 |
| Register | Login | |||||
 |
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| ACS
| Commons
| Calendar
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat |
|
| | ||
|
| Register | Login | |||||
|
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| ACS
| Commons
| Calendar
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat |
|
| | ||
| 0 user currently in Sports Center. |
| Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Sports Center - Poor Smarty Jones! |
 |  |  |
| Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
| User | Post | ||
KirbysKitten213 Hammer Level: 6  Posts: 4/11 EXP: 887 For next: 20 Since: 03-20-04 From: Ontario, CA Since last post: 450 days Last activity: 339 days |
| ||
It happened again! a FRESH HORSE, that skipped the Preakness went to race in the Belmont to upset another Triple Crown hopeful. There is not going to be a Triple Crown winner until they change the rules! Grr!! I Love Smarty Jones!!  Is anyone else upset about this? |
|||
JJ64 Boo Level: 45 Posts: 145/919 EXP: 640956 For next: 19208 Since: 05-22-04 From: Green Bay, WI Since last post: 441 days Last activity: 269 days |
| ||
| What rule needs to be changed? | |||
|
KirbysKitten213 Hammer Level: 6 Posts: 8/11 EXP: 887 For next: 20 Since: 03-20-04 From: Ontario, CA Since last post: 450 days Last activity: 339 days |
| ||
| The rule that it's ok for horses to not have to run in all legs of the Triple Crown. Because, what has happened every year, is that a horse will run in the Derby, skip the Preakness, and win the Belmont, because they are rested. But, the problem with that is, they always beat the T.C. hopeful, because, of course, you have to run in all three races to win the Triple Crown. And it is completely unfair to have a Fresh Horse beat them! So, what I'm saying is that they need to make a rule that horses that are going to run in the Belmont are required to run all three races: the Derby, the Preakness, and the Belmont. |
|||
|
JJ64 Boo Level: 45 Posts: 146/919 EXP: 640956 For next: 19208 Since: 05-22-04 From: Green Bay, WI Since last post: 441 days Last activity: 269 days |
| ||
| That is pretty unfair. | |||
|
KirbysKitten213 Hammer Level: 6 Posts: 9/11 EXP: 887 For next: 20 Since: 03-20-04 From: Ontario, CA Since last post: 450 days Last activity: 339 days |
| ||
| Which part is unfair?? The current rules? or the rules I suggested? | |||
|
JJ64 Boo Level: 45 Posts: 152/919 EXP: 640956 For next: 19208 Since: 05-22-04 From: Green Bay, WI Since last post: 441 days Last activity: 269 days |
| ||
| Which part is unfair?? The current rules? or the rules I suggested? The current rules. |
|||
|
KirbysKitten213 Hammer Level: 6 Posts: 11/11 EXP: 887 For next: 20 Since: 03-20-04 From: Ontario, CA Since last post: 450 days Last activity: 339 days |
| ||
| Yes, they definitely are! I really hope they change them. | |||
|
Colleen Administrator Level: 136 Posts: 1820/11302 EXP: 29369328 For next: 727587 Since: 03-15-04 From: LaSalle, Quebec, Canada Since last post: 3 hours Last activity: 1 hour |
| ||
Maybe if the Belmont wasn't the longest and most grueling race of the three...  I think we're still due another TC winner and it'll happen, but I still think that other house was on steroids.  |
|||
Kirby PopStar Bloober Level: 33  Posts: 109/431 EXP: 218655 For next: 10524 Since: 03-15-04 From: Santa Clarita, CA Since last post: 27 days Last activity: 19 days |
| ||
I was totally thinking that after the race!  "I bet that other horse was on steroids, nobody beats Smarty Jones!  " |
| Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
| Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Sports Center - Poor Smarty Jones! |
| | |
