Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
2 users currently in General Chat: Ailure, Dark Vampriel | 1 guest
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - General Chat - Google downloaded the internet. | |
Pages: 1 2 3Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
HyperLamer
<||bass> and this was the soloution i thought of that was guarinteed to piss off the greatest amount of people

Sesshomaru
Tamaranian

Level: 118

Posts: 4394/8210
EXP: 18171887
For next: 211027

Since: 03-15-04
From: Canada, w00t!
LOL FAD

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 05-08-05 01:23 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by GRAVITEH
Originally posted by R2H2
They're planning to back up the entire internet? Yeah, they've flipped.


psst.. it's a satirical article

I kinda figured that much. Can't a guy play along?
Kitten Yiffer

Purple wand
Furry moderator
Vivent l'exp����¯�¿�½������©rience de signalisation d'amusement, ou bien !
Level: 135

Posts: 9603/11162
EXP: 28824106
For next: 510899

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 4 min.
Posted on 05-08-05 02:26 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Kagome
Originally posted by Kitty Jedi
I think it's more of an oversight from google's part than anything else. :/

...I gotta check out that thing thought.
You are aware that your private messages on forums etc are going to be pratically public domain, right?
Did you honestly belive that I was going to be logged in while I was surfing with tha thing eh?

I better create an alternate profile just for that thing...
DarkSlaya
POOOOOOOOOOOORN!
Level: 88

Posts: 3638/4249
EXP: 6409254
For next: 241410

Since: 05-16-04
From: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Since last post: 8 hours
Last activity: 5 hours
Posted on 05-08-05 03:53 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Kagome
Originally posted by Kitty Jedi
I think it's more of an oversight from google's part than anything else. :/

...I gotta check out that thing thought.
You are aware that your private messages on forums etc are going to be pratically public domain, right?


Nope, that's not it.

Unless someone knew the exact url of a certain PM, they won't get to see them (the "logged in as someone else" thing is basicly just a cached version of the page on which you're logged in. The person isn't exactly logged in as you ... blah...blah....blah)
Graviteh

Level: 31

Posts: 172/500
EXP: 165989
For next: 19374

Since: 03-27-05
From: The Internet

Since last post: 42 days
Last activity: 1 day
Posted on 05-08-05 05:39 PM Link | Quote
wait, what would happen to our free software? If we search for something on the googlenet, then we are just goin to be bombarded with irrelevant results.
Sketchie

Mole
Level: 28

Posts: 287/356
EXP: 118351
For next: 12987

Since: 12-27-04

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 10 hours
Posted on 05-09-05 10:06 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Kyouji Craw
To everyone saying they can't get to all the internet: You don't get it. They take the data from pages people go to if they're not already on their server and put it up. If someone's gone there with Google Accelerator, they have a copy of that page.


...WTF?

Does that mean if I fill in my credit card info on Amazon.com for example using Google Accelerator, other people can see my credit card info? Is that what you're saying??
Alastor the Stylish
Hey! I made a cool game! It's called "I poisoned half the food, so if you eat you might die!" Have a taco.


Level: 114

Posts: 6419/7620
EXP: 16258468
For next: 51099

Since: 03-15-04
From: Oregon, US

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 05-09-05 11:53 AM Link | Quote
Having never bought off of Amazon I can't say, but as long as they don't display the credit card information after you enter it, most likely not.
windwaker

Ball and Chain Trooper
WHY ALL THE MAYONNAISE HATE
Level: 61

Posts: 1534/1797
EXP: 1860597
For next: 15999

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 6 days
Posted on 05-10-05 06:32 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Graviteh
Well, Every word would have a Google image beside it, then our icons will all turn into Gs. Our next browser would have to be the WGC Standard complain GoogleFox web browser


You're lame, go die somewhere.

So you can find all of these cached pages through Google, interesting. XD
Colleen
Administrator
Level: 136

Posts: 8189/11302
EXP: 29369328
For next: 727587

Since: 03-15-04
From: LaSalle, Quebec, Canada

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 05-11-05 12:23 AM Link | Quote
Lots of searches cache web pages. :\ I'd go with satire here, although IF you ended up logged in as someone else on a message board... that's not Google's problem.

I doubt it saves form data.
HyperLamer
<||bass> and this was the soloution i thought of that was guarinteed to piss off the greatest amount of people

Sesshomaru
Tamaranian

Level: 118

Posts: 4421/8210
EXP: 18171887
For next: 211027

Since: 03-15-04
From: Canada, w00t!
LOL FAD

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 05-11-05 12:42 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Kyouji Craw
Having never bought off of Amazon I can't say, but as long as they don't display the credit card information after you enter it, most likely not.

Amazon most likely uses a secure connection (https) for that. It doesn't cache those.
Peardian

Lava Lotus
The Uncanny Mario Art Master
KvSG #87 is up!
No Trouter yet...

Halloween's over... Turkey time!
Level: 58

Posts: 720/1696
EXP: 1545376
For next: 32170

Since: 07-01-04
From: before 3:00 - school, after 3:00 - Pearl Island

Since last post: 7 hours
Last activity: 6 hours
Posted on 05-11-05 06:53 AM Link | Quote
This thread's title reminded me of something...



I say downloading the internet would be silly. Also impossible (and illogical).
Banedon

Giant Red Paratroopa
Level: 55

Posts: 1161/1408
EXP: 1291380
For next: 22809

Since: 03-15-04
From: Michigan

Since last post: 101 days
Last activity: 90 days
Posted on 05-12-05 02:28 AM Link | Quote
I wonder how much total information Google has cached by now...and how many rooms full of hard drives it would take to store it all.
Slay

Level: 25

Posts: 43/339
EXP: 85592
For next: 4028

Since: 04-28-05
From: Threshold Between Heaven and Hell

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
Posted on 05-12-05 10:57 AM Link | Quote
We should continually create blank freesites (Geocities, Angelfire) just to delay their process that much more.

Edit Follows...
On a more serious note, it is unfeasable with our current technology to "download the internet." I've heard from the Discovery Channel that each year, two terrabytes of information are created worldwide, and uploaded to the internet. But of course, it doesn't happen all at once. It's not as if 2TB suddenly appears, and they're given a year to catch up. Thousands of megabytes are created every few seconds, I could imagine. I'm not good with math; if 2TB are created a year, how much information is that per second?


(edited by Slay on 05-12-05 10:48 PM)
Jill
In love with a dream..
Level: 36

Posts: 460/528
EXP: 296548
For next: 11562

Since: 03-15-04
From: Teh Sweden

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 14 hours
Posted on 05-14-05 12:05 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Kefka
Yea, that's awesome. If I could do the same, I would have a LONG time ago.

And you still wouldn't be done downloading to this day...
HyperLamer
<||bass> and this was the soloution i thought of that was guarinteed to piss off the greatest amount of people

Sesshomaru
Tamaranian

Level: 118

Posts: 4455/8210
EXP: 18171887
For next: 211027

Since: 03-15-04
From: Canada, w00t!
LOL FAD

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 05-14-05 12:51 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Slay
if 2TB are created a year, how much information is that per second?

Something like 35K.
Slay

Level: 25

Posts: 46/339
EXP: 85592
For next: 4028

Since: 04-28-05
From: Threshold Between Heaven and Hell

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
Posted on 05-14-05 05:47 AM Link | Quote
Hmm, that doesn't seem like much. I bothered to do the caculation and it turns out to be 34865.2850001902587519026 bytes per second. The probability of a computer sustaining 35k per second is likely, but not for a full year. Most Windows and Mac-based computers shut down after a month or so of being left on. Add the stress of the constant download (it can't waver below 35k per second or it fails) and it does seem quite impossible with our current technology. Not to mention that it takes time to search for the new information, and with the current advent of bloggers, there's simply no way, the information is created too sporadically.
windwaker

Ball and Chain Trooper
WHY ALL THE MAYONNAISE HATE
Level: 61

Posts: 1543/1797
EXP: 1860597
For next: 15999

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 6 days
Posted on 05-14-05 06:58 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Banedon
I wonder how much total information Google has cached by now...and how many rooms full of hard drives it would take to store it all.


Probably only one or two. I'd lean towards one, as well. I mean... there're 1TB hard drives out there, and google isn't caching downloadable files (99% of the time, at least; I found The Sims 2 in google's cache once. XD)
Graviteh

Level: 31

Posts: 209/500
EXP: 165989
For next: 19374

Since: 03-27-05
From: The Internet

Since last post: 42 days
Last activity: 1 day
Posted on 05-14-05 06:34 PM Link | Quote
Heh, The Sims 2? On Google? I wonder how much pirated software we could find on Google's cache.
HyperLamer
<||bass> and this was the soloution i thought of that was guarinteed to piss off the greatest amount of people

Sesshomaru
Tamaranian

Level: 118

Posts: 4476/8210
EXP: 18171887
For next: 211027

Since: 03-15-04
From: Canada, w00t!
LOL FAD

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 05-15-05 01:19 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Slay
Hmm, that doesn't seem like much. I bothered to do the caculation and it turns out to be 34865.2850001902587519026 bytes per second. The probability of a computer sustaining 35k per second is likely, but not for a full year. Most Windows and Mac-based computers shut down after a month or so of being left on. Add the stress of the constant download (it can't waver below 35k per second or it fails) and it does seem quite impossible with our current technology. Not to mention that it takes time to search for the new information, and with the current advent of bloggers, there's simply no way, the information is created too sporadically.

Well, two things:
1) It's an average. Some people might barely upload anything while others are putting up several gigs with their ridiculously fast connections.
2) It's not per user, it's total. Which does make it seem pretty damn small.
Mel
(USER WAS TOTALLY AWESOME FOR THIS POST)
Level: 47

Posts: 799/991
EXP: 762490
For next: 3713

Since: 03-15-04
From: secure tripcodes are for jerks

Since last post: 17 min.
Last activity: 16 min.
Posted on 05-15-05 02:05 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by windwaker
Originally posted by Gelion
I like how people hate Microsoft but they just lovvve Google. =D


Google rocks and M$ is lame half of the time. Hence why.

Do you have to access Google's "web archives" via this accelerator?


I find it intriguing about the double-standard people use. Just because Google happens to have a kick-ass marketing campaign and a well-funded PR department shouldn't mean that it isn't open to the same kind of scrutiny Microsoft is under.

I wish I remember what article that came from. Because it's a damn true quote.
Reid

Hardhat Beetle
Level 50 Bitches.
Level: 37

Posts: 466/558
EXP: 322182
For next: 16071

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 05-16-05 07:20 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Slay
Hmm, that doesn't seem like much. I bothered to do the caculation and it turns out to be 34865.2850001902587519026 bytes per second. The probability of a computer sustaining 35k per second is likely, but not for a full year. Most Windows and Mac-based computers shut down after a month or so of being left on. Add the stress of the constant download (it can't waver below 35k per second or it fails) and it does seem quite impossible with our current technology. Not to mention that it takes time to search for the new information, and with the current advent of bloggers, there's simply no way, the information is created too sporadically.



Very possible to download faster or slower than 35k at times. And if they go faster than 35k they can afford to have some downtime... but still trying something like that would be so...improbable. It could in theory be possible if you were on something like a t3 connection and you had billions upon billions of dollars. But all for the sake of helping people. Yeah that's not happening.
Pages: 1 2 3Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - General Chat - Google downloaded the internet. | |


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.020 seconds.