Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
1 user currently in Rom Hacking: hukka | 2 guests
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Rom Hacking - Rom hacking Wiki? | |
Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
Smallhacker

Green Birdo

SMW Hacking Moderator
Level: 68

Posts: 467/2273
EXP: 2647223
For next: 81577

Since: 03-15-04
From: Söderhamn, Sweden

Since last post: 10 hours
Last activity: 9 hours
Posted on 09-01-04 11:44 PM Link | Quote
I've got the wierdest idea ever... What if somebody made a Rom hacking Wiki where people could add hacking information about any game to any system? The idea could be a great success or a big mistake. Nothing else.

Good:
If lots of people use it and adds info, it could easily become the biggest Rom Hacking information source ever.

Ways to make it good:
Lots of "advertising" on other large rom hacking forums.
Good Wiki system.
Make sure that people add enough info to make it interesting
Some other stuff...

Bad:
Maybe only a few are adding info/reading, which would make the system pointless.

Ways to make it bad:
Anything else.

I'm not saying that I am/somebody are going to do it. I would just like to say it in case somebody would think that this is a good idea and make it.

Comments?
MathOnNapkins

Math n' Hacks
Level: 67

Posts: 402/2189
EXP: 2495887
For next: 96985

Since: 03-18-04
From: Base Tourian

Since last post: 1 hour
Last activity: 32 min.
Posted on 09-02-04 12:32 AM Link | Quote
Dunno. I'm always inclined to believe that some dumb asshole would add incorrect information. Perhaps a more privately managed wiki would be more appropriate. One where you have to register to see and use it, and can be banned for posting crap that is incorrect.
Gavin

Fuzzy
Rhinoceruses don't play games. They fucking charge your ass.
Level: 43

Posts: 151/799
EXP: 551711
For next: 13335

Since: 03-15-04
From: IL, USA

Since last post: 13 hours
Last activity: 13 hours
Posted on 09-02-04 01:15 AM Link | Quote
i beleive Dan had the exact same idea, and actually i'm almost certain he still has the Wiki up on his page right now.. but then again i know he's a lazy bastard like me and i'm not sure if he plans on using it anymore...
Heian-794

Red Super Koopa
Level: 44

Posts: 420/896
EXP: 611014
For next: 271

Since: 06-01-04
From: Kyoto, Japan

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 10 days
Posted on 09-02-04 04:53 AM Link | Quote
Sounds great! I'm an occasional contributor to Wikipedia and love it.
dan

Snap Dragon
Level: 43

Posts: 148/782
EXP: 534516
For next: 30530

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 20 hours
Last activity: 14 hours
Posted on 09-02-04 05:24 AM Link | Quote
Yeah, I had this idea a while back. I've got a basic wiki running on my website, but it's not really meant for a public website though. Because the wiki software that's running is crap. (MediaWiki would probably be the best wiki software to use, as it can be set up to only allow registered people to edit, and it has rollback features. Plus it's what Wikipedia is run on ) Plus, I'm a lazy bastard like Gavin said.

But I think it's a great idea, even if only one or two people contribute it could still work out great.
Zidane
Newcomer
Level: 5

Posts: 5/8
EXP: 475
For next: 54

Since: 08-18-04
From: Melbourne, Florida

Since last post: 410 days
Last activity: 339 days
Posted on 09-02-04 07:01 AM Link | Quote
It's never work. Well, it might for you guys... but from my past experiences with people from other communities, something like this has never worked. There will only be a few competent people providing useful information, while other people sit back and soak up all the data that's been discovered.

Eventually, those that were actually doing something won't have the time to continue and need to take a break. When that happens, it appears as if the site has gone completely dead; and people will stop contributing data.

Unless you can get a massive amount of people to actually contribute, you'll fail miserably.
HyperLamer
<||bass> and this was the soloution i thought of that was guarinteed to piss off the greatest amount of people

Sesshomaru
Tamaranian

Level: 118

Posts: 1488/8210
EXP: 18171887
For next: 211027

Since: 03-15-04
From: Canada, w00t!
LOL FAD

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 09-02-04 10:53 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by MathOnNapkins
Dunno. I'm always inclined to believe that some dumb asshole would add incorrect information. Perhaps a more privately managed wiki would be more appropriate. One where you have to register to see and use it, and can be banned for posting crap that is incorrect.

Nice idea, but sites that require registration for viewing == sites that suck a lot. For posting, sure, but nobody wants to sign up just to read one page.
d4s

Panser
Level: 29

Posts: 63/325
EXP: 142151
For next: 5734

Since: 03-23-04

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 1 day
Posted on 09-02-04 12:15 PM Link | Quote
the idea is good in theory, but i dont expect you'll get enough contributions.
many people(including myself) like to keep stuff they found out for themselves, especially if said stuff was hard to figure out.
a collection of all memory locations-threads on acmlm would be nice, however.
Jesper
Busy, busy, busy.
Level: 69

Posts: 803/2390
EXP: 2856000
For next: 13743

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden.

Since last post: 176 days
Last activity: 79 days
Posted on 09-02-04 01:25 PM Link | Quote
Actually, an EggVine wiki is in the works, as in it's in place but won't work as advertised. I'll keep you posted, and if it works out I promise to set up an ordinary hacking wiki too. Who knows, if I have, say, seven hours that I'm not doing anything on I might set up mediawiki too.
Kitten Yiffer

Purple wand
Furry moderator
Vivent l'exp����¯�¿�½������©rience de signalisation d'amusement, ou bien !
Level: 135

Posts: 4675/11162
EXP: 28824106
For next: 510899

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 4 min.
Posted on 09-02-04 01:29 PM Link | Quote
Yeah that would be great, especially for Eggvine. Now people won't find the same offsets and such over and over again.

But at least, make accounts required (with e-mail confirmation) or something. I don't want people to clutter in the ROM hacking wiki.
Cellar Dweller

Flurry
!!!
Level: 27

Posts: 131/269
EXP: 107817
For next: 8342

Since: 03-15-04
From: Arkansas

Since last post: 16 days
Last activity: 34 min.
Posted on 09-02-04 04:00 PM Link | Quote
I think that a wiki great idea. Just make sure that it has a rollback function and a good change tracking system.

What I don't like is the general paranoia and stinginess expressed in some of the other posts in this thread. A new piece of information or a new technique can only be used improve a few hacks if it is kept private, but if it is made public, many hacks can be improved. I consider favoring the former to be stupid and contemptible.
Gavin

Fuzzy
Rhinoceruses don't play games. They fucking charge your ass.
Level: 43

Posts: 152/799
EXP: 551711
For next: 13335

Since: 03-15-04
From: IL, USA

Since last post: 13 hours
Last activity: 13 hours
Posted on 09-02-04 04:42 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Cellar Dweller
I think that a wiki great idea. Just make sure that it has a rollback function and a good change tracking system.

What I don't like is the general paranoia and stinginess expressed in some of the other posts in this thread. A new piece of information or a new technique can only be used improve a few hacks if it is kept private, but if it is made public, many hacks can be improved. I consider favoring the former to be stupid and contemptible.


definetly agreed.
dan

Snap Dragon
Level: 43

Posts: 149/782
EXP: 534516
For next: 30530

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 20 hours
Last activity: 14 hours
Posted on 09-03-04 12:19 AM Link | Quote
Sharing information is the only way for the ROM hacking community to grow. Sad fact is, the majority of people do not seem to realise this fact.
HyperLamer
<||bass> and this was the soloution i thought of that was guarinteed to piss off the greatest amount of people

Sesshomaru
Tamaranian

Level: 118

Posts: 1491/8210
EXP: 18171887
For next: 211027

Since: 03-15-04
From: Canada, w00t!
LOL FAD

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 09-03-04 01:07 AM Link | Quote
Indeed, the thing that I hate most about ROM hacking is people who refuse to share their findings. If some tard doesn't give you credit for your ideas, that's their problem and you can take care of it accordingly.
Cellar Dweller

Flurry
!!!
Level: 27

Posts: 132/269
EXP: 107817
For next: 8342

Since: 03-15-04
From: Arkansas

Since last post: 16 days
Last activity: 34 min.
Posted on 09-04-04 08:47 AM Link | Quote
We're not the first ones to come up with the idea of a ROM hacking wiki. There was a discussion on the romhacking.com forums last spring and a test wiki was set up. According to the linked page the database could be moved to a better server if people started using it. Perhaps it would be a good idea to see if that wiki is still worth posting to.

On the other hand, an installation of MediaWiki would provide better service than just about any other wiki software.
bbitmaster

Koopa
Level: 18

Posts: 18/103
EXP: 25264
For next: 4633

Since: 03-28-04
From: Knoxville, tTN

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 7 days
Posted on 09-05-04 09:44 PM Link | Quote
Actually, I really think this is a great idea. There are a lot of games that people probably have data and memory locations stashed away for. I personally have a lot of stuff buried away for a few games I was working on. Its almost sad that if someone posts a thread like "Anyone have any information for game x" there may be a good chance someone else will respond with something stashed away that no-one knew about before. A Wiki would allow for everyone to add their own stuff to a central location for everyone to go to. Not a bad idea at all.

I really don't understand what is up with alot of people's additude about not sharing or what they found out. It only hurts everyone. I know of and even have several very awesome utilities for a few games which were abandoned by their authors, and I'm not even supposed to mention anything about them. I'm talking really good stuff like a music editor, and a level editor for a snes games that would make everyone here go, woah! Of course, I respect the authors' wishes even (leaking isn't cool!) though I don't agree with it because I believe everyone should share everything, especially if it was abandoned.

This community should be about sharing everything. This is why any editor or utlity I make is going to be open source (unless I'm really embarrassed about the source for some reason). Which reminds me, I really need to do something with that neptune editor.



(edited by bbitmaster on 09-05-04 12:58 PM)
dan

Snap Dragon
Level: 43

Posts: 162/782
EXP: 534516
For next: 30530

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 20 hours
Last activity: 14 hours
Posted on 09-06-04 12:35 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by bbitmaster
Actually, I really think this is a great idea. There are a lot of games that people probably have data and memory locations stashed away for. I personally have a lot of stuff buried away for a few games I was working on. Its almost sad that if someone posts a thread like "Anyone have any information for game x" there may be a good chance someone else will respond with something stashed away that no-one knew about before. A Wiki would allow for everyone to add their own stuff to a central location for everyone to go to. Not a bad idea at all.


Yep, I have a few bits of data for games that I've just stopped hacking, and putting them in a central location would enable someone to use the data that I've found.
Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Rom Hacking - Rom hacking Wiki? | |


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.020 seconds.