Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
2 users currently in General Chat: Ailure, Dark Vampriel | 1 guest
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - General Chat - A picture tells a thousand words | |
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
Apple

Kodondo
Level: 38

Posts: 573/594
EXP: 350163
For next: 20284

Since: 03-27-04
From: Washington.

Since last post: 264 days
Last activity: 152 days
Posted on 01-26-05 01:15 PM Link | Quote
Boredom struck when I was doing a history paper and to make a semi-long story short. I'm now writing a paper on the discovery of America.



Look at that map. It was drawn by Al-Masudi who was a Muslim historian and geographer. Notice the large island off the coast of Africa. That is South America.

The map predates both Columbus and Leif Ericson by roughly 100 and 600 years respectfully. Which would put the first dsicovers of America** as Muslims.

**Not including those who came via the Bering Landbridge and those with no solid edvidence.





I'm writing a paper on it for my World History class and several of internet sources list several books where they got their sources from and I'm trying to track down said books and read them
Cymoro
PATRICK DUFFY WILL LASER YOUR SOUL


Level: 67

Posts: 1556/2216
EXP: 2549743
For next: 43129

Since: 03-15-04
From: Cymoro Gaming

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 01-26-05 04:27 PM Link | Quote
There is a chance it is, unless it's Madagascar or Australia (But then, why would it be so close?). Is there any source that mentions that island? I just don't think you'd want to lose a few points by accidentaly calling Madagascar the "new world".

And I believe Leif came before Columbus. That may had been a typo on your part.
Legault

Bot
Level: 24

Posts: 41/269
EXP: 78075
For next: 50

Since: 12-24-04
From: Schools out...YES!!! Summer vacation.

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 4 days
Posted on 01-26-05 05:41 PM Link | Quote
No actually that could be South America because of the Pangea Theory. Which states that all continents were once connected.
Vystrix Nexoth

Level: 30

Posts: 239/348
EXP: 158678
For next: 7191

Since: 03-15-04
From: somewhere between anima and animus

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 2 days
Posted on 01-26-05 08:49 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Anarchy99
No actually that could be South America because of the Pangea Theory. Which states that all continents were once connected.
Yes... many millions of years ago. This map is from around 600-1000 years (just plain old years) ago; and the theory of continental drift / plate tectonics is far more recent than that.
Brunken Drawler

Tektite
Level: 12

Posts: 53/56
EXP: 7539
For next: 382

Since: 12-13-04

Since last post: 277 days
Last activity: 203 days
Posted on 01-26-05 09:25 PM Link | Quote
Interesting... We finished the "Islam" chapter... I'm guessing your a sophmore (SP? )? I wish I lived back then... Nothing but Peace and Nature. : drifts off in a dream :
The Guru of Furu

Ninji
Level: 26

Posts: 121/240
EXP: 90642
For next: 11633

Since: 03-18-04
From: Cali

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 7 hours
Posted on 01-26-05 09:27 PM Link | Quote
Yeah, the idea of a pangea is way before the time of humans. If you look at the world, there is virtually no recognizable movement throught human history. Anyways, very interesting, but I'd definately check up on that if you only found it on a website. Don't base your entire report on that one site, make sure you find something that is published on that so that there is some legitimacy to the image. But if it's true, very cool.
MathOnNapkins

Math n' Hacks
Level: 67

Posts: 1335/2189
EXP: 2495887
For next: 96985

Since: 03-18-04
From: Base Tourian

Since last post: 1 hour
Last activity: 32 min.
Posted on 01-27-05 12:54 AM Link | Quote
Well, I don't know much about Arab Geography, but if you want to read the arabic text on the map you have to turn it upside down.

The lower island has the words edebii mujoula at the bottom, and irhenii mujoula. (It's really hard to make out the letters, it's only an approximation) I think I'll ask my teacher about this.
alte Hexe

Star Mario
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
"But Joe you're ten years dead!"
"I never died" said he
"I never died!" said he
Level: 99

Posts: 2670/5458
EXP: 9854489
For next: 145511

Since: 03-15-04
From: ...

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 01-27-05 12:56 AM Link | Quote
That has been a much argued map. As is the map of Antarctica that went missing. The general fringe thought is that the Japanese discovered the new world in and around 600-1100 AD as various islands off the coast of South America have had Japanese pottery on it.
Kitten Yiffer

Purple wand
Furry moderator
Vivent l'exp����¯�¿�½������©rience de signalisation d'amusement, ou bien !
Level: 135

Posts: 7422/11162
EXP: 28824106
For next: 510899

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 4 min.
Posted on 01-27-05 12:58 AM Link | Quote
Notice that Sweden is an Island on that picture... or is that great britain? Or maybe the left one is GB and right Sweden...

I'm more surprised how accurate it is, rather how inaccurate it is. World maps over a such large area so early on.
Ran-chan

Moldorm
eek, when are they going to stop growing...
Level: 143

Posts: 6948/12781
EXP: 35293588
For next: 538220

Since: 03-15-04
From: Nerima District, Tokyo - Japan

Since last post: 12 hours
Last activity: 12 hours
Posted on 01-27-05 01:05 AM Link | Quote
I can see Sweden on that map. Do you see where Italy should be, Kitten Yiffer?

Right above there is Sweden and Norway.
Ramsus

Octoballoon
Level: 19

Posts: 13/162
EXP: 34651
For next: 1126

Since: 01-24-05
From: United States

Since last post: 39 days
Last activity: 71 days
Posted on 01-27-05 01:07 AM Link | Quote
What if it's just Antarctica? I mean, it's right under Africa, so that'd make more sense to me. Pretty amazing map for several hundred years ago though.
Apple

Kodondo
Level: 38

Posts: 577/594
EXP: 350163
For next: 20284

Since: 03-27-04
From: Washington.

Since last post: 264 days
Last activity: 152 days
Posted on 01-27-05 05:00 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by The Guru of Furu
Don't base your entire report on that one site, make sure you find something that is published on that so that there is some legitimacy to the image. But if it's true, very cool.


The image I found on a website but its also published in a book and I have found a few websites that that draw sources from several books. I'm still trying to track down those books actually.

Originally posted by Cymoro
There is a chance it is, unless it's Madagascar or Australia (But then, why would it be so close?). Is there any source that mentions that island? I just don't think you'd want to lose a few points by accidentaly calling Madagascar the "new world".

And I believe Leif came before Columbus. That may had been a typo on your part.


Its way to off to be Madagascar or Australia. Besides, Al-Masudi, who made the map, wrote about a Muslim navigator named Khashkhash who sailed into the west Altanic and returned with strange and unknown treasure. I would also think that Madagascar culture wouldn't be strange to them since they did trade with Africans.

And the Columbus/Leif thing was a typo.


Originally posted by Brunken Drawler
Interesting... We finished the "Islam" chapter... I'm guessing your a sophmore (SP? )? I wish I lived back then... Nothing but Peace and Nature. : drifts off in a dream :


Second Year senior. Its nothing to do with an Islam chapter/unit/whatever. I get to choose my own topics for papers.

Originally posted by Ziffski
That has been a much argued map. As is the map of Antarctica that went missing. The general fringe thought is that the Japanese discovered the new world in and around 600-1100 AD as various islands off the coast of South America have had Japanese pottery on it.


Very interesting, I haven't heard about the Japanese theory. I've heard they found a Chinese Junk off the coast of California dating back to the 1000-1100's. Which would be 100-200 years after the Muslims and Japan has way too big of a range to really say they were the first. You could also argue the Egyptians if you wanted to. (Using the whole Cocaine/Nictone found in mummies as well as its being proven that they could of reached America with their seafaring technology).

And Pottery was a good. Europeans traded for it. Its not to far fetched to say some European bought old Japanese pottery and crashed off of the coast of South America. Plus theres way more than just pottery suggesting Muslims came to America. Native American clothing, Native American names, Some native American religions. Not to mention the hundreds of stories about Muslims coming to America from 889ad to 1200ad and the amount of detail involved with the tales. Its one thing to say "We left spain, found america, came back" but they don't. Its more of a "So and so, from this city, who lived from this year until this year, left this port in this year, during the reign of so and so (Than give the years of the reign) traveled here than here before going there and they returned on such and such year" thing. The stories are very detailed for being so old.

Originally posted by Kitten Yiffer
Notice that Sweden is an Island on that picture... or is that great britain? Or maybe the left one is GB and right Sweden...

I'm more surprised how accurate it is, rather how inaccurate it is. World maps over a such large area so early on.


I thought the big island was England the one next to it was Ireland. It also appears they didn't explore higher than Denmark by that time. I was more surpised that it appears it has India, Tde Himilayas (sp?), and part of the far south east on it than the islands off the coast of Europe.

geeogree

Bloober
Level: 34

Posts: 276/448
EXP: 231583
For next: 22068

Since: 03-16-04
From: Calgary, Canada

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 11 hours
Posted on 01-27-05 05:03 AM Link | Quote
there are a lot of groups of people that have ties to america...

the orientals came across, whether by land bridge, or by boat.... the muslims may have known.... there are ties to jews.... the vikings came before columbus.... and probably a half dozen others....
blackhole89

LOLSEALS
Moderator of ROM hacking
EmuNET IRC network admin
Head GM of TwilightRO
Level: 47

Posts: 519/971
EXP: 739208
For next: 26995

Since: 03-15-04
From: Dresden/Germany

Since last post: 14 hours
Last activity: 12 hours
Posted on 01-27-05 10:10 PM Link | Quote
That map doesn't look as if it were really old... I mean, the precision about the mediterranean area is unrealistically high for the time period it pretends to be from... look at portuguese maps from 6 centuries later and you'll know what I mean.
FreeDOS

Lava Lotus
Wannabe-Mod :<
Level: 59

Posts: 1041/1657
EXP: 1648646
For next: 24482

Since: 03-15-04
From: Seattle

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 01-27-05 11:28 PM Link | Quote
Doesn't anyone remember from history class that the Vikings traveled to North America (northeastern Canada) in the 11th and 12th centuries?
Jesper
Busy, busy, busy.
Level: 69

Posts: 1768/2390
EXP: 2856000
For next: 13743

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden.

Since last post: 176 days
Last activity: 79 days
Posted on 01-28-05 12:38 AM Link | Quote
Yup. Vinland.
hhallahh

Bob-Omb
Level: 38

Posts: 495/607
EXP: 365476
For next: 4971

Since: 03-15-04
From: Portland, OR

Since last post: 73 days
Last activity: 60 days
Posted on 01-28-05 08:58 AM Link | Quote
As long as we're making speculative historical bullshit assertions, I'd like to assert that the Africans discovered America before anyone else, as evidenced by the African statues on Easter Island.

Oh, and the Egyptians also had gliders that they flew around on.

/bullshit history is fun
Apple

Kodondo
Level: 38

Posts: 580/594
EXP: 350163
For next: 20284

Since: 03-27-04
From: Washington.

Since last post: 264 days
Last activity: 152 days
Posted on 01-28-05 12:49 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by hhallahh
As long as we're making speculative historical bullshit assertions, I'd like to assert that the Africans discovered America before anyone else, as evidenced by the African statues on Easter Island.


I love closemindedness

The Vikings discovered America in the 1000's. It was proven in the 1960's. For 900+ years no one believed they did. It was proven and about 70% of the world still doesn't believe it.


Why is it so much bullshit to believe that the Muslims were perhaps here before the Vikings? I just find the it amusing that the story of Columbus has a lot of ties to the Muslim legends...

Spain. A country from 710ad until 1492ad was a muslim country. In most legends, muslim navigators left from Palos Spain (so did Columbus). These legends were (and still are) believed by the majority of Muslims. The people of Spain would of grown up hearing tails about it. Spain was the ONLY country willing to fund Columbus. Consequence? Maybe.


Ah well, I personally enjoy questioning what I was/am taught in history class and I do happen to believe that America was discovered by Muslims. Which makes me unAmerican and brainedwash by Arabic propaganda (I LOVE ARTICLES BY RIGHTWING AMERICAS! )





Side note: I was having fun trying to connect the Egyptians to Mesoamerica last month. Its not totally impossible but I don't believe it. Still was a fun thing to read about
MobleSprout

Shyguy
Level: 17

Posts: 45/91
EXP: 21215
For next: 3528

Since: 03-15-04
From: Philly

Since last post: 26 days
Last activity: 26 days
Posted on 02-05-05 01:41 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Apple

The map predates both Columbus and Leif Ericson by roughly 100 and 600 years respectfully. Which would put the first dsicovers of America** as Muslims.

**Not including those who came via the Bering Landbridge and those with no solid edvidence.


Recent evidence is coming to light (from rediscovered Chinese charter documents) that instead of every other race in the entire world discovering America first, the Chinese did. I read it in an article pimping the book the historian was reading, and I don't remember all of his supporting evidence, but scholars are tending to turn in that direction now.

All means considered, the Chinese mastered boat travel well before any other culture, and given the enormous reach of Chinese-branched cultures in the early couple centuries A.D., it seems entirely likely that the Chinese had stumbled upon the West coast (or what is NOW the West coast, as it could very well have been islandic then) previously to the Muslims, the Africans, the Americans, the Icelandics and the Fraggles.

Check out these books for a start into reference:

Here
And Here

There's more scholarly ones out there but I don't feel like looking for them

edit: sorry, tablebreaking

edit 2: one last edit - i forgot to mention that the chinese were the first to discover North America's USA territory. I'd blanked out on the vikings. But they don't matter.
Stupid Swedes.


(edited by MobleSprout on 02-04-05 09:42 PM)
(edited by MobleSprout on 02-04-05 09:44 PM)
(edited by MobleSprout on 02-04-05 09:50 PM)
Apple

Kodondo
Level: 38

Posts: 586/594
EXP: 350163
For next: 20284

Since: 03-27-04
From: Washington.

Since last post: 264 days
Last activity: 152 days
Posted on 02-05-05 08:49 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by MobleSprout
Originally posted by Apple

The map predates both Columbus and Leif Ericson by roughly 100 and 600 years respectfully. Which would put the first dsicovers of America** as Muslims.

**Not including those who came via the Bering Landbridge and those with no solid edvidence.


Recent evidence is coming to light (from rediscovered Chinese charter documents) that instead of every other race in the entire world discovering America first, the Chinese did. I read it in an article pimping the book the historian was reading, and I don't remember all of his supporting evidence, but scholars are tending to turn in that direction now.

All means considered, the Chinese mastered boat travel well before any other culture, and given the enormous reach of Chinese-branched cultures in the early couple centuries A.D., it seems entirely likely that the Chinese had stumbled upon the West coast (or what is NOW the West coast, as it could very well have been islandic then) previously to the Muslims, the Africans, the Americans, the Icelandics and the Fraggles.

Check out these books for a start into reference:

Here
And Here

There's more scholarly ones out there but I don't feel like looking for them

edit: sorry, tablebreaking

edit 2: one last edit - i forgot to mention that the chinese were the first to discover North America's USA territory. I'd blanked out on the vikings. But they don't matter.
Stupid Swedes.


I've heard about 1421 and seen a few people discuss it on misc message boards but I haven't seen anyone yet (Who wasn't Chinese) say anything good about it except it was interesting. I haven't read it yet so I'll look for it and Fusang when I go to the library next time.
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - General Chat - A picture tells a thousand words | |


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.016 seconds.