Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
2 users currently in General Chat: Ailure, Dark Vampriel | 1 guest
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - General Chat - AcmlmBoard 1.A1 to be released on the fourth anniversary. | | Thread closed
Pages: 1 2 3 4Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
Xeolord

- B l u e s -
Power Metal > All
Level: 81

Posts: 1062/3418
EXP: 4884196
For next: 108653

Since: 03-15-04
From: Yeah

Since last post: 15 hours
Last activity: 15 hours
Posted on 01-23-05 07:23 AM Link
So what's this "special" thing we're going to get tommorow? Do I have the freedom of guessing?

The ability for users to customize what links show up and in what order in profiles!!! Wow! Hey, seems it would make a lot of people happy.

Usergroups?

Maybe a hentai forum??

Maybe a Xeogred forum??

CSS layouts? Layout user creation? Custom scheme editor? User create rank sets?

I'm out of ideas. >____<
DarkSlaya
POOOOOOOOOOOORN!
Level: 88

Posts: 3302/4249
EXP: 6409254
For next: 241410

Since: 05-16-04
From: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Since last post: 8 hours
Last activity: 5 hours
Posted on 01-23-05 07:24 AM Link
Originally posted by Xeogred
Maybe a hentai forum??



That'd be cool.


But it won't ever happen, not here.
Xeolord

- B l u e s -
Power Metal > All
Level: 81

Posts: 1064/3418
EXP: 4884196
For next: 108653

Since: 03-15-04
From: Yeah

Since last post: 15 hours
Last activity: 15 hours
Posted on 01-23-05 07:28 AM Link
Originally posted by Sex Change
Originally posted by Xeogred
Maybe a hentai forum??



That'd be cool.


But it won't ever happen, not here.


Haha. =P

It's funny though, considering there seems to be an overpopulation of overly obsessive "cat girl" freaks here.

To no offense. *laughs*

No, can't say tails amuse me.


(edited by Xeogred on 01-22-05 10:28 PM)
DarkSlaya
POOOOOOOOOOOORN!
Level: 88

Posts: 3303/4249
EXP: 6409254
For next: 241410

Since: 05-16-04
From: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Since last post: 8 hours
Last activity: 5 hours
Posted on 01-23-05 07:31 AM Link
Originally posted by Xeogred

It's funny though, considering there seems to be an overpopulation of overly obsessive "cat girl" freaks here.


For your information, catgirls doesn't necessary mean hentai.

But most of the pics of catgirls you'll find tend to be ecchi.

....

*Sex Change gets back on topic.

A feature to block PMs from banned users would be nice.
Lenophis

Super Koopa
Level: 44

Posts: 326/830
EXP: 584360
For next: 26925

Since: 03-15-04
From: Duluth, MN

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 01-23-05 08:31 AM Link
Originally posted by Jesper
I don't know how you define ego, but you're the one with the dirty mind here, I think.

Two things.
1: I'm not the one who wants to be stroked by everyone.
2: It was a.......................J O K E. You know, that sense of humor stuff. Wait.... you do know what a joke is, right? (Please say yes...)

As for the extra goodies, I'll guess one more time. (Haven't read through the posts yet, so please don't yell too much if it was already discovered.)

Let's see, it could be a battle hack... But that was already shot down. You wouldn't make a big deal out of new ranks or layouts. It must be purely technical, so... hmmm. I'll say an IRC chat client (doubt it though) or a fully revamped RSS feed. Beyond that, I wouldn't know what's left.
Colleen
Administrator
Level: 136

Posts: 6314/11302
EXP: 29369328
For next: 727587

Since: 03-15-04
From: LaSalle, Quebec, Canada

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 01-23-05 08:44 AM Link
Even better - the ability to trigger whether or not banned users are allowed to send PM's.
DarkSlaya
POOOOOOOOOOOORN!
Level: 88

Posts: 3305/4249
EXP: 6409254
For next: 241410

Since: 05-16-04
From: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Since last post: 8 hours
Last activity: 5 hours
Posted on 01-23-05 08:47 AM Link
Originally posted by Colleen
Even better - the ability to trigger whether or not banned users are allowed to send PM's.


I don't think that'd be a good idea, since sometimes they need to explain themselves or having someone explain why they were banned.

Wait a minute, most banned users aren't smart enough to ask.

---

And for some reason, I'm fooling some people because of a certain thing that I get to feel the wrath of a banned user.
||bass
Programmer Admin
Level: 44

Posts: 180/817
EXP: 570813
For next: 40472

Since: 03-15-04
From: Salem, Connecticut

Since last post: 26 days
Last activity: 11 days
Posted on 01-23-05 09:13 AM Link
There's already a feature in the works for users to communicate privately to staff without the use of private messages. Colleen's idea is actually on the good side.
knuck

Hinox
Banned until 19-58-5815: trolling, flaming, spamming, being a general fucktard...
Level: 62

Posts: 1076/1818
EXP: 1894574
For next: 90112

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 14 hours
Last activity: 9 hours
Posted on 01-23-05 09:16 AM Link
So if a friend of mine get banned, i can't ask why as he won't be able to answer?
Sorry but that's stupid. IPban would handle people who shouldn't use Private messages.
Xeolord

- B l u e s -
Power Metal > All
Level: 81

Posts: 1068/3418
EXP: 4884196
For next: 108653

Since: 03-15-04
From: Yeah

Since last post: 15 hours
Last activity: 15 hours
Posted on 01-23-05 10:36 AM Link
Yeah, that's an ability that all users, regardless of status, should be able to use.

Being able to "block" people, like Sex Change said would be a better idea than just insantly taking away that ability from someone.

I've also found it interesting how admins can read users Private messages, correct me if I'm wrong, but this is the only board system that actually allows something like that.
Lenophis

Super Koopa
Level: 44

Posts: 327/830
EXP: 584360
For next: 26925

Since: 03-15-04
From: Duluth, MN

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 01-23-05 10:38 AM Link
Originally posted by knuck
So if a friend of mine get banned, i can't ask why as he won't be able to answer?
Sorry but that's stupid. IPban would handle people who shouldn't use Private messages.

If someone got themselves banned, they probably did something to deserve it. Just like money, people earn their bans. So put up with it.


My two cents.
tuna
...
Level: 3

Posts: 107/2
EXP: 51
For next: 77

Since: 12-02-04

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
Posted on 01-23-05 03:13 PM Link
Originally posted by ||bass
There's already a feature in the works for users to communicate privately to staff without the use of private messages. Colleen's idea is actually on the good side.
What would be the point? Unless you could communicate with all staff (and even then I have problems finding a reason for it) PMing still works fine.

Xeogred: They can, trust me (I should know ) ... what's even better is that afaik they're only supposed to do it if, say, someone's suspected of PM spamming.
Ran-chan

Moldorm
eek, when are they going to stop growing...
Level: 143

Posts: 6841/12781
EXP: 35293588
For next: 538220

Since: 03-15-04
From: Nerima District, Tokyo - Japan

Since last post: 12 hours
Last activity: 12 hours
Posted on 01-23-05 06:04 PM Link
Originally posted by Xeogred


Maybe a hentai forum??



And Melvin as local mod over it but he
Jesper
Busy, busy, busy.
Level: 69

Posts: 1681/2390
EXP: 2856000
For next: 13743

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden.

Since last post: 176 days
Last activity: 79 days
Posted on 01-23-05 06:33 PM Link
Originally posted by knuck
Originally posted by dan
Yes, you gave a suggestion. But it was rejected. More than once. One of these days, you'll probably learn that when people reject a suggestion of yours multiple times, it's prudent to drop it.

Heh, we can but dream.
I think board users should start reading a thread before posting.
knuck

Hinox
Banned until 19-58-5815: trolling, flaming, spamming, being a general fucktard...
Level: 62

Posts: 1077/1818
EXP: 1894574
For next: 90112

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 14 hours
Last activity: 9 hours
Posted on 01-23-05 08:58 PM Link
Originally posted by Lenophis
If someone got themselves banned, they probably did something to deserve it. Just like money, people earn their bans.
Like when Kario got PERMAbanned without reason? Or like when i got permabanned without reason?


(edited by knuck on 01-23-05 12:03 PM)
Xeolord

- B l u e s -
Power Metal > All
Level: 81

Posts: 1070/3418
EXP: 4884196
For next: 108653

Since: 03-15-04
From: Yeah

Since last post: 15 hours
Last activity: 15 hours
Posted on 01-23-05 09:10 PM Link
Originally posted by Alexa
Originally posted by ||bass
There's already a feature in the works for users to communicate privately to staff without the use of private messages. Colleen's idea is actually on the good side.
What would be the point? Unless you could communicate with all staff (and even then I have problems finding a reason for it) PMing still works fine.

Xeogred: They can, trust me (I should know ) ... what's even better is that afaik they're only supposed to do it if, say, someone's suspected of PM spamming.


I honestly have no clue who you are, but you're smart. (Xk?)

I'm surprised you can remember such incidents ... what can I say? 2 years can change a person.

Yeah ... going back and looking in the past ... saddens me.

That is of course, if we're thinking of the same thing.

But, that can be saved for another discussion surely.


(edited by Xeogred on 01-23-05 12:25 PM)
(edited by Xeogred on 01-23-05 12:26 PM)
Jesper
Busy, busy, busy.
Level: 69

Posts: 1686/2390
EXP: 2856000
For next: 13743

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden.

Since last post: 176 days
Last activity: 79 days
Posted on 01-23-05 09:58 PM Link
Originally posted by knuck
Originally posted by Jesper
We can't change stuff just because two people don't like it.
Now tell me: how many people PMed you asking to change the old layout? That's right.
Agreed: It was an unsolicited change. How many people have complained? Two.

Originally posted by knuck
Originally posted by Jesper
AIM. ICQ. IRC. E-mail - you know, the thing that's required to register here.
They weren't since the start, and there are some users who DOESN't have icq, aim or go to irc. Some don't put email in the field.
And this is our problem how? If you were really friends with them, you'd probably have other means of contacting them.

Originally posted by knuck
Originally posted by Jesper
we'd risk banning existing members. ISPs routinely have dynamic IPs; we'd risk banning existing members.
Funny how in 4 years it never happened. Ok maybe it did, 1 or 2 times maybe?
It's happened in actuality around five times, and I have only been admin for three of the four years. As someone who's not an admin I thought you'd hold off those comments; you have absolutely no insight into what happens. I know we've had to hold back several IP bans just because it'd mean we'd block other users, and in many cases even staff members.

Originally posted by knuck
Banned users were allowed to do a few stuff at the board, now they can't even see online.php nor send PMs (the later might be on soon enough). I can see the time were a IPban will work just like a normal ban. Complete block from the board.
Such a shame, right? Users who have been banned here have been banned for a reason. Being at this board, or having access to a specific function is a privilege, not a right in any way whatsoever. The easiest way to make sure you don't lose access to any functions is to not get banned. If you disagree with this policy, you're free to leave at any time.

You got permabanned with a reason, for blatantly breaking an addenum to the rules in an announcement, and you were lucky Acmlm decided to lift the ban. Ignorance of the rules is no excuse.

Xkeeper probably holds a grudge against me because I checked some of his PMs just a few weeks ago - with a very legitimate reason, no less.
windwaker

Ball and Chain Trooper
WHY ALL THE MAYONNAISE HATE
Level: 61

Posts: 1022/1797
EXP: 1860597
For next: 15999

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 6 days
Posted on 01-23-05 10:07 PM Link
I'm all for checking PM's for a legit reason, like you think there're hentai links in one, but it's like, really lame to do it otherwise .

And I'll have to agree with knuck; if someone's permabanned and can't send PMs, they'll just make another account/use a proxy; I know I would.
knuck

Hinox
Banned until 19-58-5815: trolling, flaming, spamming, being a general fucktard...
Level: 62

Posts: 1078/1818
EXP: 1894574
For next: 90112

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 14 hours
Last activity: 9 hours
Posted on 01-23-05 10:13 PM Link
Originally posted by Jesper
You got permabanned with a reason, for blatantly breaking an addenum to the rules in an announcement, and you were lucky Acmlm decided to lift the ban. Ignorance of the rules is no excuse.


"The board code has been updated to no longer accept arguements through HTTP GET. Thus, linking to pages with arguements no longer works. Minipics that log people out are useless; they do nothing.

With that in mind, I still plan on banning anyone who even attempts to abuse imagelinks, scripts, or iframes in their profiles/posts. No warnings, no strikes. Permaban on strike one, IPban on strike two"


That was the annoucement you used to justify the permaban.
As you were the one who deleted the script from my profile, you KNOW that the code would do NOTHING to the board, therefore it was't abusing board functions.

But hey, let's drop it, dont wanna get offtopic here.
"If you don't like leave" would fit more than "Live the fun posting experience".
Jesper
Busy, busy, busy.
Level: 69

Posts: 1689/2390
EXP: 2856000
For next: 13743

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden.

Since last post: 176 days
Last activity: 79 days
Posted on 01-23-05 10:21 PM Link
Doing *anything* with cookies is according to board policy attempted abuse. PM any admin and they'll basically say the same thing. If you think this is illogical, it's because if we were to define a policy that'd say exactly what you can't do with cookies, we could still be open to loopholes. If you think it sucks because things like these are not written down in the FAQ, you'd be right, but you'd also be looking at a very long FAQ if we were to put down every little thing. (We're working on solving that particular problem.) Again, if you were unsure, you could have PMed an admin (which you didn't).

But yes, let's drop it indeed.

"And I'll have to agree with knuck; if someone's permabanned and can't send PMs, they'll just make another account/use a proxy; I know I would." Which justifies it in the rules how? Exactly.
Pages: 1 2 3 4Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - General Chat - AcmlmBoard 1.A1 to be released on the fourth anniversary. | | Thread closed


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.016 seconds.