Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
0 user currently in Suggestions/Bug Reports.
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Suggestions/Bug Reports - Can someone explain why target=_top is added to <a> tags? | | Thread closed
Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
FreeDOS

Lava Lotus
Wannabe-Mod :<
Level: 59

Posts: 477/1657
EXP: 1648646
For next: 24482

Since: 03-15-04
From: Seattle

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 06-04-04 08:42 PM Link
I'm rather curious, and there doesn't seem to be any sense behind it... maybe there is.
Emptyeye
I am a real American!
Real American
Level: 67

Posts: 129/2273
EXP: 2488421
For next: 104451

Since: 05-24-04
From: I DUNNOOOOOOOO!!

Since last post: 9 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 06-04-04 09:04 PM Link
There is.

The "target" attribute specifies which window you want the link to open in (Hence "target=blank" will open it in a new window). "Top" is whatever happens to be the top window at the time, so it's telling it to open the link in the current window.
Cymoro
PATRICK DUFFY WILL LASER YOUR SOUL


Level: 67

Posts: 609/2216
EXP: 2549743
For next: 43129

Since: 03-15-04
From: Cymoro Gaming

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 06-04-04 10:54 PM Link
Originally posted by Emptyeye
There is.

The "target" attribute specifies which window you want the link to open in (Hence "target=blank" will open it in a new window). "Top" is whatever happens to be the top window at the time, so it's telling it to open the link in the current window.


I would like to mention something:

To the people who have target=blank in your layouts: It's fucking ANNOYING. That goes to NeoTransOtaku and Kon-Tiki. And any others.
Modereb

Paragoomba
Level: 15

Posts: 6/75
EXP: 14749
For next: 1635

Since: 06-04-04

Since last post: 350 days
Last activity: 339 days
Posted on 06-04-04 11:43 PM Link
I'm perfectly aware of what the target attribute does.

However, I don't see a point in why this forum is using it either. Now, if it was for opening a new window, or when using a frame layout, I'd say the target attribute is unmissable. But in this case...
Acmlm

Torosu
heh
Level: 51

Posts: 683/1173
EXP: 981994
For next: 31944

Since: 03-15-04
From: Somewhere that isn't outside of Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

Since last post: 39 days
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 06-05-04 08:42 AM Link
target=_top? Added to what from where? I don't remember ever adding that in the board code It's not in my layout, it's not added by [url], it's not in function.php, so ...


Or do you just mean <a> tags in general?


(edited by Acmlm on 06-04-04 11:42 PM)
neotransotaku

Baby Mario
戻れたら、
誰も気が付く
Level: 87

Posts: 663/4016
EXP: 6220548
For next: 172226

Since: 03-15-04
From: Outside of Time/Space

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 06-05-04 10:21 AM Link
Originally posted by Cymoro
To the people who have target=blank in your layouts: It's fucking ANNOYING. That goes to NeoTransOtaku and Kon-Tiki. And any others.


i unfortunately do not have broadband...which means I find it cumbersome to click on a link in a thread only to have to wait another minute or two to get back to the same thread again after clicking the link. i put it in because not many people know what holding shift does when clicking a link
FreeDOS

Lava Lotus
Wannabe-Mod :<
Level: 59

Posts: 478/1657
EXP: 1648646
For next: 24482

Since: 03-15-04
From: Seattle

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 06-05-04 12:55 PM Link
This link was created without a target attribute. It should have one after posting. This is what I am asking, why?

Originally posted by neotransotaku
Originally posted by Cymoro
To the people who have target=blank in your layouts: It's fucking ANNOYING. That goes to NeoTransOtaku and Kon-Tiki. And any others.


i unfortunately do not have broadband...which means I find it cumbersome to click on a link in a thread only to have to wait another minute or two to get back to the same thread again after clicking the link. i put it in because not many people know what holding shift does when clicking a link


  1. Use a browser that caches everything.
  2. Middle-click to open a new tab, or right-click to do that or new window.

Geez. I hate target="_blank" tags, too. They are just annoying. I like the functionality of back and foreward just fine, thank you.



EDIT: OK, there isn't... but it used to do it only a couple days ago.


(edited by FreeDOS on 06-05-04 03:56 AM)
neotransotaku

Baby Mario
戻れたら、
誰も気が付く
Level: 87

Posts: 667/4016
EXP: 6220548
For next: 172226

Since: 03-15-04
From: Outside of Time/Space

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 06-05-04 01:13 PM Link
Originally posted by FreeDOS
  1. Use a browser that caches everything.
  2. Middle-click to open a new tab, or right-click to do that or new window.

Geez. I hate target="_blank" tags, too. They are just annoying. I like the functionality of back and foreward just fine, thank you.


1. um...IE and Mozilla are set to cache pages (what browser doesn't?) and I still get lag

2. I click middle button (mouse wheel) and I get the auto-scroll feature by microsoft

well...i don't post links that much anyways, so I'll continue to use target until it is banned by the board or board majority says doing such a thing will have penalty similar to spamming
Kitten Yiffer

Purple wand
Furry moderator
Vivent l'exp����¯�¿�½������©rience de signalisation d'amusement, ou bien !
Level: 135

Posts: 2089/11162
EXP: 28824106
For next: 510899

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 4 min.
Posted on 06-05-04 02:57 PM Link
Or maybe he talks about Firefox, which have a better cache system.

Mozilla Firefox and plain Mozilla is diffrent, I know I tried both.

I hadn't noticed target="_blank" in Firefox. It dosen't appear at all...
Acmlm

Torosu
heh
Level: 51

Posts: 686/1173
EXP: 981994
For next: 31944

Since: 03-15-04
From: Somewhere that isn't outside of Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

Since last post: 39 days
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 06-05-04 08:36 PM Link
I've gotten used to shift-click as well ... that's how it's done in Internet Explorer

Mine also likes to randomly reload pages when I do Back, even when it doesn't need to (and when I don't want it to) ... and yes, cache is enabled
FreeDOS

Lava Lotus
Wannabe-Mod :<
Level: 59

Posts: 481/1657
EXP: 1648646
For next: 24482

Since: 03-15-04
From: Seattle

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 06-06-04 12:46 AM Link
Shift-click in Firefox opens a new tab. I like middle-clicking links to do that, though. (Middle clicking on anything but a link brings up auto-scroll)

Firefox caches things like Flash animations and images... Internet Explorer only caches HTML.

Kitten Yiffer: Do you happen to have Tabbar Extensions? You can actually change the behaviour of the special target names with it.
neotransotaku

Baby Mario
戻れたら、
誰も気が付く
Level: 87

Posts: 673/4016
EXP: 6220548
For next: 172226

Since: 03-15-04
From: Outside of Time/Space

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 06-06-04 12:11 PM Link
Originally posted by FreeDOS
Internet Explorer only caches HTML.


I just checked my Temporary Internet Files folder...I see .jpg and .gif files in there

anyways, I think no browser has a perfect cache system...or maybe the "always check for new updated copy" always downloads the file again...
FreeDOS

Lava Lotus
Wannabe-Mod :<
Level: 59

Posts: 485/1657
EXP: 1648646
For next: 24482

Since: 03-15-04
From: Seattle

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 06-06-04 10:09 PM Link
Well... last time I checked it always reloads images every time you go to a page...

Maybe it caches images, but doesn't used the cached files. Why it would do that, I don't know.
Acmlm

Torosu
heh
Level: 51

Posts: 707/1173
EXP: 981994
For next: 31944

Since: 03-15-04
From: Somewhere that isn't outside of Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

Since last post: 39 days
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 06-06-04 10:22 PM Link
Oh, it certainly caches them (and not only images, Temporary Internet Files has files of various types) ... a good example of this is with sites that don't allow outside linking

View the page, see [x], go to the URL manually, see the image, go back, the image is still there ... reload and it's gone ...
FreeDOS

Lava Lotus
Wannabe-Mod :<
Level: 59

Posts: 487/1657
EXP: 1648646
For next: 24482

Since: 03-15-04
From: Seattle

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 06-06-04 10:38 PM Link
Firefox doesn't reload images on refresh, unless one of three things:
1. You press CTRL+F5. That ignores the cache altogether.
2. The site told it not to. (Using Header-cache: none)
3. You disabled the cache.

Anyway... This thread has served its purpose and should be closed. If anyone wants to continue talking about how browsers work, they can make a new thread
Acmlm

Torosu
heh
Level: 51

Posts: 709/1173
EXP: 981994
For next: 31944

Since: 03-15-04
From: Somewhere that isn't outside of Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

Since last post: 39 days
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 06-06-04 10:41 PM Link
Yeah, Ctrl-F5, that's in Internet Explorer too

But ok ... *closes*
Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Suggestions/Bug Reports - Can someone explain why target=_top is added to <a> tags? | | Thread closed


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.017 seconds.