Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
0 user currently in Hardware/Software.
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Hardware/Software - Benchmark Your PC | |
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
Kwan
Doesn't have a valid sized userpic. ||bass will be pissed :((((((((
Level: 50

Posts: 1048/1137
EXP: 937111
For next: 10206

Since: 03-15-04
From: Durkadurkastan!

Since last post: 22 days
Last activity: 2 days
Posted on 01-19-05 10:57 PM Link | Quote
Download Aquamark 3

I'm going to test my PC with this benchmark once I downloaded it. Do it too and tell me your results.

If you know of other benchmarks, feel free to post them.

EDIT: 6,686 =(


(edited by Kwan on 01-19-05 05:24 PM)
Karadur

Fire Snake



Level: 48

Posts: 626/1192
EXP: 786444
For next: 37099

Since: 11-02-04
From: Chatham, Ontario, Canada

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 15 hours
Posted on 01-20-05 03:28 AM Link | Quote
I got 7699. According to what the program said, that's decent for playing most new games, so I'm happy with that It really slowed down in two sections. The first one was when it showed the smoke / steam coming out the side of the building, and the second one had something to do with 'Large Vegetation'

In all, I'm happy with that though.
Zem
You can be civil without being flowery, dipshits.
Level: 49

Posts: 606/1107
EXP: 829398
For next: 54485

Since: 06-13-04

Since last post: 131 days
Last activity: 131 days
Posted on 01-20-05 05:26 AM Link | Quote


I was expecting low results, but not that.

Probably because I have a Voodoo3 with third-party drivers. ='(
BMF98567
BLACK HAS BUILT A SILLY DICE-MAZE!
GO!

Current list of BURNING FURY >8( recipients:
- Yiffy Kitten (x2)
- Xkeeper
Level: 53

Posts: 582/1261
EXP: 1094149
For next: 62970

Since: 03-15-04
From: Blobaria
Special Move: Rising Meatloaf Backhand Combo

Since last post: 21 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 01-20-05 05:32 AM Link | Quote
GFX: 1,002
CPU: 5,467
TOTAL: 9,185

Glee!

That was in Windows 98 SE, with relatively conservative BIOS settings (I'm not really a tweaker/overclocker). I'll try it again in 2000 later tonight and see if there's any difference...
Ran-chan

Moldorm
eek, when are they going to stop growing...
Level: 143

Posts: 6735/12781
EXP: 35293588
For next: 538220

Since: 03-15-04
From: Nerima District, Tokyo - Japan

Since last post: 12 hours
Last activity: 12 hours
Posted on 01-20-05 02:07 PM Link | Quote
How the hell did you get 1,002 and 5,467 to 9,185?

I
Sokarhacd

Ball and Chain Trooper
Resistance is Futile
You Will Be Assimilated
Hab SoSlI' Quch
Level: 61

Posts: 987/1757
EXP: 1799888
For next: 76708

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 01-20-05 08:03 PM Link | Quote
6,904

its ok...HL2 can run perfectly and still looks amazing, so im happy.


(edited by ?
Kwan
Doesn't have a valid sized userpic. ||bass will be pissed :((((((((
Level: 50

Posts: 1049/1137
EXP: 937111
For next: 10206

Since: 03-15-04
From: Durkadurkastan!

Since last post: 22 days
Last activity: 2 days
Posted on 01-20-05 09:29 PM Link | Quote
Hm

What are your CPU + Graphics Cards?

I have AMD Barton 3200+ with NVDIA Geforce FX 5200 128MB
Karadur

Fire Snake



Level: 48

Posts: 639/1192
EXP: 786444
For next: 37099

Since: 11-02-04
From: Chatham, Ontario, Canada

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 15 hours
Posted on 01-20-05 09:36 PM Link | Quote
CPU :: AMD Athlon XP 2400+
Graphics Card :: Same as you, but for the sake of completeness, NVIDIA GeForce 5200 128Mb

Originally posted by Trapster
How the hell did you get 1,002 and 5,467 to 9,185?



The program totals it up for you, so there must be extra calculations instead of just adding the two numbers


(edited by Karadur on 01-20-05 12:37 PM)
macks

Level: 45

Posts: 547/900
EXP: 659955
For next: 209

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 22 hours
Posted on 01-21-05 03:15 AM Link | Quote
I don't remember my exact scores. It was 28,000 total or something.

CPU: Intel Pentium 4 540. (3.20 GHz)
Graphics: ATI Radeon X600 Pro (256MB)
BMF98567
BLACK HAS BUILT A SILLY DICE-MAZE!
GO!

Current list of BURNING FURY >8( recipients:
- Yiffy Kitten (x2)
- Xkeeper
Level: 53

Posts: 584/1261
EXP: 1094149
For next: 62970

Since: 03-15-04
From: Blobaria
Special Move: Rising Meatloaf Backhand Combo

Since last post: 21 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 01-21-05 02:26 PM Link | Quote
CPU: Athlon XP 2700+
GFX: eVGA GeForce FX 5500 256MB

I ran AquaMark again in Windows 2000, and my new score was 9600. I guess Win98 does eat more CPU cycles...

Oh, and... *stabbifies max and steals his computer*
Acmlm

Torosu
heh
Level: 51

Posts: 1015/1173
EXP: 981994
For next: 31944

Since: 03-15-04
From: Somewhere that isn't outside of Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

Since last post: 39 days
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 01-21-05 10:29 PM Link | Quote
I gave it a try, just to see how bad my onboard video really is compared to the rest of my still decent computer, and I'm not too surprised by the results

Specs:
Pentium IV 2.4GHz, 512MB RAM
onboard Intel 82845GL (it's slower than a Geforce2 MX100)

Result:
GFX: 282 (2.83fps render, 97% processing time)
CPU: 4428 (88.5fps simulation, 3%)
Score: 2745 (2.75fps total)

Average framerate per scene:
1- Dynamic occlusion culling3.25
2- High particle count1.63
3- Masked environment mapping3.16
4- Large scale vegetation rendering2.09
5- Large scale terrain rendering3.12
6- Vertex and pixel lighting3.89
7- 3D volumetric fog4.32
8- Complex multimaterial shader2.74
9- Massive overdraw1.99
The framerate ranged from about 0.9 to 6.0 fps, but generally stayed around 2-4 ...
dan

Snap Dragon
Level: 43

Posts: 347/782
EXP: 534516
For next: 30530

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 20 hours
Last activity: 14 hours
Posted on 01-22-05 12:22 AM Link | Quote
GFX score: 1902
CPU score: 4369

AquaMark score: 15630

Not too terrible. It sat at 5-6 fps for a few of the tests (the vegetation one), but it was usually around 20 fps a second. My brother managed a 53611 score with his newly upgraded PC.
Colleen
Administrator
Level: 136

Posts: 6290/11302
EXP: 29369328
For next: 727587

Since: 03-15-04
From: LaSalle, Quebec, Canada

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 01-22-05 06:11 AM Link | Quote
High detail settings, of course...

GFX: 3,468
CPU: 5,979
Total: 26,715

I'm quite satisfied. Not that out of date YET.
windwaker

Ball and Chain Trooper
WHY ALL THE MAYONNAISE HATE
Level: 61

Posts: 1016/1797
EXP: 1860597
For next: 15999

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 6 days
Posted on 01-22-05 06:44 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Kwan
Hm

What are your CPU + Graphics Cards?

I have AMD Barton 3200+ with NVDIA Geforce FX 5200 128MB


I HAVE THE EXACT SAME THING, OMFG.

Serusly.
Colleen
Administrator
Level: 136

Posts: 6292/11302
EXP: 29369328
For next: 727587

Since: 03-15-04
From: LaSalle, Quebec, Canada

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 01-22-05 07:54 AM Link | Quote
I used an ATI Radeon 9600 Pro with an Athlon XP 2500+ processor and my store cleaned Kwan's clock. (I can't remember the video card hierarchy off the top of my head but I'll guess I won that battle.)
BMF98567
BLACK HAS BUILT A SILLY DICE-MAZE!
GO!

Current list of BURNING FURY >8( recipients:
- Yiffy Kitten (x2)
- Xkeeper
Level: 53

Posts: 586/1261
EXP: 1094149
For next: 62970

Since: 03-15-04
From: Blobaria
Special Move: Rising Meatloaf Backhand Combo

Since last post: 21 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 01-22-05 03:48 PM Link | Quote
I'm gathering from everyone else's results (mostly Dan's and Colleen's) that my CPU is more than adequate, but my video card is proving to be a HUGE bottleneck, as it has the biggest impact on the final score. Is the FX 5500 really such a lousy card?
Ran-chan

Moldorm
eek, when are they going to stop growing...
Level: 143

Posts: 6809/12781
EXP: 35293588
For next: 538220

Since: 03-15-04
From: Nerima District, Tokyo - Japan

Since last post: 12 hours
Last activity: 12 hours
Posted on 01-22-05 11:53 PM Link | Quote
I have an ATI Radeon 9800 pro with an AMD Athlon 64 3000+. I think I
Kwan
Doesn't have a valid sized userpic. ||bass will be pissed :((((((((
Level: 50

Posts: 1061/1137
EXP: 937111
For next: 10206

Since: 03-15-04
From: Durkadurkastan!

Since last post: 22 days
Last activity: 2 days
Posted on 01-23-05 05:38 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by BMF54123
I'm gathering from everyone else's results (mostly Dan's and Colleen's) that my CPU is more than adequate, but my video card is proving to be a HUGE bottleneck, as it has the biggest impact on the final score. Is the FX 5500 really such a lousy card?


*Grabs stuff from the log*

GFX score: 702
CPU score: 7160
AquaMark score: 6686

Seems like missing out on a video card when buying this new PC dragged it down a notch
Emptyeye
I am a real American!
Real American
Level: 67

Posts: 1275/2273
EXP: 2488421
For next: 104451

Since: 05-24-04
From: I DUNNOOOOOOOO!!

Since last post: 9 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 01-23-05 06:42 AM Link | Quote
I tried it, and got the "No graphics card detected" error, which if you ask me ranks up there with "keyboard not found. Press any key to continue." for stupid error messages.

Oh well.

EDIT: I have no idea what the hell "setupid" is. STUPID, on the other hand...


(edited by Emptyeye on 01-23-05 10:06 PM)
Darth Coby

Vire
Dacht je nou echt dat het over was?
Dacht je nou echt dat ik gebroken was? Nee toch?
Nou kijk eens goed op uit je ogen gast.
zonder clic heb je geen kloten tjap... bitch
Level: 55

Posts: 1062/1371
EXP: 1240774
For next: 73415

Since: 03-15-04
From: Belgium

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 9 hours
Posted on 01-24-05 03:01 AM Link | Quote
GFX: 8,730
CPU: 9,955
TOTAL: 60,701

I got picture proof if required.
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Hardware/Software - Benchmark Your PC | |


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.015 seconds.