 |
| Register | Login | |||||
 |
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
|
| Register | Login | |||||
|
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
| 0 users currently in Help, Suggestions, Bug Reports. |
| User | Post |
| HyperHacker Posts: 776/5072 |
Originally posted by Zem Except all on one line. Or else the board will wreck it up. 
Edit by Alastor: And now it's |
| Tarale Posts: 399/2713 |
Originally posted by Metal Man88 What, here or your site? Cause you have a background here. But I don't think that HTML works all that differently here? Does it? I don't code any differently for here than I do for anywhere else, anyways. 
Course, checking your site, it appears you use frames; so maybe that's what you're referring to? |
| Zem Posts: 400/1097 |
Originally posted by Metal Man88 Instead of <link rel="stylesheet" href="http://hgalgha.glhahgla.hglahglagh/algh.css"> or whatever you crazy kids do, use <style type="text/css"> @import url(http://hgalgha.glhahgla.hglahglagh/algh.css); </style> |
| Metal Man88 Posts: 78/701 |
Thanks to chaos theory, it's almost impossible to prevent someone from screwing up HTML if they're allowed to use it on a message board, which allows HTML.
Furthermore, the way layouts work on this board are different from normal HTML, so while I have my own website, I can't even get a picture background to appear on it, for crying out loud. So, I suggest a tutorial. Mainly because even non-average HTML-wrangling mega-Joes can find the way this place uses HTML layouts to be... baffling. And I only know link rel. Could someone conveniently give me an example of how @import is used? |
| 182077607309.34 + Posts: 75/218 |
Yeah, it’s evolution. |
| Tarale Posts: 387/2713 |
Originally posted by Elric Ah yes. Even if you build something idiot-proof, the internet will just provide us with a better idiot  |
| Elric Posts: 163/164 |
My money's on them not only doing both, but also managing to find a least one other way we don't know of to screw things up... |
| Tarale Posts: 377/2713 |
Originally posted by Elric Indeed, although one would hope they'd screw it up in the "ahh my eyes!!" way and not the "ahhh, the board!!" way  |
| Elric Posts: 160/164 |
Except most people here would screw THAT up too. |
| Tarale Posts: 362/2713 |
Originally posted by XkeeperOriginally posted by TaraleYou overestimate most members of this board. overestimate ?
Geez, and I thought I was trying to imply that aside from some people who are excellent with layouts and code that the majority needed help. Hell, if I thought it would be an easy project, I'd suggest a layout maker rather than just @import... Put in the URL for an image, click a radio button to say where it aligns to.... pick a hex color.... blah blah blah... instant (albeit generic) layout
Which would be fine for a lot of users with less broken code... |
| Xkeeper Posts: 884/5653 |
Originally posted by TaraleYou overestimate most members of this board. |
| Tarale Posts: 360/2713 |
Yes, but on learning how to make layouts properly....
uhm... .... uhm....
Well, I shouldn't need to say it. |
| Xkeeper Posts: 879/5653 |
But learning how to make layouts properly will!
ps: that lynx suggestion was a joke pps: kyouji's right |
| Tarale Posts: 359/2713 |
You know what... everybody who is turning this into a browser thing... I can't put this a nicer way right now -- you're idiots.
A high percentage of people at this board use Firefox. This feature -- in addition to making the layout-making process easier for people -- would benefit those users. This particular feature would not negatively impact users of other browsers such as Opera, Camino, Mozilla, Konqueror, Safari, etc. Your goal as a web designer should be to make things as accessible as possible to as many browsers as possible. Zealotry has no place in web design. |
| Alastor Posts: 1849/8204 |
OPERA
Edit: And so no one accuses me of being pointlessly pro-opera again, DAMNED NEAR EVERY MODERN BROWSER THAT ISN'T FIREFOX |
| Sparx Posts: 243/529 |
Your right Why sould they have to do that? It'd be like...um...I forgot the word. But yeah... |
| HyperHacker Posts: 684/5072 |
We shouldn't have to disable layouts or use an inferior browser just because a few people can't code, though. |
| Sparx Posts: 238/529 |
I suggest IE. (Unless that's what your using). Or, there is disable layout... |
| Elric Posts: 158/164 |
It's all about the |
| Tarale Posts: 356/2713 |
The other reason I was suggesting it is because it also helps to eliminate a line of code that a layouter might get wrong / make it easier for layouters
But fine, make everything about the browser |
| This is a long thread. Click here to view it. | |
