you can use gcc.
CluelessOne
Posts: 19/32
Coming from a Java background, I'd like to learn a bit of C++ now. However, I'm stuck on...well, Windows. That also means my choice of compilers is kind of limited.


There is VC2005 available, but that's Microsoft, and I couldn't even get a basic console application to work on that. And don't mention MFC...I shouldn't need it.

There is Dev-C++ available, but that uses up WAY too much memory before you even open a project. VC2005 used less RAM even with a project open.

There is GCC available, but that's for Linux.


Any ideas as to what I should get, and why?
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - Programming - C++ Compilers


ABII

Acmlmboard 1.92.999, 9/17/2006
©2000-2006 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper

Page rendered in 0.013 seconds; used 356.81 kB (max 406.30 kB)