Register | Login | |||||
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
| |
0 users currently in Craziness Domain. |
User | Post |
NSNick Posts: 469/2228 |
Any hints on that crazy "bible myth" one? |
||bass Posts: 127/594 |
I also don't like question #37.
#37 took me FOREVER.... you know why? Because the answer it expects is _WRONG_. The kind of ignorance displayed in question 37 is a slap in the face to all Americans. If you don't know have a clue about American geography, don't go pretending to be the quizmaster about the topic. |
asdf Posts: 499/4077 |
Originally posted by ||bass Yes, such as 49. That particular question is almost as easy as the second one. |
||bass Posts: 124/594 |
Originally posted by ColinWell. While I'm not sure why DV would have a problem. I can see why SOME people would have serious issues with #9. For example, anyone who doesn't speak english as a first language would have serious difficulty with 9. |
Cynthia Posts: 1291/5814 |
It makes sense though. And to be honest, some questions that I can figure out in a minute might take someone hours or days.
(See: Question 9, Dark Vampriel.) |
||bass Posts: 119/594 |
Has anyone else noticed that the order of the questions has absoloutly zero relation to the difficulty?
It seems like there are high questions that are stupidly easy and very low questions that are insanely difficult. |
asdf Posts: 497/4077 |
64 was brutal for me, seeing as how my knowledge in music, moreso audial clues, is somewhat limited. On Level 65 right now...which doesn't look much easier.
EDIT: I stand corrected. Level 66. EDIT 2: Level 67! |
Cynthia Posts: 1283/5814 |
OK, apology accepted.
This thread can get back on track to solving the problems now I suppose. Sorry for the little blip. |
||bass Posts: 118/594 |
Yea, I do apologise about the AIM thing. I know you aren't going to belive this but I really honestly meant to send that to NSNick (we were trying to figure out if you were trying to say nm was or wasnt nanometers) and your names are directly adjacent to each other on my buddy list (acmlm staffers category alphabetical order "NSNick" vs "NilocN2k".)
I really didn't mean to taunt you. Honestly, sorry. |
Cynthia Posts: 1281/5814 |
If what you're looking for is an apology, then I will apologize because you did get me, and I'm willing to admit my mistake by not knowing that wavelength is measured in nanometres.
In the future, however, I'd very much appreciate it if you didn't decide to taunt me over AIM about stuff like this by calling me an "idiot". Thank you. |
||bass Posts: 117/594 |
Originally posted by Colin Originally posted by ColinCongradulations on proving YOURSELF wrong. This has got to be a first. Like nsnick said... "Umm what?" |
Cynthia Posts: 1275/5814 |
This is a spoiler for the problem in question, but just to prove that there is a link and to put this behind us... Voila! |
||bass Posts: 116/594 |
Originally posted by NSNickYea, I was trying to point out that contradiction myself. You did a better job though.Originally posted by Colin In other news: |
NSNick Posts: 459/2228 |
Originally posted by Colin Um, what? nm does mean nanometers, and 511 nm is a way of describing the answer, yes. |
||bass Posts: 115/594 |
Originally posted by ColinYes it does because 511 nanometers IS the way "511 nm" can represent the answer. Saying that "511 nm is another way of saying the answer to the question" only makes sence to begin with if nm stands for nanometers. Duh. |
Cynthia Posts: 1270/5814 |
And despite what some geniuses here would like to tell you, nm DOES mean nanometers.
1) It doesn't, because 511 nm is another way of saying the answer to the question. 2) Don't patronize me. Grey: Bet you $10 he cheated. |
Teddylot Posts: 132/286 |
Fine, I'll be out with it ... look out for my username under Max's. |
Koneko Posts: 208/656 |
Phew. Finally won... Started about when I noticed this thread, seven hours ago.
Great fun, eh? *sleep sleep sleep* |
asdf Posts: 471/4077 |
Just got to number 60. |
NSNick Posts: 449/2228 |
...I'm on 52. |
This is a long thread. Click here to view it. |