Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
2 users currently in General Chat: Ailure, Dark Vampriel | 1 guest
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - General Chat - Survey: The Atomic Bomb | |
Pages: 1 2 3 4Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Was dropping 2 atomic bombs on Japan in 1945 justifiable?
Answer honestly, and if you wish, support your answer in a post
Yes
 
46.8%, 22 votes
No
 
42.6%, 20 votes
No decision
 
10.6%, 5 votes
Multi-voting is disabled.

User Post
kitty
Come on babe, pet the pussy ;)
Level: 70

Posts: 1092/2449
EXP: 2962406
For next: 53405

Since: 03-15-04
From: Scranton, PA, USA

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 05-19-04 03:27 PM Link | Quote
Well, it's the Principle of Double Effect:
The US dropped two bombs (killing a lot of people) to end the war.

In ethical examinations, NOTHING which has a negative first action/consequence (killing of people) can ever be ethical, no matter what the outcome (ending the war).

It's a very stupid way of examining it in my humble opinion, but it's the way that nearly everyone who is considered ethical (The Vatican, most notably) examines the ethics of actions today. I think it's bad because you have situations where you cannot say which is the first actual intended action, and it's really a judgement call, but that's why it's the least flawless (used in conjunction with Prudential Personalism) and not perfect (no ethical measurement will probably ever be, because they must all be devoid of religious influences, etc)...

If the bombs weren't dropped, the war would not have ended without FAR more US and Japanese, as well as Chinese, Russian, Canadian, and British casualties (As well as many other pacific islands, and Austrailia too, as it's without doubt, in my mind, that if Japan were beginning to lose very badly, they would have done a few very damaging kamikaze attacks on Austrailia, just to hurt them before losing the war).


(edited by Yiffy Kitten on 05-19-04 06:29 AM)
Kitten Yiffer

Purple wand
Furry moderator
Vivent l'exp����¯�¿�½������©rience de signalisation d'amusement, ou bien !
Level: 135

Posts: 1782/11162
EXP: 28824106
For next: 510899

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 4 min.
Posted on 05-19-04 06:59 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Toxic
If a country used one today, odds are a global war would erupt with the massive launching of missles back and forth, destroying most of the population.
I think it depends on which country that uses the a-bomb, and which country that is getting attacked.

But if US uses A-bombs again today. Well... let say that the world opinion about them will decrease by alot.

We can discuss this what would happen if we didn't drop the bombs forever. How would the world been today if hitler didn't exist? (there probably would have been other big war instead... heh)

If they wasn't used in the WWII. They sure would have been used later...
Fyxe

Lyn
Level: 51

Posts: 192/1160
EXP: 954265
For next: 59673

Since: 03-29-04

Since last post: 117 days
Last activity: 114 days
Posted on 05-19-04 10:15 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Weasel
I think the bombs proved to the world:

1) The reality of the destructive force we had
2) The fact that we had more than one, so we could do this kind of damage again.

Without a doubt, I think it was right to drop both bombs. It further shows the U.S. as a leading military power, and it gave the world second thoughts on using their own weapons like this.


That's frightening. You justify killing thousands and thousands of civilians because 'it shows the US as a leading military power'.

There are many ways to justify using the atomic bomb (although not all of the justifications are sound, of course), but I shall not take any stance on this as I do not know enough history about what happened. However, I will say that that is possibly the worst and most frightening justification I've ever heard.

You could of shown the military power by just... Bombing anything. The open ocean would of been enough. In fact, I think America could of made Japan surrender via the atomic bomb without killing *anyone*, as long as they showed them what they COULD do.

They certainly didn't have to drop two on some civilian targets. Two... It's just insane..

You can't say that if the bombs were not dropped, the war would of counted up far more overall deaths. You can't. You do not know that. Nobody knows that. You can take a guess, but...

EDIT: Weasel, you also suggest that it's ok for America to nuke things, but not ok for any other countries to use them if they got their hands on them. Za?


(edited by Fyxe on 05-19-04 01:17 PM)
Waddler-D

Deddorokku
Level: 33

Posts: 91/442
EXP: 227132
For next: 2047

Since: 03-15-04
From: Orange Ocean, Popstar

Since last post: 168 days
Last activity: 123 days
Posted on 05-20-04 12:35 AM Link | Quote
Fyxe, you do have a point there. Basically the reasons why the Axis were defeated was because Germany, Italy and Japan at that time were becoming a leading military threat, as all they were doing is preparing for something. I think that's probably why quite a few countries hate the United States because the fact that we are a leading military power means that we can easily become a leading military threat.

Though not to be off topic, while the bombs did made it so that the war stopped much sooner than expected. I'm pretty sure there was some calculation to this, Fyxe. Still, I get what you mean, as the calculations with the randomness of a bomb is not something that can't be put on paper. As what I have heard from the Chemistry paper, only 2% of the uranium in those bombs went off, the rest was just radiated in the place.

Still though, I really don't think an atomic bomb is the best answer to something. It's not only destructive to buildings and people, but it's also environmentally destructive with the radiation. I'm pretty sure this affected more than just the civilians but nature itself was probably disturbed because of this. That's what I didn't like about it, as it's basically like an explosive AND chemical weapon almost.

I just hate the idea of weapons of mass destruction, really. We should be more concerned with STOPPING stuff like this from happening and not promoting it...
Kefka
Indefinitely Unbanned
Level: 81

Posts: 1998/3392
EXP: 4826208
For next: 166641

Since: 03-15-04
From: Pomona, CALIFORNIA BABY!

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 05-20-04 12:39 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Waddler-D
Fyxe, you do have a point there. Basically the reasons why the Axis were defeated was because Germany, Italy and Japan at that time were becoming a leading military threat, as all they were doing is preparing for something. I think that's probably why quite a few countries hate the United States because the fact that we are a leading military power means that we can easily become a leading military threat.




Actually, the reason why many countries hate us is because we are an imperializing country. We essentially occupy other countries and take them over indirectly, and sometimes even directly. You want proof? Look at Latin/South America in the last century. Now, I read the rest of your post also, but I just thought I'd point out why many countries do hate us.
Waddler-D

Deddorokku
Level: 33

Posts: 92/442
EXP: 227132
For next: 2047

Since: 03-15-04
From: Orange Ocean, Popstar

Since last post: 168 days
Last activity: 123 days
Posted on 05-20-04 12:44 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Kefka
Originally posted by Waddler-D
Fyxe, you do have a point there. Basically the reasons why the Axis were defeated was because Germany, Italy and Japan at that time were becoming a leading military threat, as all they were doing is preparing for something. I think that's probably why quite a few countries hate the United States because the fact that we are a leading military power means that we can easily become a leading military threat.




Actually, the reason why many countries hate us is because we are an imperializing country. We essentially occupy other countries and take them over indirectly, and sometimes even directly. You want proof? Look at Latin/South America in the last century. Now, I read the rest of your post also, but I just thought I'd point out why many countries do hate us.


Well, yeah... You are right about that, Kefka. We tend to be that way and it's definitely not the right thing to do. I mean, it's not essentially bad to check up on our neighbors, but taking countries over indirectly... I get what you're saying. Still, that was just one of my other assumption on why they hate us.
Kefka
Indefinitely Unbanned
Level: 81

Posts: 1999/3392
EXP: 4826208
For next: 166641

Since: 03-15-04
From: Pomona, CALIFORNIA BABY!

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 05-20-04 12:46 AM Link | Quote
Oh, and off topic, but another bit of proof is... IRAQ! Yep, we're just takin it over!

Back on topic, thanks to all who have voted so far, this will be interesting for this piece of the U.S. History thing...
DarkSlaya
POOOOOOOOOOOORN!
Level: 88

Posts: 58/4249
EXP: 6409254
For next: 241410

Since: 05-16-04
From: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Since last post: 8 hours
Last activity: 5 hours
Posted on 05-20-04 12:47 AM Link | Quote
Hell no. Droping a bomb wasn't justifiable at all. I mean, there are still radiations of this. Humans should've never found out about how to manipulate uranium.
Kefka
Indefinitely Unbanned
Level: 81

Posts: 2000/3392
EXP: 4826208
For next: 166641

Since: 03-15-04
From: Pomona, CALIFORNIA BABY!

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 05-20-04 12:49 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by DarkSlaya
Hell no. Droping a bomb wasn't justifiable at all. I mean, there are still radiations of this. Humans should've never found out about how to manipulate uranium.


Well, we use radiation for many other things, including health issues, you know. I wouldn't be so quick to say that we shouldn't have ever learned to do that.

EDIT: w00tage! The bi-millenial mark! And I didn't even have to break a sweat!


(edited by Kefka on 05-19-04 03:49 PM)
Silvershield

Slime
Level: 30

Posts: 189/345
EXP: 153029
For next: 12840

Since: 04-11-04
From: New Jersey

Since last post: 60 days
Last activity: 6 hours
Posted on 05-20-04 01:06 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by NetSplit
As for dropping the bombs being used as justification for saving the lives of soldiers who would be sent to invade Japan (had the invasion actually had to have taken place), the estimates for the death toll that would result from said invasion were, to the best of my recollection, around 65,000 people, displaying the idea of 'Well, it's better that they lose 100,000 people than we lose 60,000 people.' The estimates were distorted over time to better justify the dropping of the bombs, ranging from 250,000 American lives to even an entire million soldiers, but they were just that - distortions made to better justify the attack.
In response the the text which I've put emphasis on, that's how war is, NetSplit! It is our strategic and moral responsibility to preserve the lives of our own, just as every other nation holds that same duty. If Japanese leaders had considered the lives of their citizens instead of their own inflated sense of pride, maybe the bombs never would have been dropped!
knuck

Hinox
Banned until 19-58-5815: trolling, flaming, spamming, being a general fucktard...
Level: 62

Posts: 285/1818
EXP: 1894574
For next: 90112

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 14 hours
Last activity: 9 hours
Posted on 05-20-04 01:33 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Silvershield
In response the the text which I've put emphasis on, that's how war is, NetSplit! It is our strategic and moral responsibility to preserve the lives of our own, just as every other nation holds that same duty. If Japanese leaders had considered the lives of their citizens instead of their own inflated sense of pride, maybe the bombs never would have been dropped!

You say that because you are american. The way you, Weasel and a few people talk it sounds like US is the ruler of the world and everyone should follow what they want.
I doubt that if someone dropped 2 atomic bombs in New York you would be saying "that's how war is".
Silvershield

Slime
Level: 30

Posts: 193/345
EXP: 153029
For next: 12840

Since: 04-11-04
From: New Jersey

Since last post: 60 days
Last activity: 6 hours
Posted on 05-20-04 01:40 AM Link | Quote
If an atomic attack on the United States was assured, imminent, and undefendable, I am quite positive that United States leaders would not be too arrogant and proud to refuse surrender if the tradeoff was the preservation of hundreds of thousands of civilian lives.


(edited by Silvershield on 05-19-04 05:59 PM)
neotransotaku

Baby Mario
戻れたら、
誰も気が付く
Level: 87

Posts: 614/4016
EXP: 6220548
For next: 172226

Since: 03-15-04
From: Outside of Time/Space

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 05-20-04 02:57 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Silvershield
If an atomic attack on the United States was assured, imminenet, and undefendable, I am quite positive that United States leaders would not be too arrogant and proud to refuse surrender if the tradeoff was the preservation of hundreds of thousands of civilian lives.


um...no...because the american people will cry for justice and we have an afghanistan all over again...but this time, we have world war III
Silvershield

Slime
Level: 30

Posts: 196/345
EXP: 153029
For next: 12840

Since: 04-11-04
From: New Jersey

Since last post: 60 days
Last activity: 6 hours
Posted on 05-20-04 03:04 AM Link | Quote
neotransotaku, what I'm saying is that, if the United States and Japan had been switched in terms of who possessed the a-bomb, a ridiculous "Samurai code of honor" would not have taken precedence over hundreds of thousands of civilian casualties. Abandon any notions of subsequent revenge and whatnot; I'm trying to emphasize Japan's absurd idea that a massive life-saving concession is completely dishonorable.
neotransotaku

Baby Mario
戻れたら、
誰も気が付く
Level: 87

Posts: 617/4016
EXP: 6220548
For next: 172226

Since: 03-15-04
From: Outside of Time/Space

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 05-20-04 03:56 AM Link | Quote
i see...it seems i didn't see the 45th-49th posts...otherwise, i would probably have made a different comment

as for deeper what ifs...all we can do is only speculate and see what the will of the person calling the shots would have done.
Kefka
Indefinitely Unbanned
Level: 81

Posts: 2011/3392
EXP: 4826208
For next: 166641

Since: 03-15-04
From: Pomona, CALIFORNIA BABY!

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 05-20-04 04:03 AM Link | Quote
Well, Harry Truman essentially made the decisions himself, so unless he asked for the opinions of others to help decide, it's pretty safe to assume that there couldn't have been any other way for things to turn out.
alte Hexe

Star Mario
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
"But Joe you're ten years dead!"
"I never died" said he
"I never died!" said he
Level: 99

Posts: 648/5458
EXP: 9854489
For next: 145511

Since: 03-15-04
From: ...

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 05-20-04 04:19 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Silvershield
If an atomic attack on the United States was assured, imminent, and undefendable, I am quite positive that United States leaders would not be too arrogant and proud to refuse surrender if the tradeoff was the preservation of hundreds of thousands of civilian lives.


Japan didn't know that a little atom splitting would be going on that day.
DarkSlaya
POOOOOOOOOOOORN!
Level: 88

Posts: 76/4249
EXP: 6409254
For next: 241410

Since: 05-16-04
From: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Since last post: 8 hours
Last activity: 5 hours
Posted on 05-20-04 04:43 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Kefka
Originally posted by DarkSlaya
Hell no. Droping a bomb wasn't justifiable at all. I mean, there are still radiations of this. Humans should've never found out about how to manipulate uranium.

Well, we use radiation for many other things, including health issues, you know. I wouldn't be so quick to say that we shouldn't have ever learned to do that.


But It killed alot of people. And I shall change what I said: We should'Ve not learned to use it in bombs!
alte Hexe

Star Mario
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
"But Joe you're ten years dead!"
"I never died" said he
"I never died!" said he
Level: 99

Posts: 652/5458
EXP: 9854489
For next: 145511

Since: 03-15-04
From: ...

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 05-20-04 04:49 AM Link | Quote
The bomb is what gave us the ability to do most of what we do in this world.

Nuclear power, deep space probes, radiological medicine, radiological pasturization
Silvershield

Slime
Level: 30

Posts: 202/345
EXP: 153029
For next: 12840

Since: 04-11-04
From: New Jersey

Since last post: 60 days
Last activity: 6 hours
Posted on 05-20-04 06:42 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by EvillerLegion
Japan didn't know that a little atom splitting would be going on that day.
Even after we'd bombed them once, they had no idea? Surely, if they took our second warning as a bluff, that is quite a tremendous bluff to ignore!
Pages: 1 2 3 4Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - General Chat - Survey: The Atomic Bomb | |


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.020 seconds.