(Link to AcmlmWiki) Offline: thank ||bass
Register | Login
Views: 13,040,846
Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album
06-01-24 10:58 PM
0 users currently in Modern Art.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - Modern Art - Layout, gbargle.
  
User name:
Password:
Reply:
 
Options: - -
Quik-Attach:
Preview for more options

Max size 1.00 MB, types: png, gif, jpg, txt, zip, rar, tar, gz, 7z, ace, mp3, ogg, mid, ips, bz2, lzh, psd

UserPost
Zem
Posts: 524/1097
I think the issue, however complicated, can be easily resolved if Block Layout is put back in.

I'll be honest. I don't like your layout. But I wouldn't care if I could turn it off without turning off all the other layouts.

So, if Block Layout is implemented soon it won't bother me, and I won't bother anyone about their layout.
Tommathy
Posts: 83/339
Kyofu's layout is just as explicit, you're staring right down into her bubbly cleavage.
Ran-Chan's girl is in a tight teddy that clearly outlines her B-cups.
Rydain's, you think Felicia is tame?
Anya's girl's top is basically like a second skin without nipples, *and* they catch the light and shine at you.
Ditto for ||Bass's girl, although I don't know if that's a shirt or her chest

Anyone remember this? It was someone's avatar in one of the previous board incarnations. Unless you set globally not to show avatars/user titles, you see everyone's avatar and user title even when layout blocking.

More subtle, and really, this one is a stretch, but someone has the playboy symbol and is named "UZI in my pocket". Do we really need to know his shooting habits?
Apophis
Posts: 250/734
Come on though... if VN couldn't have his avatar...
Clockworkz
Posts: 251/984
You know what? This is getting stupid. I'm tired of seeing people rant about this. I'm going to be upfront and frank about this, and I don't care you get angry at me or not, because it's not meant to be offensive to Tommathy. I'm just getting tired of it.

This is how it is: Ok. You're gay. We get it. We're not making a big deal out of it. I accept you, and I say "good for you". We don't care if you are or not, we do not judge sexual orientation, and we don't care. But you're making us care by forcing Man Bulges in our faces. It's like... We acknowledge you're gay. We acknowledge you're proud. That's all fine and dandy, but there's a limit. It almost sems like, you don't want to accept the fact that we acknowledge thiat you're gay and just keep rubbing it in our faces with constant layouts of big mean wearing as little, tight clothing as they can. This is ridiculous. I hope you rethink this, and get off this big fad of your, because, quite framkly, I'm sick of it. If the Block Layout feature was instantiated (XKEEPER ), I wou;dn't be writing this, because one click, and poof; it's gone. But no; I gotta look at it. And that's not right or fair.

Someone HAD to say it.
Danielle
Posts: 1659/6737
Oh come on you guys, act your age.
Keep it up and this will be closed.
Tommathy
Posts: 82/339
Originally posted by Apofisu
Man... what is it with you and man-bulges?



Just 'cause you don't bulge doesn't mean other, you know, men don't.
Alastor
Posts: 2291/8204
Originally posted by Apofisu
Man... what is it with you and man-bulges?
It's not unhealthy, considering his sexual orientation, though. Sure it's not something many want to look at it but it's far from amazingly offensive. Not like that LAST one.
Clockworkz
Posts: 249/984
I CAN STILL SEE HIS PENIS
T_T
Apophis
Posts: 245/734
Man... what is it with you and man-bulges?
Tommathy
Posts: 79/339
Okay, I'm pretty sure there aren't any pseudo-penes in this one...
Schweiz oder etwas
Posts: 446/2046
Uh.... No showing private parts, no sense of shame involved on my end of the bargain, and somehow I get the feeling if I were to look at this site in public people'd realize I'm on a message board and not looking at gay porn.

What's the problem here now?

EDIT: I thought the picture was kinda cool looking, even considering the context that Tommathy was using it in (which is obviously nonsexual in nature and only there for the same reason Hiryuu had Priere or Colin had Colleen...).
Zem
Posts: 521/1097
even without the sword that picture as a whole does not exactly fall into the safe-for-work category
Tommathy
Posts: 78/339
Hilt of the... oh, I hadn't noticed.

It does kinda look like a penis when you darken it, huh? Okay, I'll change it tomorrow, I'm sleeepy.
Danielle
Posts: 1641/6737
Agh, I'll show you what I mean tomorrow. I'm a photoshop person, mspaint and I don't get along well, and that's all that's on this computer.
Clockworkz
Posts: 246/984
I concur with Alastor (amazingly). It's just... When I'm in school, I don't want people going "DUDE YOUR LOOKING AT GAY TOON PRON L0SER XD" I thinkit's just a thing of like, respecting where people post, so people around that person (parents, teachers, classmates, etc) don't have to look at penises, ot camel toes, or whetever pseudo hentai layout someone has. I know; I'm nit picking here.
EDIT: And yes, Alastor; very good point
Alastor
Posts: 2287/8204
Dude

Look at the hilt on the sword.
Tommathy
Posts: 77/339
Penis? He's clothed...

Well, mostly clothed.

He's atleast as clothed as Ran-chan's girl, they're both in one-piece suits.

Also, I'm using Opera version 8.51 and the text appears to be in the correct dimensions. It all fits into the 275 by 390 box I defined.
Alastor
Posts: 2281/8204
In Opera at least, the text goes out of the text box a bit. Now good...

Also

I do not particularly like to look at penis. Please change that picture.
Tommathy
Posts: 76/339
Yay, fun!

(posted mostly so that Danielle can make a post when she finishes drawing, although I supppose she could just edit her post, like I"m doing...)
Danielle
Posts: 1630/6737
Meh, I don't know how to explain... let me take a screen cap and draw.
This will be fun. 8D
This is a long thread. Click here to view it.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - Modern Art - Layout, gbargle.


ABII

Acmlmboard 1.92.999, 9/17/2006
©2000-2006 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper

Page rendered in 0.010 seconds; used 359.84 kB (max 420.32 kB)