Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
2 users currently in General Chat: Ailure, Dark Vampriel | 1 guest
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - General Chat - Not allowed to photograph public sculpture?? | |
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
Apophis

Red Super Koopa
Level: 45

Posts: 313/882
EXP: 640255
For next: 19909

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 15 hours
Last activity: 15 hours
Posted on 02-08-05 07:17 PM Link | Quote
I found the article. http://www.boingboing.net/2005/02/06/chicagos_public_scul.html
Apparently, it was not purchased by the taxpayers, but donated.

Also, just do a google image search for Cloud Gate. There's plenty of pictures of it.


(edited by Apophis on 02-08-05 03:22 PM)
Tarale
I'm not under the alfluence of incohol like some thinkle peop I am. It's just the drunker I sit here the longer I get.

Level: 73

Posts: 1287/2720
EXP: 3458036
For next: 27832

Since: 03-18-04
From: Adelaide, Australia

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 02-09-05 10:10 AM Link | Quote
Hmm.... the fact that it was donated doesn't really make it all that much better.

Besides, are the donators paying for the upkeep? Not according to that article, they're not.
Jill
In love with a dream..
Level: 36

Posts: 434/528
EXP: 296548
For next: 11562

Since: 03-15-04
From: Teh Sweden

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 14 hours
Posted on 02-09-05 01:14 PM Link | Quote
This is just stupid .
Arby
Newcomer
Level: 5

Posts: 7/8
EXP: 369
For next: 160

Since: 02-08-05
From: Ballymena, N Ireland

Since last post: 252 days
Last activity: 239 days
Posted on 02-17-05 02:12 PM Link | Quote
Just a thought: What would they actually do if you were caught taking a picture?
Fine you? Who gets the money? The artist or the council?
Take your camera? Again, who gets the camera?
Take you to court? Jail?

You could get someone to stand in front of the statue, and then if anyone asks, you could say you were photoing the person, not the statue. That way, you'd be off scot free.

I think this is proof that people in general are morons (myself included, by the way).
Sandy53215
Acmlm (10:55:31 PM): they're having fun for the first time in so long
Level: 47

Posts: 338/948
EXP: 713034
For next: 53169

Since: 03-15-04
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin (U.S.A)

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 02-17-05 10:37 PM Link | Quote
That sculpture looks so stupid and looks like a waste of money. To me at least. In some of those pictures it looks as if some other people are taking pictures too.
Sokarhacd

Ball and Chain Trooper
Resistance is Futile
You Will Be Assimilated
Hab SoSlI' Quch
Level: 61

Posts: 1045/1757
EXP: 1799888
For next: 76708

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 02-17-05 11:02 PM Link | Quote
yeah, I agree, that is one ugly sculpture, not worth the money at all....and definently not worth making sure people dont photograph it.
Rain Man

Buzzy Beetle
Level: 31

Posts: 315/378
EXP: 175079
For next: 10284

Since: 04-14-04

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 16 hours
Posted on 02-24-05 04:37 PM Link | Quote
Now put another one beside it, and you egt infinity

Seriously, this is so dumb. Why the hell would they do this? It is a tourist attraction, yet you cant take pictures of it?

Besides, it is ugly and stupid anyway.
neotransotaku

Baby Mario
戻れたら、
誰も気が付く
Level: 87

Posts: 2414/4016
EXP: 6220548
For next: 172226

Since: 03-15-04
From: Outside of Time/Space

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 02-25-05 01:18 AM Link | Quote
what the heck? it's a big blob of shiny mercury...

anyways, it is copyrighted and he believes no one should take a photograph of it--yet the state of illinois has it published on their website for tourism. So, what makes the governement different from the public?
Crystal Shards

Keese
Level: 19

Posts: 123/126
EXP: 34318
For next: 1459

Since: 03-23-04
From: Ontario, Canada

Since last post: 95 days
Last activity: 130 days
Posted on 02-28-05 01:11 AM Link | Quote
I think it looks neat.

This reminds me of something that happened at the Eaton's Centre in Toronto... The owners of the mall paid an artist to make a peice which turned out to be a flock of geese... They're suspended from the celing and it looks REALLY neat. But one year the owners put little santa hats on all the geese at Christmas time and the author sued. 'Cos he was a jerk. And won. Even though the Eaton's Centre had paid for and bought the geese, the owner still had the copyright, and the case was closed with something about "Intellectual property" still belonging to the owner? I don't know.
But yeah. Rich artists are assholes. Or totally bat-shit insane.
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - General Chat - Not allowed to photograph public sculpture?? | |


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.017 seconds.