 |
| Register | Login | |||||
 |
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| ACS
| Commons
| Calendar
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat |
|
| | ||
|
| Register | Login | |||||
|
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| ACS
| Commons
| Calendar
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat |
|
| | ||
| 0 user currently in Programming. | 3 guests |
| Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Programming - .NET or not to dot net? |
 |  |  |
| Pages: 1 2 | Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
Do you have .net installed?| i am recently writing a program in .net and realized the installation of .net framework is 20mb -_- | Yes i do have .net installed |
52.0%, 13 votes | No i do not have .net!!!! |
48.0%, 12 votes | im still using 95 O_O or lower |
|
0.0%, 0 vote | Multi-voting is disabled.
| |
| User | Post | ||
FreeDOS Lava Lotus Wannabe-Mod :< Level: 59 Posts: 700/1657 EXP: 1648646 For next: 24482 Since: 03-15-04 From: Seattle Since last post: 6 hours Last activity: 4 hours |
| ||
GUIs existed before the Macintosh or PC, for that matter.  |
|||
|
Squash Monster New Age Retro Hippie Togateiru Fohku Kohgeki!! GRUNGE no HAMSTER otona bite Peace love and turnpike! Level: 40 Posts: 385/677 EXP: 430507 For next: 10802 Since: 03-15-04 From: Maryland (of the Country Between Canada and Mexico) Since last post: 5 hours Last activity: 5 hours |
| ||
| Then replace Mac in what Jesper said with Xerox, then. It still stands. | |||
|
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69  Posts: 861/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| ||
Originally posted by FreeDOSAnd .NET existed before we knew about it. I think not more than say 10,000 people in the US had even considered GUIs when it was still in PARC (and noone from the outside had seen it yet). The GUI got widely recognized with the Mac, and the .NET got widely recognized about two or three years ago, as in "most people has heard of the term somewhere", although it's still building up. |
|||
neotransotaku Baby Mario 戻れたら、 誰も気が付く Level: 87 Posts: 1330/4016 EXP: 6220548 For next: 172226 Since: 03-15-04 From: Outside of Time/Space Since last post: 11 hours Last activity: 1 hour |
| ||
| It is going to be a while before .NET is the main thing offered my microsoft. They are gradually phasing out their older Visual Studio series. It will be a while before you have to use .NET if you want to develop via Microsoft, but that is from the corporate point of view. But as an amateur programmer, nothing says you have to use .NET nor do you have to use Java, or C, or VB. As long as the language does what you want it to do, who cares. Also, C# isn't a only .NET thing. There are C# compilers that will compile into binary executables that do not depend on the runtimes. However, they do not get the adequate testing that Microsoft or other corporations do and thus your code might be correct but the compiler is at fault. |
|||
Parasyte Bullet Bill Level: 35  Posts: 148/514 EXP: 267348 For next: 12588 Since: 05-25-04 Since last post: 104 days Last activity: 32 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Jesper Shaw! I figure you could have distinguished the difference rather easily. Afterall, you did end up calling me a "ROM hacking veteran" ... That should be a good hint that I have at least half a brain. Maybe not much more than half, but at least half, you know? Oh well. Oh, speaking of interpreted applications which attempt to avoid memory leaks and segmentation faults and whatnot... Did we all forget that even interpreted applications are not error proof? I mean, they aren't any less error prone, even. How many Visual Basic programs have you seen which exit with such-and-such error message? Probably quite a few, if you've used any VB apps at all. Just because the interpreter can catch an error such as "Subscript out of range" does not mean it's any better at preventing and\or fixing the problem than any other program. *shrug* |
|||
dan Snap Dragon Level: 43  Posts: 167/782 EXP: 534516 For next: 30530 Since: 03-15-04 Since last post: 20 hours Last activity: 14 hours |
| ||
Originally posted by JesperOriginally posted by FreeDOSMono? dotGNU is also another non-Microsoft version of the .NET framework. It's probably not as complete as Mono, but at least it has a System.Windows.Forms implementation (basically, the whole GUI part of the proper .NET framework, which Mono lacks). Once Mono gains that feature, I can see it getting a lot more popular. (Currently, it's just one of those quirky new things that nobody really writes serious stuff in) |
| Pages: 1 2 | Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
| Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Programming - .NET or not to dot net? |
| | |
(Quick edit for clarity: Yes, I know Microsoft isn't maintaining Mono.