 |
| Register | Login | |||||
 |
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
|
| Register | Login | |||||
|
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
| 0 users currently in General Chat. |
| User | Post |
| Zem Posts: 6/1097 |
Originally posted by Lilmario I would prefer an admin without such a tendency for melodrama (not to mention grudges), frankly. Xkeeper is capable, and I guess an active board "owner" is a good thing, but I'm dreading an interminable series of annoying behaviors on his part. On an unrelated note, what I've seen of Yoronosuku really gets on my nerves. Maybe it's an unrepresentative sample. |
| HyperHacker Posts: 1/5072 |
Indeed he is. Part of me still wishes he would just leave already, but another part wants to hug him for finally banning Knuck. 
Honestly, I was going to consider not even registering (except for maybe a 'told you so' post  ) until AB 2.0 was ready and Acmlm came back and fixed things up the way they should be. But then I realized I couldn't live without the ROM Hacking forums. I mean it's one thing when the board is gone, there's no forum to post in, but when people are actively using them, that's another thing entirely. |
| Kattwah Posts: 41/3349 |
Originally posted by Lilmario  You are not worthy.
Xk is a mixed bag really... you hate him, but you have to love him for working on the board  |
| neotransotaku Posts: 21/1860 |
Originally posted by Lilmario I'm sure many of us would have preferred a different course of action than what Xk did in redoing the board...but hey, it's Xk--i wouldn't expect anything less from him  |
| Cynthia Posts: 55/5814 |
At least the board's being developed again.
What would you rather prefer; active development or seeing it slow to a halt? |
| Lilmario Posts: 7/181 |
Geez, you'd think people would realize that NOONE can do better than what Xk has done  |
| Doppelganger Posts: 71/300 |
Originally posted by ThoughtlessOriginally posted by Lilmario Nothing worse than Xkeeper did, right? |
| Cruel Justice Posts: 40/1637 |
Keep the spammers, ban the staff... spam alot... good day err... good night acmlm's! |
| Thoughtless Posts: 17/2405 |
Originally posted by Lilmario I don't. I seriously do not want to imagine what you could've done with those powers. |
| Lilmario Posts: 2/181 |
rofl
That was Xk. I wish i had of been here to use it though  |
| Cynthia Posts: 21/5814 |
And then the world explodes. :\
But seriously... Help/Suggestions. Put ALLLLLL the bugs there. |
| Doppelganger Posts: 13/300 |
Originally posted by Xeogred If Lilmario = ||Bass Then Acmlm = Xkeeper ... OH WAIT |
| Xeo Belmont Posts: 9/1016 |
wonder if it's ||bass
lalwls |
| Xkeeper Posts: 9/5653 |
Lilmario as admin:
18:04'04"> Xkeeper: every account you register while logged in 18:04'06"> Xkeeper: keeps the powerlevel you have My tlayout not working: fixed now |
| Doppelganger Posts: 4/300 |
Appearantly I can't edit the thread title in my edit post field. Bah humbug. Someone get the almighty admins to change the thread title to board bugs. Also, the Xkeeper layout is broken. |
| Kattwah Posts: 17/3349 |
Well, if I HAD my moderating powers, that would be a possibility Neo...
However, I dont HAVE them yet (Mod of nothing right now)... Thats just a bug within itself |
| neotransotaku Posts: 4/1860 |
i believe we need a bug thread now... otherwise, other threads like this will pop up...
why not make this one into a bug thread  |
| Doppelganger Posts: 2/300 |
http://board.acmlm.org/profile.php?id=45
Discuss. |
